{"id":72398,"date":"2010-10-26T06:46:47","date_gmt":"2010-10-26T06:46:47","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2010\/10\/26\/ellsberg-au-cote-dassange\/"},"modified":"2010-10-26T06:46:47","modified_gmt":"2010-10-26T06:46:47","slug":"ellsberg-au-cote-dassange","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2010\/10\/26\/ellsberg-au-cote-dassange\/","title":{"rendered":"Ellsberg au c\u00f4t\u00e9 d&rsquo;Assange"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><h4>Ellsberg au c\u00f4t\u00e9 d&rsquo;Assange<\/h4>\n<p>Daniel Ellsberg, l&rsquo;ic\u00f4ne des d\u00e9nonciateurs des turpitudes du syst\u00e8me de l&rsquo;am\u00e9ricanisme avec la diffusion des <em>Pentagon Papers<\/em> en 1972, a affirm\u00e9 avec \u00e9clat son soutien \u00e0 Julian Assange, de <em>Wikileaks<\/em>. Sa pr\u00e9sence \u00e0 Londres, samedi soir, pour une conf\u00e9rence de presse commune, avec Assange, marque avec \u00e9clat cette prise de position. Il est certain que Ellsberg craint beaucoup pour la s\u00e9curit\u00e9 de Assange et il esp\u00e8re que son soutien, \u00e0 cause de sa notori\u00e9t\u00e9, contribuera \u00e0 sa protection dans une certaine mesure.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tLe New York <em>Times<\/em>, qui joue un r\u00f4le ambigu en diffusant les documents de <em>Wikileaks<\/em> tout en attaquant Assange,  ambigu\u00eft\u00e9 propre \u00e0 prot\u00e9ger sa r\u00e9putation de journal ind\u00e9pendant tout en suivant la ligne principale de soutien au syst\u00e8me de l&rsquo;am\u00e9ricanisme,  a \u00e9dit\u00e9 un texte sur cette conf\u00e9rence de presse le <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2010\/10\/24\/world\/24london.html?_r=1&#038;pagewanted=print\" class=\"gen\">24 octobre 2010<\/a>. (Il est manifeste que le NYT a le soutien du syst\u00e8me dans cette tactique ambigu\u00eb, la protection de ce qu&rsquo;il reste de sa r\u00e9putation d&rsquo;ind\u00e9pendance \u00e9tant n\u00e9cessaire pour lui conserver une cr\u00e9dibilit\u00e9 qui rend sa collaboration avec le syst\u00e8me plus efficace. Au reste, il n&rsquo;y aucun risque dans cette tactique puisque la diffusion des documents est mondialement assur\u00e9e par d&rsquo;autres m\u00e9dias, et que la participation du NYT n&rsquo;est ainsi en rien dommageable au syst\u00e8me.)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tVoici des extraits, centr\u00e9s sur l&rsquo;intervention de Ellsberg.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00ab<em>Mr. Ellsberg, who said he had flown overnight from California to attend, described Mr. Assange admiringly as the most dangerous man in the world for challenging governments, particularly the United States. He said the WikiLeaks founder had been pursued across three continents by Western intelligence services and compared the Obama administration&rsquo;s threat to prosecute Mr. Assange to his own treatment under President Richard M. Nixon.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>Both men hit out at what they described as the Obama administration&rsquo;s aggressive pursuit of whistle-blowers, which Mr. Ellsberg said put the United States on a path to the kind of repressive legal framework that Britain has under its broad Official Secrets Act. He said the criminal investigations under President Obama of three Americans accused of leaking government secrets represented a new low.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>The three men he was referring to were Pfc. Bradley Manning, a former military intelligence analyst suspectfgthed of providing the documents on Afghanistan and Iraq to WikiLeaks; Thomas Drake, an official with the National Security Agency who was indicted this year; and Shamai Kedem Leibowitz, an F.B.I. linguist who pleaded guilty to leaking five classified documents in late 2009.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>Mr. Ellsberg said the Pentagon&rsquo;s demand that Mr. Assange return any classified materials in his possession was carefully couched in language similar to that used in the aftermath of the Pentagon Papers release, when he was threatened with criminal prosecution for espionage. Secrecy, Mr. Ellsberg said, is essential to empire.<\/em> []<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>Mr. Ellsberg, who described Iraq as a hopeless, deadly, stalemated war, said many of the civilian deaths there could be counted as murder.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>\n<p class=\"signature\"><em>dedefensa.org<\/em><\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Ellsberg au c\u00f4t\u00e9 d&rsquo;Assange Daniel Ellsberg, l&rsquo;ic\u00f4ne des d\u00e9nonciateurs des turpitudes du syst\u00e8me de l&rsquo;am\u00e9ricanisme avec la diffusion des Pentagon Papers en 1972, a affirm\u00e9 avec \u00e9clat son soutien \u00e0 Julian Assange, de Wikileaks. Sa pr\u00e9sence \u00e0 Londres, samedi soir, pour une conf\u00e9rence de presse commune, avec Assange, marque avec \u00e9clat cette prise de position.&hellip;&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[14],"tags":[9886,2631,3147,4311,8118,3256,3014,2852,9887,3257],"class_list":["post-72398","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-ouverture-libre","tag-assange","tag-de","tag-ellsberg","tag-fuite","tag-lamericanisme","tag-new","tag-systeme","tag-times","tag-wikileaks","tag-york"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/72398","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=72398"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/72398\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=72398"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=72398"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=72398"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}