2 janvier 2011<\/a>. Le texte donne tous les liens de r\u00e9f\u00e9rences n\u00e9cessaires.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00abA former New York Times reporter assailed for her incorrect reports about Iraq’s purported weapons of mass destruction is criticizing Julian Assange for being a bad journalist. Judith Miller took on the WikiLeaks founder during an appearance on Fox News Watch Saturday, arguing that Assange was a bad journalist because he didn’t care at all about attempting to verify the information that he was putting out, or determine whether or not it hurt anyone.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00bbFor many critics of the war in Iraq, that claim is likely to set off irony alarms. Miller has become famous for being the author of a 2002 New York Times article now debunked suggesting that Saddam Hussein had an active nuclear weapons program. Mr. Hussein’s dogged insistence on pursuing his nuclear ambitions, along with what defectors described in interviews as Iraq’s push to improve and expand Baghdad’s chemical and biological arsenals, have brought Iraq and the United States to the brink of war, Miller wrote.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00bbSenior Bush administration officials would soon use the article to argue for an invasion of Iraq.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00bbLying exile grifter Ahmad Chalabi fed her the worst of the nonsense designed to push America into toppling Saddam Hussein (and giving Iraq to him), and she pushed that nonsense into the newspaper of record. She got everything wrong, and for some insane reason, she remained employed at the Times until 2005, when she negotiated her separation from her longtime professional home.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00bbAs the Crooks and Liars blog points out, Miller once defended her reporting with the argument that it is not a journalist’s job to verify only to report inform readers of what they had been told. [M]y job isn’t to assess the government’s information and be an independent intelligence analyst myself. My job is to tell readers of the New York Times what the government thought about Iraq’s arsenal, she said.<\/em> []<\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00abMiller made her comment about Assange while arguing that organizations like WikiLeaks are part of the new journalism of the digital age. This is part of the new journalism, she said. Everybody’s just got to get used to it. If you have that much information, most of which is over-classified if the waste basket in the office is classified, someone’s going to leak it, she said.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n\tLa philosophie de Miller est parfaitement \u00e9tablie. L’\u00e9thique du m\u00e9tier de journaliste consiste \u00e0 v\u00e9rifier et \u00e0 recouper une information, pour avoir la confirmation que le mensonge (puisque information \u00e9gale mensonge) est bien le m\u00eame partout. Celui qui livre une information reconnue comme authentique par sa forme m\u00eame (un c\u00e2ble diplomatique) sans la recouper commet un manquement \u00e0 l’\u00e9thique professionnelle. Il s’agit bien d’une philosophie m\u00e9caniste, o\u00f9 ce qui importe est le processus de la chose, le fond lui-m\u00eame \u00e9tant de la responsabilit\u00e9 du Syst\u00e8me. Nul ne peut d\u00e9nier que Miller ne soit pas logique, et parfaite appoint\u00e9e du Syst\u00e8me, de cette nouvelle cat\u00e9gorie humaine qui m\u00e9riterait l’institutionnalisation de sapiens<\/em>-Syst\u00e8me. [Nous incluons volontiers cette expression de sapiens<\/em>-Syst\u00e8me dans la nomenclature de dedefensa.org<\/em> ; nous ne manquerons pas d’en user abondamment.]<\/p>\n<\/p>\n\n
dedefensa.org<\/em><\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"L’\u00e9thique du mensonge contre Julian Assange C’est une circonstance de plus o\u00f9 le souffle nous en est coup\u00e9. C’est une \u00e9poque saccad\u00e9e, qui vous coupe le souffle \u00e0 chaque instant, \u00e0 lire les extraordinaires p\u00e9roraisons orwelliennes et virtualistes \u00e0 r\u00e9p\u00e9tition de sapiens-Syst\u00e8me, qui \u00e9carte comme une incongruit\u00e9 inf\u00e2me la m\u00e9moire de ses propres mystifications pour… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[14],"tags":[10664,4553,10666,10668,4299],"class_list":["post-72630","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-ouverture-libre","tag-assabnge","tag-miller","tag-recoupees","tag-sapiens-systeme","tag-sources"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/72630","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=72630"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/72630\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=72630"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=72630"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=72630"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}