{"id":72587,"date":"2010-12-17T07:07:45","date_gmt":"2010-12-17T07:07:45","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2010\/12\/17\/et-voici-openleaks\/"},"modified":"2010-12-17T07:07:45","modified_gmt":"2010-12-17T07:07:45","slug":"et-voici-openleaks","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2010\/12\/17\/et-voici-openleaks\/","title":{"rendered":"Et voici OpenLeaks<\/em>\u2026"},"content":{"rendered":"

Et voici OpenLeaks<\/em><\/h4>\n

Un nouveau site consacr\u00e9 \u00e0 la publicit\u00e9 de documents secrets est sur le point d’\u00eatre lanc\u00e9, par un groupe d’anciens de WikiLeaks<\/em> (dont l’ancien porte-parole de WikiLeaks<\/em>, Daniel Domscheit-Berg ) qui ont rompu avec Assange pour des raisons de m\u00e9sententes personnelles et m\u00e9thodologiques. Le nouveau site (http:\/\/www.openleaks.org\/<\/a>) est pr\u00e9sent\u00e9 sur le site Threat Level<\/em>, le 15 d\u00e9cembre 2010<\/a>.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tLa pr\u00e9sentation se fait sous un jour tr\u00e8s favorable, implicitement critique des m\u00e9thodes d’Assange et d’Assange lui-m\u00eame, avec son pr\u00e9tendu culte de la personnalit\u00e9.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tOpenLeaks<\/em> \u00abaims to avoid the cult of personality that has arisen around WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange, and the controversies and legal pressures his leadership has attracted. It will place editorial control of leaks in the hands of established journalists, rather than acting as a publisher itself.<\/em> []<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbUnlike WikiLeaks, OpenLeaks will not publish documents. Instead, it will operate as an online dropbox, creating an infrastructure to deliver documents securely and anonymously directly to journalists and other outlets such as human rights organizations, labor unions, non-governmental oversight groups that choose to participate.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbSources will not be able to submit documents directly through the OpenLeaks website. Instead, participating media outlets and others will be able to include links on their websites for submissions that will be delivered through the OpenLeaks-designed architecture.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbThe plan is similar to a failed proposal that WikiLeaks had submitted to the Knight Foundation News Challenge grant in 2009. WikiLeaks had sought $530,000 from the foundation to build an anonymous submission system that would be linked through local newspaper websites, allowing sources to submit documents related to local issues. The receiving newspaper would have exclusive access to the documents for a period of time before WikiLeaks published the documents on its own website. The Knight Foundation rejected the application.<\/em> []<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbThe organization’s structure means it will be a more silent partner in the distribution of leaks, not using the leaks to further personal political agendas, which Assange has been accused of doing with his organization.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bb To me the key element is that it introduces an accountable editorial ingredient into the publication process and that’s promising, says Steve Aftergood, director of the Project on Government Secrecy for the Federation of American Scientists, which also publishes leaked government documents.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbAftergood has been critical of WikiLeaks for what he calls information vandalism that is, publishing documents in violation of copyright law and publishing information that has seemingly little or no news value just because it can.<\/em> [] The OpenLeaks approach would presumably only lead to the publication of newsworthy material, Aftergood says. It would also exclude violations of personal privacy, libelous material, infringements on intellectual property and so forth, because the news organizations publishing the material would be in a position to exercise editorial control. As a result, it may prove to be both more politically palatable and more resistant to external controversy, says Aftergood.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tUne voix discordante est cit\u00e9e dans ce commentaire \u00e9logieux consacr\u00e9 \u00e0 OpenLeaks<\/em>. Elle concerne notamment l’argument selon lequel le culte de la personnalit\u00e9 est combattu, cela comme critique indirect d’Assange mais aussi comme argument contre l’efficacit\u00e9 de WikiLeaks<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00abNew York University journalism professor Jay Rosen says the latter may not be a good thing because Assange’s personality may be part of what draws sources to release documents to WikiLeaks. He says WikiLeaks’ success is based on an implied contract it has with sources that it will provide them with a secure, anonymous channel for submitting documents, and will then make sure their submissions are published and seen.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbWe don’t know how much of the power in that promise is in fact a result of Assange and his public advocacy and the very strong stands that he sometimes takes, Rosen told Threat Level. It’s possible that OpenLeaks won’t be as attractive to sources. On the other hand, it might be more so. The sources will decide what method is more effective.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\n

dedefensa.org<\/em><\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Et voici OpenLeaks Un nouveau site consacr\u00e9 \u00e0 la publicit\u00e9 de documents secrets est sur le point d’\u00eatre lanc\u00e9, par un groupe d’anciens de WikiLeaks (dont l’ancien porte-parole de WikiLeaks, Daniel Domscheit-Berg ) qui ont rompu avec Assange pour des raisons de m\u00e9sententes personnelles et m\u00e9thodologiques. Le nouveau site (http:\/\/www.openleaks.org\/) est pr\u00e9sent\u00e9 sur le site… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[14],"tags":[10444,9886,10553,9887],"class_list":["post-72587","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-ouverture-libre","tag-aftergood","tag-assange","tag-openleaks","tag-wikileaks"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/72587","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=72587"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/72587\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=72587"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=72587"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=72587"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}