{"id":72760,"date":"2011-02-15T13:42:38","date_gmt":"2011-02-15T13:42:38","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2011\/02\/15\/ron-paul-prepare-t-il-sa-campagne\/"},"modified":"2011-02-15T13:42:38","modified_gmt":"2011-02-15T13:42:38","slug":"ron-paul-prepare-t-il-sa-campagne","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2011\/02\/15\/ron-paul-prepare-t-il-sa-campagne\/","title":{"rendered":"Ron Paul pr\u00e9pare-t-il sa campagne ?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><h4>Ron Paul pr\u00e9pare-t-il sa campagne ?<\/h4>\n<p>Ou bien, disons : tout se passe comme si Ron Paul commen\u00e7ait \u00e0 tester les possibilit\u00e9s d&rsquo;une campagne \u00e9lectorale pour les pr\u00e9sidentielles de 2012, \u00e0 l&rsquo;aide de quelques ballons d&rsquo;essai Ainsi, sur MSNBC, dans l&rsquo;\u00e9mission <em>Morning Joe<\/em>, comme le rapporte <em>RAW Story<\/em> du <a href=\"http:\/\/www.rawstory.com\/rs\/2011\/02\/14\/congressman-ron-paul-slams-obama-hes-a-warmonger\/\" class=\"gen\">14 f\u00e9vrier 2011<\/a>. (A noter : deux m\u00e9dias, MSNBC et <em>RAW Story<\/em>, plus progressistes que conservateurs.) Deux sujets sont abord\u00e9s.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t L&rsquo;\u00e9lection pr\u00e9sidentielle Quelles chances aurait-il contre Obama ? R\u00e9ponse surprenante mais sans surprise : plus que de gagner la nomination du parti r\u00e9publicain, notamment et essentiellement parce que son \u00e9lectorat d\u00e9passe largement ce parti. Conclusion (confirmation pour notre compte) : si Ron Paul veut \u00eatre un candidat s\u00e9rieux, il doit se pr\u00e9senter comme ind\u00e9pendant.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00ab<em>The reality is it would be very, very difficult, Rep Paul (R-TX) said on MSNBC&rsquo;s Morning Joe. But if you look at the polls, and there aren&rsquo;t that many, my appeal is to a lot of independents and a lot of progressive Democrats who are sick and tired of Obama for opting out of cutting back on some of this militarism.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>He&rsquo;s a war monger, Rep. Paul added. He&rsquo;s expanding the war. My numbers would be much bigger running against Obama than they will be running against some conservative in the Republican primary.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t Sur les questions de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 nationale, Ron Paul nuance son discours : anti-guerre mais pas anti-d\u00e9fense.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00ab<em>I think the problem we have is with the semantics<\/em> [] <em>They have conditioned us all to use the word defense spending. Who wants to cut defense? I don&rsquo;t want to cut defense. I want a stronger defense.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>I want to cut the militarism, the interventionism, the stuff that hurts us, that makes us more vulnerable, he continued. If we separate defense from militarism, maybe more people would be willing to accept it. Who wants to be on record who says I just voted against the defense budget. I think it&rsquo;s a perception and a semantics problem that we have to try to reeducate the people to understand what we&rsquo;re talking about.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>\n<p class=\"signature\"><em>dedefensa.org<\/em><\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Ron Paul pr\u00e9pare-t-il sa campagne ? Ou bien, disons : tout se passe comme si Ron Paul commen\u00e7ait \u00e0 tester les possibilit\u00e9s d&rsquo;une campagne \u00e9lectorale pour les pr\u00e9sidentielles de 2012, \u00e0 l&rsquo;aide de quelques ballons d&rsquo;essai Ainsi, sur MSNBC, dans l&rsquo;\u00e9mission Morning Joe, comme le rapporte RAW Story du 14 f\u00e9vrier 2011. (A noter :&hellip;&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[14],"tags":[7928,3554,3140,3340,3310],"class_list":["post-72760","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-ouverture-libre","tag-7928","tag-anti-guerre","tag-paul","tag-presidentielles","tag-ron"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/72760","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=72760"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/72760\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=72760"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=72760"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=72760"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}