{"id":72914,"date":"2011-04-09T18:40:47","date_gmt":"2011-04-09T18:40:47","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2011\/04\/09\/obama-reste-en-etat-de-marche-mais-a-quel-prix\/"},"modified":"2011-04-09T18:40:47","modified_gmt":"2011-04-09T18:40:47","slug":"obama-reste-en-etat-de-marche-mais-a-quel-prix","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2011\/04\/09\/obama-reste-en-etat-de-marche-mais-a-quel-prix\/","title":{"rendered":"Obama reste en \u00e9tat de marche, mais \u00e0 quel prix\u2026"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><h3>Obama reste en \u00e9tat de marche, mais \u00e0 quel prix<\/h3>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tLe gouvernement \u00e0 Washington continue \u00e0 fonctionner, <em>in extremis<\/em>Pour commenter l&rsquo;accord de derni\u00e8re minute de Barack Obama avec le <em>Speaker<\/em> r\u00e9publicain de la Chambre des Repr\u00e9sentants, John Boehner, nous avons choisi Michael Tomasky, que nous avions d\u00e9j\u00e0 choisi le <a href=\"http:\/\/www.dedefensa.org\/article-gouvernance_en_faillite_07_04_2011.html\" class=\"gen\">7 avril 2011<\/a>, pour pr\u00e9senter la crise.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tDans un tr\u00e8s court billet, ce <a href=\"http:\/\/www.guardian.co.uk\/commentisfree\/michaeltomasky\/2011\/apr\/09\/barack-obama-us-federal-government-shutdown-averted-but-where-does-obama-stand\" class=\"gen\">9 avril 2011<\/a>, dans le <em>Guardian<\/em>, Tomasky pr\u00e9sente, avec une r\u00e9elle et profonde amertume, l&rsquo;accord qui est en fait une victoire r\u00e9publicaine presque compl\u00e8te. Partisan fid\u00e8le et constant de son pr\u00e9sident pr\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9, Tomasky se demande jusqu&rsquo;o\u00f9 Obama c\u00e9dera aux r\u00e9publicains pour \u00e9viter les affrontements, et jusqu&rsquo;\u00e0 quand il conservera encore le soutien des lib\u00e9raux US. Les r\u00e9publicains, eux, se pr\u00e9parent d\u00e9j\u00e0 \u00e0 la prochaine \u00e9preuve de force o\u00f9 ils feront \u00e0 nouveau c\u00e9der Obama. <\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00ab<em> So we have a deal and a government<\/em> []<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em> But the $38 billion cut is the largest single-year cut in the history of the country, according to the president, who taped a three-minute video statement shortly after 11 pm Friday night, when the deal was announced by Speaker John Boehner<\/em> []<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em> I understand what Obama is doing when he talks, as he does in the video, about the government needing to live within its means<\/em> []<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em> But but but: to hear Obama kinda-sorta boasting about overseeing a domestic spending cut on a scale that even Ronald Reagan never managed leaves one wondering where and over what he might someday draw a line in the sand.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>Last December, he signed George W. Bush&rsquo;s tax cuts. Then he introduced his own budget, which include a five-year pay freeze for federal employees and cut funding for a couple of subsidy programs for poor and elderly people. Finally, during this whole process, he never once that I can remember made a forceful public statement singling out a GOP cut as severe or unwise, never defended family planning initiatives, never pointed to one thing and said, this I will not brook.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>Yes, I understand, liberals are outnumbered. I&rsquo;m more understanding of that than most liberals I know, believe me. And Republicans have power now, and they&rsquo;re extreme, and this is the way it&rsquo;s going to be for a little while at least. But any skillful politician can find ways to communicate to the middle and his base simultaneously. He just has to want to.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>\n<p class=\"signature\"><em>dedefensa.org<\/em><\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Obama reste en \u00e9tat de marche, mais \u00e0 quel prix Le gouvernement \u00e0 Washington continue \u00e0 fonctionner, in extremisPour commenter l&rsquo;accord de derni\u00e8re minute de Barack Obama avec le Speaker r\u00e9publicain de la Chambre des Repr\u00e9sentants, John Boehner, nous avons choisi Michael Tomasky, que nous avions d\u00e9j\u00e0 choisi le 7 avril 2011, pour pr\u00e9senter la&hellip;&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[14],"tags":[10771,2762,5310,11009,8980],"class_list":["post-72914","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-ouverture-libre","tag-boehner","tag-extremiste","tag-republicains","tag-shutdown","tag-tomasky"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/72914","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=72914"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/72914\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=72914"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=72914"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=72914"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}