{"id":72549,"date":"2010-12-08T12:41:23","date_gmt":"2010-12-08T12:41:23","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2010\/12\/08\/desaccord-pentagone-departement-detat-sur-les-consequences-de-cablegate\/"},"modified":"2010-12-08T12:41:23","modified_gmt":"2010-12-08T12:41:23","slug":"desaccord-pentagone-departement-detat-sur-les-consequences-de-cablegate","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2010\/12\/08\/desaccord-pentagone-departement-detat-sur-les-consequences-de-cablegate\/","title":{"rendered":"D\u00e9saccord Pentagone-d\u00e9partement d’Etat sur les cons\u00e9quences de Cablegate<\/em>"},"content":{"rendered":"

D\u00e9saccord Pentagone-d\u00e9partement d’Etat sur les cons\u00e9quences de Cablegate<\/em><\/h4>\n

Une nouvelle post\u00e9e \u00e0 la date du 9 d\u00e9cembre 2010<\/a> par le site GovernmentExecutive.com<\/em> et pr\u00e9sent\u00e9e dans le num\u00e9ro du 2 d\u00e9cembre 2010 de National Journal<\/em> indique un d\u00e9saccord s\u00e9rieux entre le d\u00e9partement d’Etat et le Pentagone sur les cons\u00e9quences de Cablegate<\/em> pour la diplomatie US.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tAussit\u00f4t apr\u00e8s les premi\u00e8res fuites de Cablegate<\/em>, le secr\u00e9taire \u00e0 la d\u00e9fense Gates avait minimis\u00e9 les cons\u00e9quences de ces fuites. (Voir F&C<\/em> du 6 d\u00e9cembre 2010<\/a>, cette d\u00e9claration de Gates : \u00abThe fact is, governments deal with the United States because it’s in their interest, not because they like us, not because they trust us, and not because they believe we can keep secrets [S]ome governments deal with us because they fear us, some because they respect us, most because they need us. We are still essentially, as has been said before, the indispensable nation.<\/em>\u00bb)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tLa nouvelle donne une version compl\u00e8tement diff\u00e9rente de l’\u00e9valuation faite par le d\u00e9partement d’Etat. Sans doute faut-il voir dans cette diff\u00e9rence la vision du Pentagone qui, d’une part, con\u00e7oit la diplomatie comme une d\u00e9monstration de force et reste confiant dans sa propre force (domaine de l’illusion de l’hubris<\/em> am\u00e9ricaniste), et qui, d’autre part, minimise ainsi le r\u00f4le qu’il accorde au d\u00e9partement d’Etat \u00e0 son propre avantage.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00abTaking issue with the appraisal made by Defense Secretary Robert Gates, a top State Department official said on Wednesday the WikiLeaks disclosure of thousands of classified cables have done substantial damage to U.S. diplomatic efforts. It’s going to complicate U.S. diplomacy and international cooperation for a long time after the headlines stop, said the official, who was authorized to speak to reporters on condition of anonymity.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbThe senior State official’s assessment differed starkly from that offered by Gates, who called the disclosures embarrassing and awkward, but with only a fairly modest effect on diplomacy. Gates was asked whether he had made contact with foreign counterparts about the leaks. He said he had not.<\/em> <\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbThe senior official said that Secretary of State Hillary Clinton has already acted to try to mitigate the effects of the release of thousands of private conversations, leader assessments, and internal instructions. According to the official, 186 countries have been contacted by the U.S. virtually everyone who will take our calls.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbThe official said the State Department expects countries to be more reticent in scheduling meetings with high-level officials in the future, and worries that the U.S. inability to secure diplomatic communications will make it more difficult to work together on issues of transnational significance. We have a lot of work to do to rebuild people’s trust, the official said.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\n

dedefensa.org<\/em><\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

D\u00e9saccord Pentagone-d\u00e9partement d’Etat sur les cons\u00e9quences de Cablegate Une nouvelle post\u00e9e \u00e0 la date du 9 d\u00e9cembre 2010 par le site GovernmentExecutive.com et pr\u00e9sent\u00e9e dans le num\u00e9ro du 2 d\u00e9cembre 2010 de National Journal indique un d\u00e9saccord s\u00e9rieux entre le d\u00e9partement d’Etat et le Pentagone sur les cons\u00e9quences de Cablegate pour la diplomatie US. Aussit\u00f4t… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[14],"tags":[10462,10485,3889,3888,5750,2628,3984,3194,2671],"class_list":["post-72549","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-ouverture-libre","tag-cablegate","tag-consequences","tag-detat","tag-departement","tag-desaccord","tag-diplomatie","tag-gates","tag-pentagone","tag-us"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/72549","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=72549"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/72549\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=72549"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=72549"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=72549"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}