{"id":72595,"date":"2010-12-18T12:27:05","date_gmt":"2010-12-18T12:27:05","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2010\/12\/18\/le-systeme-contre-assange-une-vindicte-staliniennne\/"},"modified":"2010-12-18T12:27:05","modified_gmt":"2010-12-18T12:27:05","slug":"le-systeme-contre-assange-une-vindicte-staliniennne","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2010\/12\/18\/le-systeme-contre-assange-une-vindicte-staliniennne\/","title":{"rendered":"Le syst\u00e8me contre Assange : une vindicte staliniennne"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>D&rsquo;une fa\u00e7on g\u00e9n\u00e9rale, on pourrait observer que le Syst\u00e8me, vis-\u00e0-vis des divers acteurs dans l&rsquo;affaire <em>Cablegate<\/em>, se conduit \u00e0 peu pr\u00e8s comme le r\u00e9gime stalinien. Pas de surprise \u00e0 avoir, la parent\u00e9 entre les bureaucraties (la stalinienne et l&rsquo;am\u00e9ricaniste) \u00e9tant patente. On dira simplement que la m\u00e9thode stalinienne \u00e9tait plus rude et moins sophistiqu\u00e9e, et prenait moins de ces gants blancs m\u00e9dicaux en caoutchouc dont ne manquent pas, conform\u00e9ment au r\u00e8glement, de se parer les interrogateurs du syst\u00e8me de l&rsquo;am\u00e9ricanisme. Par contre, la version am\u00e9ricaniste p\u00e8che par son incroyable vanit\u00e9 camoufl\u00e9e sous le nom un peu plus chic d&rsquo;<em>hubris<\/em>. A part cela, on est en famille.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tNotamment, on sent dans le Syst\u00e8me US la m\u00eame volont\u00e9 d&rsquo;acharnement contre Assange qu&rsquo;on sentait, par exemple, chez Staline contre Trotsky (assassin\u00e9 par le NKVD aux Mexique en 1940). Il y avait chez Staline une vindicte personnelle, mais aussi la crainte fond\u00e9e, d&rsquo;ailleurs depuis le d\u00e9part de Trotsky d&rsquo;URSS en 1929, que Trotsky r\u00e9alise effectivement un rassemblement anti-stalinien qui aurait pu contrecarrer les projets dudit Staline. Il n&rsquo;y a rien de semblable dans la vindicte contre Assange d\u00e9ploy\u00e9 par le Syst\u00e8me, lequel Syst\u00e8me s&rsquo;est montr\u00e9 totalement inefficace et incomp\u00e9tent, face aux diverses op\u00e9rations de <em>WikiLeaks<\/em>. Il y a d&rsquo;abord l&rsquo;ivresse de la puissance du Syst\u00e8me, laquelle explique cette inertie face \u00e0 <em>WikiLeaks<\/em>, suivie de cette fureur de la vanit\u00e9 bless\u00e9e devant l&rsquo;effet mondial produit par <em>Cablegate<\/em>. Le Syst\u00e8me n&rsquo;a ni la rouerie impitoyable, ni l&rsquo;habilet\u00e9 cynique du r\u00e9gime stalinien. Il est impitoyable et cynique sans \u00e9tat d&rsquo;\u00e2me, mais il est aussi d&rsquo;une incomp\u00e9tence remarquable.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tActuellement, les pressions sont tr\u00e8s fortes aux USA pour tenter de mettre sur pied un cas qui pourrait justifier la demande d&rsquo;extradition d&rsquo;Assange. C&rsquo;est Assange lui-m\u00eame qui en a inform\u00e9 la presse, comme le <em>Guardian<\/em> le rapporte ce <a href=\"http:\/\/www.guardian.co.uk\/media\/2010\/dec\/17\/julian-assange-wikileaks-us-investigation\" class=\"gen\">17 d\u00e9cembre 2010<\/a>.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00ab<em>WikiLeaks faces a very agressive and secretive investigation by US authorities stung by a perceived loss of face following the release of thousands of secret American diplomatic cables, the organisation&rsquo;s founder, Julian Assange, said today. Speaking to reporters outside Ellingham Hall, the Norfolk house at which he is staying on bail following his release from prison, Assange said WikiLeaks faced what appears to be an illegal investigation &#8230; certain people who are alleged to be affiliated to us have been detained, followed around, had their computers seized and so on.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>He said he believed it was 80% likely that the US authorities were seeking to prepare an attempt to have him extradited there to face charges of espionage. He added that he was reliant on public opinion to rein in a superpower that does not appear to be following the rule of law.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>I would say that there is a very aggressive investigation, that a lot of face has been lost by some people, and some people have careers to make by pursuing famous cases, but that is actually something that needs monitoring, he said.<\/em> [] [I]<em>n the United States, what appears to be a secret grand jury investigation against me, or our organisation  not a single comment about what is actually going on.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tUn autre point d&rsquo;attention pour mesurer la vindicte du Syst\u00e8me, c&rsquo;est le sort du soldat Manning, d\u00e9tenu depuis 200 jours dans un isolement complet \u00e0 la base des Marines de Quantico, dans des conditions qui s&rsquo;apparentent \u00e0 un traitement de torture psychologique. (Le site <em>Daily Beast<\/em> donne, le <a href=\"http:\/\/www.thedailybeast.com\/blogs-and-stories\/2010-12-17\/bradley-manning-wikileaks-alleged-sources-life-in-prison\/?cid=hp:mainpromo2\" class=\"gen\">17 d\u00e9cembre 2010<\/a> des pr\u00e9cisions sur les conditions de d\u00e9tention de Manning, d&rsquo;apr\u00e8s des informations de l&rsquo;avocat du soldat emprisonn\u00e9.)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tAujourd&rsquo;hui, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.independent.co.uk\/news\/uk\/home-news\/assange-begins-mansion-arrest-but-his-source-feels-the-heat-2163607.html\" class=\"gen\">18 d\u00e9cembre 2010<\/a>, Kim Sengupta donne dans <em>The Independent<\/em> de nombreux d\u00e9tails sur la fa\u00e7on dont le Syst\u00e8me entendrait utiliser Manning, essentiellement en en faisant un t\u00e9moin \u00e0 charge contre Assange, de fa\u00e7on \u00e0 renforcer d\u00e9cisivement le dossier de demande d&rsquo;extradition. L\u00e0 aussi, on retrouve les m\u00e9thodes staliniennes pour les montages de proc\u00e8s comme le r\u00e9gime \u00e9tait coutumier. <\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00ab<em>Yesterday US sources revealed that prosecutors are awaiting a decision from the American Attorney-General, Eric Holder, on what form of plea bargaining they should offer to Manning in return for him incriminating Mr Assange as a fellow conspirator in disseminating the classified information.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>Officials at the US Justice Department, who are under acute pressure to prosecute, privately acknowledge that a conviction against Mr Assange would be extremely difficult if he was simply the passive recipient of the material disseminated by Private Manning. Any evidence that he had actively facilitated the leak, however, would make extradition and a successful case much more feasible.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>Friends of Private Manning stress that so far he has refused to co-operate with the prosecutors. However, they also say that after seven months of solitary confinement in at the Quantico Marine Base in Virginia he is in an increasingly fragile condition<\/em>  []<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>Robert Feldman, a US lawyer specialising on security issues, said: We kind of have a picture of a troubled young man with obvious problems. Yet no one in the Army system picked this up and he was allowed access to secret information. And we also see security around the place was pretty loose.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>So a trial would be embarrassing to the DoD [Department of Defence] whatever happens. But, if they can prove complicity in the part of Assange in organising the leaks, then a picture can be drawn of an Assange, an older man, who manipulated an emotionally disturbed younger man. But to do this they obviously need evidence of complicity.<\/em> []<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>And, in what is seen as the determination of the authorities to pursue a prosecution, a number of hackers have claimed they have been offered financial inducements in return for associating with WikiLeaks and gathering evidence of wrongdoing.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>One computer specialist told the Washington Post said the US Army offered him money to infiltrate the website, but he turned it down because  I don&rsquo;t&rsquo; want anything to do with cloak and dagger stuff. An Army criminal investigation division spokesman told the newspaper We&rsquo;ve got an ongoing investigation.We don&rsquo;t discuss our techniques and tactics.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tL&rsquo;acharnement est manifeste et tient manifestement \u00e0 des motifs encore plus passionnels que tactiques ou manipulatoires. Comme le remarque Assange, \u00ab<em>a lot of face has been lost by some people<\/em>\u00bb, et l&rsquo;on pourrait dire que ces gens sont en fait, dans leurs cas, des repr\u00e9sentants du Syst\u00e8me qui a lui-m\u00eame perdu la face dans cette affaire. Dans ces occurrences, on ne peut que r\u00e9p\u00e9ter et amplifier diverses remarques que nous avons d\u00e9j\u00e0 faites, sur le jeu extr\u00eamement risqu\u00e9 que joue le Syst\u00e8me, pour des gains qui restent \u00e0 d\u00e9montrer. D&rsquo;une certaine fa\u00e7on, en r\u00e9agissant comme il le fait, le Syst\u00e8me montre plus sa vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 que sa puissance, et il fait l&rsquo;aveu implicite que l&rsquo;action d&rsquo;Assange l&rsquo;a touch\u00e9 durement, dans tous les cas dans son extr\u00eame vanit\u00e9 de puissance (version syst\u00e9mique de la volont\u00e9 de puissance\u00a0\u00bb). Son action n&rsquo;est pas d&rsquo;une rapidit\u00e9 et d&rsquo;une efficacit\u00e9 telles qu&rsquo;elles pourraient servir d&rsquo;exemple propre \u00e0 d\u00e9courager d&rsquo;autres Assange, mais au contraire encalmin\u00e9e dans le juridisme, la manipulation voyante, le manque d&rsquo;imagination,  autant d&rsquo;aspects qui donnent \u00e0 la fois le temps et l&rsquo;id\u00e9e \u00e0 des \u00e9mules d&rsquo;Assange de se manifester ou d&rsquo;entrer sur le sentier de la guerre.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tEnfin, on ne peut que r\u00e9p\u00e9ter que la longueur que sont en train de prendre les diverses batailles juridiques, les pol\u00e9miques, les interf\u00e9rences l\u00e9gales, etc., alimente l&rsquo;id\u00e9e d&rsquo;une pers\u00e9cution contre Assange, en m\u00eame temps que le sort ill\u00e9gal et d\u00e9testable fait au soldat Manning met en \u00e9vidence les m\u00e9thodes totalitaires du Syst\u00e8me. Ce sont autant de circonstances pour que la mobilisation en faveur d&rsquo;Assange et de Manning se renforce et grandisse encore. Curieusement et contre son propre int\u00e9r\u00eat, emport\u00e9 et aveugl\u00e9 par la passion de la vanit\u00e9 bless\u00e9e, le Syst\u00e8me fixe la crise <em>Cablegate<\/em> dans un m\u00e9canisme de constant rappel de l&rsquo;existence de cette affaire, de constant appel \u00e0 la mobilisation de contestation.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p><p>\tMis en ligne le 18 d\u00e9cembre 2010 \u00e0 12H20<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>D&rsquo;une fa\u00e7on g\u00e9n\u00e9rale, on pourrait observer que le Syst\u00e8me, vis-\u00e0-vis des divers acteurs dans l&rsquo;affaire Cablegate, se conduit \u00e0 peu pr\u00e8s comme le r\u00e9gime stalinien. Pas de surprise \u00e0 avoir, la parent\u00e9 entre les bureaucraties (la stalinienne et l&rsquo;am\u00e9ricaniste) \u00e9tant patente. On dira simplement que la m\u00e9thode stalinienne \u00e9tait plus rude et moins sophistiqu\u00e9e, et&hellip;&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[9886,10579,2631,6708,3616,6615,3084,2779,10574,10576,5969,10577,7418],"class_list":["post-72595","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-assange","tag-coerecition","tag-de","tag-incompetence","tag-manipulation","tag-manning","tag-mobilisation","tag-puissance","tag-stazlinien","tag-trotsky","tag-vanite","tag-vindicte","tag-volonte"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/72595","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=72595"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/72595\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=72595"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=72595"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=72595"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}