Le Dallas News<\/em> rapporte, le 31 janvier 2011<\/a> la position cat\u00e9gorique, et \u00e9videmment tout \u00e0 fait justifi\u00e9e et logique, de Ron Paul sur la crise \u00e9gyptienne. Pour Ron Paul, la v\u00e9ritable cause de la crise se trouve dans la politique de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 nationale US, son interventionnisme, sa manipulation et sa corruption des gouvernements et des dirigeants. M\u00eame si c’est l’\u00e9vidence, il est excellent de l’entendre clamer de temps en temps.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00abThis is a typical example of what happens when we run on intervention-type foreign policies. We get in the middle of these fights. We’ve been in the middle of this for 30 years now. We’ve given Mubarak $60 billion. We’re responsible for a lot of the mess that is over there, Paul said this afternoon on FOX News Channel’s Your World with Neil Cavuto.<\/em> []<\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00bbAs for concerns that the fundamentalist Muslim Brotherhood, or even Al-Qaeda, would fill the power vacuum if Mubarak is forced out, Paul said the real problem stems from a U.S. habit of propping up authoritarian leaders. Both Mubarak and the deposed Shah of Iran became targets of popular revolt because they were our puppet government, he said. There was a blowback to us and you had an unintended consequence, he said. Yes, I think we have to worry about the radicals, but we have to understand how they get their motivation.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n \tCette intervention de Ron Paul est mise en parall\u00e8le avec celle de son fils Rand, qui \u00e9voquait la possibilit\u00e9 d’abandonner l’aide \u00e0 Isra\u00ebl (voir le 28 janvier 2011<\/a>). Ces d\u00e9clarations ont amen\u00e9 aussit\u00f4t une r\u00e9actions de 6 s\u00e9nateurs d\u00e9mocrates prestement rassembl\u00e9s au garde \u00e0 vous par le Lobby<\/em> [sioniste], et condamnant \u00e9videmment la seule \u00e9vocation de l’abandon de cette aide (voir le Jerusalem Post<\/em> du 2 f\u00e9vrier 2011<\/a>)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n \tL’int\u00e9r\u00eat de la chose est surtout que la situation en Egypte a fait surgir au premier plan la question de l’\u00e9ventuelle suppression de l’aide US \u00e0 ce pays ($1,5 milliard, second montant apr\u00e8s les $3 milliards \u00e0 Isra\u00ebl), dans un contexte de crise budg\u00e9taire o\u00f9 le principe g\u00e9n\u00e9ral de l’aide \u00e0 l’\u00e9tranger est mis en question, notamment par les \u00e9lus proches de Tea Party<\/em>. Toutes ces prises de position ont donc un lien, \u00e9galement avec la crise en Egypte, et les positions des deux Paul sont d\u00e9nonc\u00e9es par l’anath\u00e8me d’isolationnisme.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n \n dedefensa.org<\/em><\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" L’Egypte selon Ron Paul Le Dallas News rapporte, le 31 janvier 2011 la position cat\u00e9gorique, et \u00e9videmment tout \u00e0 fait justifi\u00e9e et logique, de Ron Paul sur la crise \u00e9gyptienne. Pour Ron Paul, la v\u00e9ritable cause de la crise se trouve dans la politique de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 nationale US, son interventionnisme, sa manipulation et sa corruption… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[14],"tags":[831,5110,2774,2854,3816,3140,2895],"class_list":["post-72718","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-ouverture-libre","tag-a","tag-aide","tag-israel","tag-letranger","tag-lobby","tag-paul","tag-rand"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/72718","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=72718"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/72718\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=72718"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=72718"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=72718"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}