{"id":72534,"date":"2010-12-04T12:48:33","date_gmt":"2010-12-04T12:48:33","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2010\/12\/04\/assange-pas-assez-preserve-ou-le-fou-rire-of-the-world\/"},"modified":"2010-12-04T12:48:33","modified_gmt":"2010-12-04T12:48:33","slug":"assange-pas-assez-preserve-ou-le-fou-rire-of-the-world","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2010\/12\/04\/assange-pas-assez-preserve-ou-le-fou-rire-of-the-world\/","title":{"rendered":"Assange pas assez pr\u00e9serv\u00e9, ou le fou-rire of the world<\/em>"},"content":{"rendered":"

Assange pas assez pr\u00e9serv\u00e9, ou le fou-rire of the world<\/em><\/h4>\n

C’est au choix : ou bien notre monde, sous la direction \u00e9clair\u00e9e de Notre-Syst\u00e8me, s’\u00e9croule dans la trag\u00e9die apocalyptique, ou bien il s’\u00e9croule dans un fou-rire inextinguible. Pour le cas mentionn\u00e9 ici, c’est la deuxi\u00e8me option.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tIl s’agit du sort de Julian Assange, fondateur de Wikileaks<\/em>, dont on devrait savoir rapidement s’il est candidat pour le Prix Nobel du ben Laden<\/a> de la deuxi\u00e8me d\u00e9cennie du XXI\u00e8me si\u00e8cle, disons, s’il \u00e9chappe aux foudres surprenantes de la justice su\u00e9doise. Le sort actuel de Julian Assange, en effet, est particuli\u00e8rement n\u00e9buleux, et les nouvelles donn\u00e9es par un avocat australien qui travailla temporairement pour lui ne font rien pour les dissiper.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tSelon James D. Catlin, avocat \u00e0 Melbourne, \u00e9crivant dans The Australian<\/em>, l’accusation de viol contre Assange relanc\u00e9e par la justice su\u00e9doise apr\u00e8s un abandon initial et impliquant une \u00e9ventuelle demande d’extradition (sans doute d’Angleterre o\u00f9 il se trouverait, qui sait…) tiendrait au fait qu’Assange aurait eu des relations sexuelles consentantes, mais qu’il ne portait pas de pr\u00e9servatif durant la, ou les chose(s). En Su\u00e8de, il semble qu’une femme ayant eu des relations sexuelles consenties avec un homme, puis s’apercevant que le dit bonhomme n’\u00e9tait pas \u00e9quip\u00e9 en cons\u00e9quence, peut porter plainte pour viol, et que sa plainte est d\u00fbment consid\u00e9r\u00e9e. James D. Catlin qualifie cette accusation contre Assange, dans les circonstances pr\u00e9sentes, de the laughingstock of the world<\/em>, disons, le Prix Nobel du fou-rire<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tVoyons cela dans RAW Story<\/em> du 2 d\u00e9cembre 2010<\/a><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00abA lawyer who recently represented Julian Assange says the Swedish sex assault investigation into the WikiLeaks founder is based on claims he didn’t use condoms during sex with two Swedish women.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbJames D. Catlin, a lawyer in Melbourne, Australia, says in an article published Thursday that Sweden’s justice system is destined to become the laughingstock of the world for investigating rape charges in two cases where women complained that Assange had had sex with them without using a condom.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbCatlin, who confirmed to Raw Story that Assange retained his services for a limited duration in October but did not provide details, also said both of the accusers \u00ab\u00a0boast[ed] of their respective conquests\u00a0\u00bb after the alleged crimes had been committed. The Swedes are making it up as they go along, he wrote.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbCatlin’s claims are likely to add fuel to speculation that Sweden’s investigation of Assange is politically motivated.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbHe writes:<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbApparently having consensual sex in Sweden without a condom is punishable by a term of imprisonment of a minimum of two years for rape. That is the basis for a reinstitution of rape charges against WikiLeaks figurehead Julian Assange that is destined to make Sweden and its justice system the laughing stock of the world and dramatically damage its reputation as a model of modernity.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbSweden’s Public Prosecutor’s Office was embarrassed in August this year when it leaked to the media that it was seeking to arrest Assange for rape, then on the same day withdrew the arrest warrant because in its own words there was no evidence. The damage to Assange’s reputation is incalculable. More than three quarters of internet references to his name refer to rape. Now, three months on and three prosecutors later, the Swedes seem to be clear on their basis to proceed. Consensual sex that started out with a condom ended up without one, ergo, the sex was not consensual.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\n

dedefensa.org<\/em><\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Assange pas assez pr\u00e9serv\u00e9, ou le fou-rire of the world C’est au choix : ou bien notre monde, sous la direction \u00e9clair\u00e9e de Notre-Syst\u00e8me, s’\u00e9croule dans la trag\u00e9die apocalyptique, ou bien il s’\u00e9croule dans un fou-rire inextinguible. Pour le cas mentionn\u00e9 ici, c’est la deuxi\u00e8me option. Il s’agit du sort de Julian Assange, fondateur de… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[14],"tags":[9886,4787,10454,10453,10451,10450,9953],"class_list":["post-72534","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-ouverture-libre","tag-assange","tag-australie","tag-avocat","tag-catlin","tag-consentant","tag-preservatif","tag-viol"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/72534","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=72534"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/72534\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=72534"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=72534"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=72534"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}