drones<\/em>, d’h\u00e9licopt\u00e8res, incursion, assassinats, etc.) et demandent d’\u00e9ventuelles mesures de r\u00e9torsion. Borchgrave signale aussi la stature nationale du docteur A.Q. Khanh, sp\u00e9cialiste des questions nucl\u00e9aires et activiste anti-am\u00e9ricaniste notoire, jusqu’\u00e0 voir pour lui une place de direction dans un futur gouvernement.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n\tLe cas pakistanais devient donc bien embarrassant pour les USA. Il a \u00e9t\u00e9 sugg\u00e9r\u00e9 que certains milieux proches des services de renseignement US, m\u00e9content du gouvernement d\u00e9mocratiquement \u00e9lu, seraient tent\u00e9s par un retour \u00e0 une dictature militaire. Lorsqu’on entend les sentiments de la hi\u00e9rarchie militaire, on se demande si l’id\u00e9e est vraiment excellente. Borchgrave observe que le Pakistan n’est plus d\u00e9sormais un alli\u00e9 fiable des USA, et qu’il est m\u00eame, pour certains dirigeants US, le centre mondial de la Terreur. Nous observons que, au vu de son activit\u00e9 vis-\u00e0-vis du Pakistan et des in\u00e9vitables r\u00e9sultats obtenus, la politique \u00e9trang\u00e8re et de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 nationale des USA continue \u00e0 accumuler les preuves de son \u00e9tonnante incons\u00e9quence et de son aveuglement sans limite. Borchgrave conclut que l’\u00e9quipe proche d’Obama, contrairement aux vux de Pentagone et de Petraeus, pourrait finalement songer r\u00e9ellement<\/strong> \u00e0 commencer un retrait acc\u00e9l\u00e9r\u00e9 d’Afghanistan en juillet 2011. Nous concluons en leur souhaitant bonne chance.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00abPakistan’s most prominent and vocal retired chiefs of the army are demanding that the country’s air force be ordered to shoot down drones and helicopters and increasingly angry active duty officers are voicing their approval in off-the-record conversations with Pakistani journalists.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00bbThe country’s senior generals on active duty are being blasted as American stooges. Gen. Mirza Aslam Beg, the retired army chief who succeeded President Muhammad Zia ul-Haq, who died in a mysterious 1988 plane crash, told The Nation daily that U.S. military and CIA drones were increasing the tempo of their intrusions in Pakistani air space and that many Pakistani people had been killed. We have got the means to avert threats to our security, said Beg, and our air force must be ordered to take action against them.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00bbBeg conceded it was very painful for him to hear that U.S. war criminal (U.S. Special Envoy for Pakistan and Afghanistan) Richard Holbrooke said in a statement that U.S. drone attacks were being carried out with the consent of the Pakistan government and the army’s (general headquarters).<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00bbAnother notorious and influential former head of Pakistan’s Inter-Services-Intelligence agency, Gen. Hamid Gul, said the United States fears the return of the Supreme Court because it could rule the U.S. drone attacks are violations of the country’s sovereignty.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00bbIf that happens, the Pakistani parliament would have to act on the Supreme Court’s decision and reverse the policy. The United States is skeptical and suspicious that if the Supreme Court is given free rein again in Pakistan, it is likely to rule against their interests and agenda in Pakistan. In another broadside, Gul said the Pakistani government should stop NATO supplies permanently or face the reality the wrath of the people.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n\n
dedefensa.org<\/em><\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Les militaires pakistanais \u00e0 bout de patience ? Dans un article pour UPI (le 12 octobre 2010), Arnaud de Borchgrave rapporte des d\u00e9clarations publiques de deux anciens chefs militaires pakistanais, extr\u00eamement influents et qui passent pour exprimer publiquement ce que les chefs militaires pakistanais en activit\u00e9 ne peuvent dire eux-m\u00eames. Ces deux anciens g\u00e9n\u00e9raux, l’ancien… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[14],"tags":[3561,1257,7725,10169,3379,2883,2746],"class_list":["post-72366","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-ouverture-libre","tag-anti-americanisme","tag-borchgrave","tag-gul","tag-khanh","tag-pakistan","tag-riposte","tag-souverainete"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/72366","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=72366"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/72366\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=72366"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=72366"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=72366"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}