{"id":72540,"date":"2010-12-06T10:00:24","date_gmt":"2010-12-06T10:00:24","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2010\/12\/06\/au-fait-larabie-est-elle-daccord-pour-quon-attaque-larabie\/"},"modified":"2010-12-06T10:00:24","modified_gmt":"2010-12-06T10:00:24","slug":"au-fait-larabie-est-elle-daccord-pour-quon-attaque-larabie","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2010\/12\/06\/au-fait-larabie-est-elle-daccord-pour-quon-attaque-larabie\/","title":{"rendered":"Au fait, l&rsquo;Arabie est-elle d&rsquo;accord pour qu&rsquo;on attaque l&rsquo;Arabie ?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><h4>Au fait, l&rsquo;Arabie est-elle d&rsquo;accord pour qu&rsquo;on attaque l&rsquo;Arabie ?<\/h4>\n<p>Il y a une semaine, dans les premiers embruns du <em>tsunami<\/em> de l&rsquo;excellent monsieur Assange, de <em>Wikileaks<\/em>, un certain esprit belliciste, interventionniste, am\u00e9ricaniste-occidentaliste triomphait \u00e0 la lecture du c\u00e2ble secret o\u00f9 l&rsquo;on lisait que le roi d&rsquo;Arabie Saoudite pressait les USA d&rsquo;attaquer l&rsquo;Iran. Aujourd&rsquo;hui, nous sommes plac\u00e9s devant une d\u00e9ferlante de c\u00e2bles nous informant que l&rsquo;Arabie Saoudite est le premier financier du terrorisme islamique au monde. Comme on dit et comme nul n&rsquo;en ignore par le fait, tout le monde le savait ; mais lorsque c&rsquo;est la secr\u00e9taire d&rsquo;Etat Clinton qui l&rsquo;\u00e9crit \u00e0 ses diplomates, en leur demandant de faire pression sur les cheikhs pour qu&rsquo;ils en fassent un peu moins pour les terroristes d&rsquo;al Qa\u00efda, des talibans et compagnie,  eh bien, on le sait encore mieux et cela commence \u00e0 devenir g\u00eanant.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tAlors, que fait-on ? On demande \u00e0 l&rsquo;Arabie si elle est d&rsquo;accord pour qu&rsquo;on attaque l&rsquo;Arabie ? Ou bien, en parler \u00e0 l&rsquo;Iran, non ? <\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tDans sa synth\u00e8se pour <em>Antiwar.com<\/em>, du <a href=\"http:\/\/news.antiwar.com\/2010\/12\/05\/wikileaks-cables-bring-renewed-attention-to-saudi-terror-funding\/\" class=\"gen\">6 d\u00e9cembre 2010<\/a>, Jason Ditz nous donne les principaux liens sur le sujet. Il observe \u00e9galement que ces derni\u00e8res livraisons de <em>Wikileaks<\/em> vont \u00eatre embarrassantes pour l&rsquo;Arabie Peut-\u00eatre, mais pour Washington, pour Hillary et pour BHO, \u00e0 notre avis, s\u00fbrement.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00ab<em>A new flurry of WikiLeaks cables may prove embarrassing to Saudi Arabia, as the documents show US allegations that the nation is the world&rsquo;s largest source for funding to al-Qaeda, the Taliban, and other Sunni terror groups.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>The new documents include a December 2009 memo signed by Secretary of State Hillary Clinton urging diplomats to press Saudi Arabia on the funding efforts, despite other documents praising the Saudi government as a key partner is stopping such funding.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>US officials have expressed concerns about Saudi funding for terror in the past, but the cables provide a more frank assessment of what the US sees as the major problems, primarily the Saudi government&rsquo;s reluctance to crack down on religious charities.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>\n<p class=\"signature\"><em>dedefensa.org<\/em><\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Au fait, l&rsquo;Arabie est-elle d&rsquo;accord pour qu&rsquo;on attaque l&rsquo;Arabie ? Il y a une semaine, dans les premiers embruns du tsunami de l&rsquo;excellent monsieur Assange, de Wikileaks, un certain esprit belliciste, interventionniste, am\u00e9ricaniste-occidentaliste triomphait \u00e0 la lecture du c\u00e2ble secret o\u00f9 l&rsquo;on lisait que le roi d&rsquo;Arabie Saoudite pressait les USA d&rsquo;attaquer l&rsquo;Iran. Aujourd&rsquo;hui, nous&hellip;&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[14],"tags":[3259,934,7709,3278,3558,1267,9887],"class_list":["post-72540","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-ouverture-libre","tag-arabie","tag-clinton","tag-financier","tag-hillary","tag-saoudite","tag-terrorisme","tag-wikileaks"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/72540","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=72540"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/72540\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=72540"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=72540"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=72540"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}