{"id":72553,"date":"2010-12-08T18:42:19","date_gmt":"2010-12-08T18:42:19","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2010\/12\/08\/anonymous-attaque-mastercard-pour-soutenir-wikileaks\/"},"modified":"2010-12-08T18:42:19","modified_gmt":"2010-12-08T18:42:19","slug":"anonymous-attaque-mastercard-pour-soutenir-wikileaks","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2010\/12\/08\/anonymous-attaque-mastercard-pour-soutenir-wikileaks\/","title":{"rendered":"<em>Anonymous<\/em> attaque <em>MasterCard<\/em> pour soutenir <em>Wikileaks<\/em>"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><h4><em>Anonymous<\/em> attaque <em>MasterCard<\/em> pour soutenir <em>Wikileaks<\/em> <\/h4>\n<p>Les attaques contre les grands groupes qui prennent des mesures contre <em>Wikileaks<\/em> se poursuivent. Derni\u00e8re victime en date : <em>MasterCard<\/em>, qui a pris des mesures contre <em>Wikileaks<\/em> et a aussit\u00f4t \u00e9t\u00e9 l&rsquo;objet d&rsquo;une attaque.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tLe <em>Guardian<\/em> de ce <a href=\"http:\/\/www.guardian.co.uk\/media\/2010\/dec\/08\/mastercard-hackers-wikileaks-revenge\" class=\"gen\">8 d\u00e9cembre 2010<\/a>, donne quelques pr\u00e9cisions sur cette attaque<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00ab <em>The website of MasterCard has been hacked and partially paralysed in apparent revenge for the international credit card&rsquo;s decision to cease taking donations to WikiLeaks. A group of online activists calling themselves Anonymous appear to have orchestrated a DDOS (distributed denial of service) attack on the site, bringing its service at www.mastercard.com to a halt for many users.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em> Operation: Payback is the latest salvo in the increasingly febrile technological war over WikiLeaks. MasterCard announced on Monday that it would no longer process donations to the whistleblowing site, claiming it was engaged in illegal activity.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em> The group, which has been linked to the influential internet messageboard 4Chan, has been targeting commercial sites which have cut their ties with WikiLeaks. The Swiss bank PostFinance has already been targeted by Anonymous after it froze payments to WikiLeaks, and the group has vowed to target Paypal, which has also ceased processing payments to the site. Other possible targets are EveryDNS.net, which suspended dealings on 3 December, Amazon, which removed WikiLeaks content from its EC2 cloud on 1 December, and Visa, which suspended its own dealings yesterday.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em> The action was confirmed on Twitter at 9.39am by user @Anon_Operation, who later tweeted: \u00ab WE ARE GLAD TO TELL YOU THAT http:\/\/www.mastercard.com\/ is DOWN AND IT&rsquo;S CONFIRMED! #ddos #wikileaks Operation:Payback(is a bitch!) #PAYBACK&#8221;<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tDans un autre texte de ce m\u00eame <a href=\"http:\/\/www.guardian.co.uk\/media\/2010\/dec\/08\/anonymous-4chan-wikileaks-mastercard-paypal?intcmp=239\" class=\"gen\">8 d\u00e9cembre 2010<\/a>, le m\u00eame <em>Guardian<\/em>, qui a pris contact avec le groupe <em>The Anonymous<\/em>, donne quelques pr\u00e9cisions int\u00e9ressantes sur cette premi\u00e8re unit\u00e9 identifi\u00e9e de la cyber-insurrection. L&rsquo;int\u00e9r\u00eat des diverses pr\u00e9cisions donn\u00e9es est qu&rsquo;il s&rsquo;agit de groupes qui n&rsquo;ont pas n\u00e9cessairement les m\u00eames buts, les m\u00eames conceptions, mais qui, de plus en plus, se battent pour des principes dont le sens g\u00e9n\u00e9ral est antisyst\u00e8me.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00ab <em>A 22-year-old spokesman, who wished to be known only as Coldblood, told the Guardian that the group  which is about a thousand strong  is quite a loose band of people who share the same kind of id\u00e9als and wish to be a force for chaotic good.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>There is no real command structure in the group, the London-based spokesman said, while most of its members are teenagers who are trying to make an impact on what happens with the limited knowledge they have. But others are parents, IT professionals and people who happen to have time  and resources  on their hands.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>The group has gained notoriety for its attacks on copyright-enforcement agencies and organisations such as the Church of Scientology.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>Anonymous was born out of the influential internet messageboard 4chan, a forum popular with hackers and gamers, in 2003. The group&rsquo;s name is a tribute to 4chan&rsquo;s early days, when any posting to its forums where no name was given was ascribed to Anonymous. But the ephemeral group, which picks up causes whenever it feels like it, has now gone beyond 4Chan into something biger, its spokesman said.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>The membership of Anonymous is impossible to pin down; it has been described as being like a flock of birds  the only way you can identify members is by what they&rsquo;re doing together. Essentially, once enough people on the 4chan message boards decide that an issue is worth pursuing in large enough numbers, it becomes an \u00ab\u00a0Anonymous\u00a0\u00bb cause.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>The group counts the current campaign in support of WikiLeaks as probably one of<\/em> [its] <em>most high profile yet. The group gained notoriety more recently for a number of sustained assaults against the sites of US music industry body RIAA, Kiss musician Gene Simmons, and solicitors&rsquo; firms involved in lawsuits against people suspected of illegal filesharing. In early 2008, Anonymous launched a campaign against the Church of Scientology, bringing down related websites and and promising to expel the religion from the internet.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>We&rsquo;re against corporations and government interfering on the internet,\u00a0\u00bb Coldblood added. \u00ab\u00a0We believe it should be open and free for everyone. Governments shouldn&rsquo;t try to censor because they don&rsquo;t agree with it. Anonymous is supporting WikiLeaks not because we agree or disagree with the data that is being sent out, but we disagree with any from of censorship on the internet. If we let WikiLeaks fall without a fight then governments will think they can just take down any sites they wish or disagree with.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>The spokesman said Anonymous plans to move away from DDoS attacks and instead focus on methods to support WikiLeaks, such as mirroring the site. There&rsquo;s no doubt in<\/em> [Anonymous members&rsquo;] <em>mind that they are breaking<\/em> [the] <em>law, he said of the latest attacks. But they feel that there&rsquo;s safety in numbers.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>\n<p class=\"signature\"><em>dedefensa.org<\/em><\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Anonymous attaque MasterCard pour soutenir Wikileaks Les attaques contre les grands groupes qui prennent des mesures contre Wikileaks se poursuivent. Derni\u00e8re victime en date : MasterCard, qui a pris des mesures contre Wikileaks et a aussit\u00f4t \u00e9t\u00e9 l&rsquo;objet d&rsquo;une attaque. Le Guardian de ce 8 d\u00e9cembre 2010, donne quelques pr\u00e9cisions sur cette attaque \u00ab The&hellip;&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[14],"tags":[10494,2870,10497,10499,10500,10495,9887],"class_list":["post-72553","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-ouverture-libre","tag-anonymous","tag-attaque","tag-card","tag-chaotic","tag-good","tag-master","tag-wikileaks"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/72553","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=72553"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/72553\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=72553"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=72553"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=72553"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}