{"id":72364,"date":"2010-10-13T05:20:27","date_gmt":"2010-10-13T05:20:27","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2010\/10\/13\/la-dissolution-de-bho-a-lombre-involontaire-de-bill-clinton\/"},"modified":"2010-10-13T05:20:27","modified_gmt":"2010-10-13T05:20:27","slug":"la-dissolution-de-bho-a-lombre-involontaire-de-bill-clinton","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2010\/10\/13\/la-dissolution-de-bho-a-lombre-involontaire-de-bill-clinton\/","title":{"rendered":"La dissolution de BHO \u00e0 l&rsquo;ombre involontaire de Bill Clinton"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><h4>La dissolution de BHO \u00e0 l&rsquo;ombre involontaire de Bill Clinton<\/h4>\n<p>Ce reportage d&rsquo;un journaliste de <em>Huffington.Post<\/em>, Howard Fineman, suivant la campagne des \u00e9lections US du 2 novembre, nous para\u00eet r\u00e9v\u00e9lateur. Cela se passe dans le Kentucky et cela se passe chez les d\u00e9mocrates, compl\u00e8tement d\u00e9sorient\u00e9s et incertains. Un homme y fait l\u00e0-bas, au nom de ces m\u00eames d\u00e9mocrates, une campagne de soutien revigorante : Bill Clinton, en pleine forme. Pas un mot pour Barack Obama, pas une seule r\u00e9f\u00e9rence, ni chez Bill Clinton, ni chez les candidats d\u00e9mocrates qu&rsquo;il soutient. \u00ab<em>It was as though we suddenly had only two branches of government<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tCes observations de campagne (le <a href=\"http:\/\/www.huffingtonpost.com\/2010\/10\/12\/post_548_n_759798.html?view=print \" class=\"gen\">12 octobre 2010<\/a> sur <em>Huffington.Post<\/em>) t\u00e9moignent effectivement d&rsquo;une sorte de dissolution du pr\u00e9sident Obama, qui ne semble plus gu\u00e8re exister. Bill Clinton a pris sa place, non parce qu&rsquo;il a des ambitions sp\u00e9ciales mais simplement parce que la place est \u00e0 prendre aupr\u00e8s des \u00e9lecteurs d\u00e9mocrates. Plus qu&rsquo;un ph\u00e9nom\u00e8ne de personnes et un ph\u00e9nom\u00e8ne de politique \u00e9lectorale, il s&rsquo;agit du ph\u00e9nom\u00e8ne d&rsquo;une \u00e9poque o\u00f9 les dirigeants politiques en place semblent effectivement se dissoudre dans l&rsquo;impuissance de leur politique. Dans ce cas, le souriant et \u00e9nergique Bill appara\u00eet comme une sorte de  sage du bon vieux temps (\u00ab<em>the Sage from a Better Age<\/em>)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00ab<em>Like Voldemort&rsquo;s, Obama&rsquo;s is a name no one dares utter  and that includes Clinton speaking to Democrats.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>At a sunny, noontime rally on the campus of the University of Kentucky in Lexington yesterday, the former president made a stirring, well-argued case for Democratic Senate candidate Jack Conway and for Democrats generally  without once mentioning Obama and rarely mentioning the presidency. It was as though we suddenly had only two branches of government.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>To be fair, almost no one else at the one-hour rally mentioned the sitting president. And Kentucky is staunch Republican territory. We&rsquo;re farther ahead in the generic ballot here than ever, GOP Senator Mitch McConnell of Kentucky told me yesterday. President Obama was never popular here, even at his peak.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>Still, the eerie invisibility of the president is a telling commentary on the Democrats&rsquo; confused, divided and defensive predicament as they brace for the verdict of the voters on Election Day, Nov. 2. There was something odd  and, if you&rsquo;re a Democrat, depressing  about a former Democratic president avoiding any mention of his Democratic successor.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>Clinton sincerely wants to help out on the trail  and certainly wants to avoid the accusation that he didn&rsquo;t try to help. But his travels have turned into a personal victory lap that often makes him  not the candidate he&rsquo;s touting  the center of attention. That was true here in Kentucky. The rally&rsquo;s mechanics were mostly handled by the Secret Service; more to the point, the final (and therefore top-billed) speaker wasn&rsquo;t Conway. It was Clinton. The Conway people didn&rsquo;t mind. They were glad to have him.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>Rail-thin but not frail, wearing a tweedy professorial sports coat and his signature rueful, knowing smile, Clinton was treated with a respect bordering on awe. His familiar mane of white hair, thinning now, was translucent in the sun, giving him an almost otherworldly look: the Sage from a Better Age<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>\n<p class=\"signature\"><em>dedefensa.org<\/em><\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>La dissolution de BHO \u00e0 l&rsquo;ombre involontaire de Bill Clinton Ce reportage d&rsquo;un journaliste de Huffington.Post, Howard Fineman, suivant la campagne des \u00e9lections US du 2 novembre, nous para\u00eet r\u00e9v\u00e9lateur. Cela se passe dans le Kentucky et cela se passe chez les d\u00e9mocrates, compl\u00e8tement d\u00e9sorient\u00e9s et incertains. Un homme y fait l\u00e0-bas, au nom de&hellip;&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[14],"tags":[8002,6041,10162,934,2631,10119,10160,6109],"class_list":["post-72364","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-ouverture-libre","tag-bho","tag-bill","tag-campafgne","tag-clinton","tag-de","tag-dissolution","tag-kentucky","tag-mid-term"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/72364","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=72364"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/72364\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=72364"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=72364"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=72364"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}