Sur Truthdig.com<\/em>, le 9 novembre 2010<\/a>, Richard Reeves fait un article o\u00f9 il restitue le climat des conversations et discussions de salon et de bistrot \u00e0 Washington, concernant Tea Party<\/em> et ses intentions r\u00e9volutionnaires Et qu’est-ce qu’il se dit ? Rien, puisque Washington se contente de se marrer (\u00ab Washington Laughs at Revolution’<\/em>\u00bb).<\/p>\n<\/p>\n \tEt Washington a bien des raisons de se marrer. On a d\u00e9j\u00e0 annonc\u00e9 des r\u00e9volutions, de nouveaux \u00e9lus (freshmen<\/em>) arrivant \u00e0 Washington d\u00e9cid\u00e9s \u00e0 tout changer. Cela s’est toujours termin\u00e9 de la m\u00eame fa\u00e7on : gloutonnement dig\u00e9r\u00e9s par le syst\u00e8me, ses trucs, ses compromissions, ses arrangements et sa corruption. Alors, pourquoi pas cette fois encore ? Raisonnement cynique imparable, dont les salons des grandes capitales occidentalistes-am\u00e9ricanistes, qui entretiennent toutes un parti des salonards, sont coutumiers. Les salons se foutent du degr\u00e9 et de la profondeur de la col\u00e8re, ils se foutent d’un ch\u00f4mage proche de celui de la Grande D\u00e9prtession et des millions de familles mises \u00e0 la rue par la crise du cr\u00e9dit immobilier, ils se foutent de la tiersmondisation de l’Am\u00e9rique, ils se foutent de la psychologie qui \u00e9volue et change les situations du monde, ils se foutent de la r\u00e9alit\u00e9 de la crise terminale et eschatologique du syst\u00e8me, ils se foutent du blocage g\u00e9n\u00e9ral de notre civilisation. Ils pr\u00e9f\u00e8rent, parce que c’est leur droit et parce que c’est moins fatigant et plus brillant, le cynisme, qui a rarement tort mais pas toujours raison, les petits fours, les bons mots et les ricanements complices Points de vue diff\u00e9rents, on attendra avec int\u00e9r\u00eat de voir lequel est le bon.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t(…Cela, en notant tout de m\u00eame pour la justesse du d\u00e9bat que, lorsqu’il s’agit de Tea Party<\/em>, tout le monde<\/a>, \u00e0 Washington justement, ne se marre pas<\/a> comme tout le monde a l’air de se marrer dans les salons. La chose est tout de m\u00eame in\u00e9dite.)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00abSaid Marc Fisher of the Post: The victors of 2012, by and large, ran against Washington. They pledged to take back the country, to boot out politicians who had become creatures of Washington. Now they get to live here.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00bbMy goodness! This hasn’t happened since the Republicans swept the 1994 midterms or perhaps when the Democrats roared into power just two years ago. What the Post did was check what happened to the 73 new Republican revolutionaries who followed Newt Gingrich into power back then. Fourteen of them, it seems, are still in Congress. And the rest? More than half reneged on their promises to serve only three terms in this den of iniquity. They and most of the others stayed in Congress or stayed in Washington as lobbyists, lawyers, consultants, journalists, strategists.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00bbThey run against Washington calling it a cesspool and discover that it’s really a hot tub, said Craig Shirley, who came to town as an aide to conservative icon Sen. Gordon Humphrey of New Hampshire, and stayed to form a public relations company. That’s the usual story.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00bbLinda Killian of the Woodrow Wilson Center, who wrote a book titled The Freshmen: What Happened to the Republican Revolution, put it this way: Most decided, It’s great here in Washington and I want to stay, so I’ll figure out a way.’ People want to take you to dinner all the time and everybody’s hanging on your every word. By and large they become indistinguishable from the people they replaced.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00bbBob Barr, a former congressman from Florida, member of that Republican class of rebels, added: As soon as you get here, you find that a lot of those guys who supported you because you were going to shrink the size of government are banging on your door demanding that you bring home the bacon … Cut everyone else’s pork, not ours.’<\/em> []<\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00bbSo in Washington, the more things change, the more they are the same. As far as the deficit is concerned, there are only three optionsand probably no chancesto reduce spending: cut Social Security and Medicare, cut military spending or raise taxes. Barring unforeseen crises, we will have noisy gridlock for two years, nothing will be done, nothing will happen.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n \n dedefensa.org<\/em><\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" La r\u00e9volution \u00e0 Washington ? Washington se marre Sur Truthdig.com, le 9 novembre 2010, Richard Reeves fait un article o\u00f9 il restitue le climat des conversations et discussions de salon et de bistrot \u00e0 Washington, concernant Tea Party et ses intentions r\u00e9volutionnaires Et qu’est-ce qu’il se dit ? Rien, puisque Washington se contente de se… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[14],"tags":[9053,2604,5623,7069,2879,8973,10285,8256,3248],"class_list":["post-72443","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-ouverture-libre","tag-cynisme","tag-des","tag-parti","tag-party","tag-revolution","tag-salonards","tag-salons","tag-tea","tag-washington"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/72443","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=72443"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/72443\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=72443"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=72443"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=72443"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}