13 novembre 2010<\/a>. Apr\u00e8s les r\u00e9f\u00e9rences aux embrassades multiples entre BHO et les Indiens, Kinzer signale que l’Inde a clairement signifi\u00e9 \u00e0 Washington son opposition \u00e0 la politique iranienne des USA.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n\tEn fait, les critiques, la position et l’action de l’Inde vis-\u00e0-vis de Washington sur cette question rejoignent \u00e0 peu pr\u00e8s celles de la Turquie Un argument de plus pour appr\u00e9cier les bruyantes exclamations de nos strat\u00e8ges et experts sur la folle politique d’isolement de la Turquie, par ses prises de position sur l’Iran. Vision tr\u00e8s occidentaliste et am\u00e9ricaniste de la notion d’isolement.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
\t\u00abThis week in New Delhi, President Obama went further than any of his predecessors toward embracing India as an ally, and most Indians are thrilled by this warm treatment. This does not mean, however, that the two countries will align all of their foreign policies. In some areas, India would like the United States to change its approach.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00bbOne key difference is over Iran. India has the wiser policy, and Obama should consider emulating it.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00bbDespite some changes in atmospherics, Obama’s approach to Iran has been remarkably similar to the one President George W. Bush took in his second term: don’t bomb Iran, but continue to threaten that all options are on the table\u00a0\u00bb; steadily intensify economic sanctions, despite ample evidence that they weaken civil society and lavishly enrich the repressive Revolutionary Guard; insist on negotiations on the nuclear issue, but refuse to broaden the agenda to include issues that concern Iran.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00bbIndia, like many other regional powers, takes the Iranian threat far less seriously than the United States does. It does not see Iran as an existential threat to anyone, but rather as just another thuggish country with resources, and wants to see it enticed back into the world’s mainstream. India would like the United States to adopt a more accommodating policy toward Iran and could even serve as the bridge that makes it possible.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00bbOne of Iran’s other neighbors, Turkey, has already tried this approach. Turkish leaders have urged the United States to ratchet down its anti-Iran rhetoric, seek compromise instead of confrontation, and work to address Iran’s concerns in an effort to draw it out of its isolation. The Obama administration has rejected this advice. Now it’s India’s turn to try.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n\n
dedefensa.org<\/em><\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"L’Inde contre la politique iranienne de Washington : comme la Turquie Une retomb\u00e9e int\u00e9ressante du voyage de Barack Obama en Inde, du moins dans le commentaire de Stephen Kinzer, du Boston Globe, le 13 novembre 2010. Apr\u00e8s les r\u00e9f\u00e9rences aux embrassades multiples entre BHO et les Indiens, Kinzer signale que l’Inde a clairement signifi\u00e9 \u00e0… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[14],"tags":[3066,3378,2773,6555,4607,2613],"class_list":["post-72466","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-ouverture-libre","tag-americaniste","tag-inde","tag-iran","tag-isolement","tag-politique","tag-turquie"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/72466","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=72466"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/72466\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=72466"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=72466"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=72466"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}