{"id":72850,"date":"2011-03-17T11:52:51","date_gmt":"2011-03-17T11:52:51","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2011\/03\/17\/la-gravite-de-la-crise-nucleaire-le-monde-versus-le-japon\/"},"modified":"2011-03-17T11:52:51","modified_gmt":"2011-03-17T11:52:51","slug":"la-gravite-de-la-crise-nucleaire-le-monde-versus-le-japon","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2011\/03\/17\/la-gravite-de-la-crise-nucleaire-le-monde-versus-le-japon\/","title":{"rendered":"La gravit\u00e9 de la crise nucl\u00e9aire : le monde versus<\/em> le Japon"},"content":{"rendered":"

La gravit\u00e9 de la crise nucl\u00e9aire : le monde versus<\/em> le Japon<\/h4>\n

La situation de l’\u00e9valuation de la crise nucl\u00e9aire au Japon est marqu\u00e9e par une extraordinaire diff\u00e9rence d’appr\u00e9ciation du jugement de la gravit\u00e9 de cette crise entre les autorit\u00e9s japonaises d’une part, la plupart des organisations internationales et des grands pays d’autre part. Le jugement communiqu\u00e9 hier \u00e0 une commission de l’Assembl\u00e9e Nationale par le ministre fran\u00e7ais Besson selon lequel la crise japonaise pourrait s’av\u00e9rer pire que Tchernobyl est largement partag\u00e9 par le reste de la communaut\u00e9 internationale, au contraire de l’\u00e9valuation g\u00e9n\u00e9rale qu’en font les autorit\u00e9s japonaises ; devant les d\u00e9put\u00e9s europ\u00e9ens, le Commissaire \u00e0 l’\u00e9nergie de la Commission europ\u00e9enne a estim\u00e9 que le mot apocalypse \u00e9tait appropri\u00e9 pour d\u00e9crire la situation. (On pourrait y ajouter ce d\u00e9tail, signal\u00e9 par EUObserver<\/em> le 17 mars 2011<\/a>, du m\u00eame, d\u00e9cid\u00e9ment tr\u00e8s biblique : \u00abThe nuclear crisis in Japan is now in the hands of God, the EU’s energy commissioner, Guenther Oettinger, has said, rattling financial markets…<\/em>\u00bb)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tCet aspect de la situation de la crise est rapport\u00e9 par le Guardian<\/em>, ce 16 mars 2011<\/a><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00abInternational concern that Japan has lost control over the nuclear crisis is escalating as Britain, France and other countries advised their citizens to consider leaving Tokyo because of heightened radiation levels. Yukiya Amano, head of the International Atomic Energy Agency, said he would visit the Japanese capital to gather information about the very serious situation at the Fukushima plant.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbConflicting reports from the damaged nuclear plant have deepened alarm over Japan’s management of the crisis, leading to charges that the authorities are actually making the situation worse.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbGregory Jaczko, who heads the US nuclear regulator, said Japan had failed to order a big enough evacuation. He told Congress the public should get at least 50 miles away from the stricken plant. The Japanese cleared a radius of 12 miles. He raised further fears by saying that all the water had evaporated from one of the spent fuel pools at the nuclear plant, so there was nothing to stop the fuel rods from getting hotter. Jaczko said officials believe radiation levels are extremely high, which could affect workers’ ability to stop temperatures rising.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbThe EU’s energy chief, G\u00fcnther Oettinger, told the European parliament the situation was out of control. We are somewhere between a disaster and a major disaster, he said. There could be further catastrophic events, which could pose a threat to the lives of people on the island. He said it was impossible to exclude the worst, adding: There is talk of an apocalypse and I think the word is particularly well chosen.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbThe partial meltdown at Fukushima appeared more serious than the Three Mile Island accident in 1979, the US energy secretary, Steven Chu, told Congress.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbChina, which had been driving a global revival of the nuclear industry, announced it was putting construction on hold, and ordered safety reviews at existing facilities. The heightened concerns six days after a devastating earthquake and tsunami plunged Japan into a humanitarian as well as a nuclear emergency brought criticism of the authorities’ management of the situation at Fukushima.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbYuli Andreyev, former head of the agency tasked with cleaning up after Chernobyl, told the Guardian the Japanese had failed to grasp the scale of the disaster. He also said the authorities had to be willing to sacrifice nuclear response workers for the good of the greater public, and should not only be deploying a skeleton staff. They don’t know what to do, he said. The personnel have been removed and those that remain are stretched.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbKenneth Bergeron, a physicist who has done research on nuclear accident simulation, said Three Mile Island had shown the importance of bringing in outside experts. I am concerned that the management of this accident was left to very local hands for a very long time, he said. Sometimes the managers and operators in place when the accident has taken place are not well qualified. They may have the inability to see the big picture.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\n

dedefensa.org<\/em><\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

La gravit\u00e9 de la crise nucl\u00e9aire : le monde versus le Japon La situation de l’\u00e9valuation de la crise nucl\u00e9aire au Japon est marqu\u00e9e par une extraordinaire diff\u00e9rence d’appr\u00e9ciation du jugement de la gravit\u00e9 de cette crise entre les autorit\u00e9s japonaises d’une part, la plupart des organisations internationales et des grands pays d’autre part. Le… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[14],"tags":[4012,10937,10939,6351,7203],"class_list":["post-72850","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-ouverture-libre","tag-apocalypse","tag-appreciations","tag-bersson","tag-gravite","tag-tchernobyl"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/72850","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=72850"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/72850\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=72850"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=72850"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=72850"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}