{"id":72929,"date":"2011-04-16T13:56:01","date_gmt":"2011-04-16T13:56:01","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2011\/04\/16\/bho-cameron-sarko-ou-le-prix-des-tomates\/"},"modified":"2011-04-16T13:56:01","modified_gmt":"2011-04-16T13:56:01","slug":"bho-cameron-sarko-ou-le-prix-des-tomates","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2011\/04\/16\/bho-cameron-sarko-ou-le-prix-des-tomates\/","title":{"rendered":"BHO-Cameron-Sarko ou le prix des tomates?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><h4>BHO-Cameron-Sarko ou le prix des tomates?<\/h4>\n<p>Steve Clemons a eu l&rsquo;heureuse et riche id\u00e9e, sur son site <em>The Washington Note<\/em> le <a href=\"http:\/\/www.thewashingtonnote.com\/archives\/2011\/04\/article_on_pric\/\" class=\"gen\">15 avril 2011<\/a>, de relever quelques-unes des caract\u00e9ristiques techniques et autres de la pr\u00e9sentation et du succ\u00e8s de lecture \u00e9ventuel de l&rsquo;article commun BHO-Cameron-Sarko sur la Libye. D&rsquo;abord, on notera la diff\u00e9rence des titres, qu&rsquo;on jugera \u00e9videmment significative par rapport \u00e0 l&rsquo;humeur de Sarkozy, entre la version fran\u00e7aise (\u00ab<em>Kadhafi doit partir<\/em>\u00bb) et la version anglo-saxonne (\u00ab<em>Libya&rsquo;s Pathway to Peace<\/em>\u00bb) ; la diff\u00e9rence, sans aucun doute voulue du c\u00f4t\u00e9 fran\u00e7ais par Sarko lui-m\u00eame pour qu&rsquo;on sache de quel c\u00f4t\u00e9 se trouvent la justice et les mecs qui en imposent, rend parfaitement justice \u00e0 la pauvret\u00e9 de caract\u00e8re et \u00e0 la bassesse d&rsquo;esprit du <em>sapiens<\/em> de l&rsquo;Elys\u00e9e. La messe est dite, avec concert de <em>rock<\/em>, par notre pr\u00e9sident-<em>Prisunic<\/em>. Un autre aspect de la publication du <em>Figaro<\/em>, journal proche du cur de Sarko, est la teneur des commentaires o\u00f9 le titre-slogan Kadhafi doit partir a largement aliment\u00e9 un commentaire-slogan Sarkozy doit partir.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tClemons, lui, s&rsquo;attache, en bon washingtonien, \u00e0 l&rsquo;aspect am\u00e9ricaniste de la publication. Il rel\u00e8ve que le NYT, comme le <em>Times<\/em> de Londres, et au contraire du <em>Figaro<\/em> o\u00f9 l&rsquo;on a le souci de la hi\u00e9rarchie, ne met pas l&rsquo;article en premi\u00e8re page. Le <em>Times<\/em> de Londres le met m\u00eame dans son domaine payant Tout cela pour arriver \u00e0 noter que, dans le NYT (rubrique <em>oped<\/em>), l&rsquo;article vient apr\u00e8s les 25 articles les plus lus, juteusement battu par le 25\u00e8me qui a comme th\u00e8me le prix des tomates.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00ab<em>First of all, only in Le Figaro did the article by the three heads of state get blaring prominence on the paper&rsquo;s homepage. It was the big, main item in the French case  and in Le Figaro, Sarkozy got top billing, followed by Obama, and then Cameron.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>In the British case of The Times, the lead article on the paper&rsquo;s homepage is not the oped but rather a piece reporting that the Tories are offering strong counsel to David Cameron to seek a broader mandate on Libya given what he said in the op-ed. The op-ed itself was buried in the piece, but there was a modest link to it.<\/em> []<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>The Brits interestingly don&rsquo;t take top billing for their guy on the piece as the French did. They give top billing to Barack Obama  then Cameron, followed by Sarkozy.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>And then there is the New York Times in which Obama got top billing, followed by Cameron and then Sarkozy. The article titled Libya&rsquo;s Pathway to Peace did not appear at all on the front page of the New York Times website, and was fairly well buried even on the opinion page of the site.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>Interestingly, while the article was the 2nd most linked article by bloggers  the joint oped did very poorly in terms of the number of times readers emailed it out. It didn&rsquo;t even make the top 25 most emailed articles. Indeed, a story on the price of tomatoes beat out the Obama-Cameron-Sarkozy piece as the 25th most emailed item.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>\n<p class=\"signature\"><em>dedefensa.org<\/em><\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>BHO-Cameron-Sarko ou le prix des tomates? Steve Clemons a eu l&rsquo;heureuse et riche id\u00e9e, sur son site The Washington Note le 15 avril 2011, de relever quelques-unes des caract\u00e9ristiques techniques et autres de la pr\u00e9sentation et du succ\u00e8s de lecture \u00e9ventuel de l&rsquo;article commun BHO-Cameron-Sarko sur la Libye. D&rsquo;abord, on notera la diff\u00e9rence des titres,&hellip;&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[14],"tags":[4467,10891,6902],"class_list":["post-72929","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-ouverture-libre","tag-figaro","tag-kadhafi","tag-libye"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/72929","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=72929"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/72929\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=72929"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=72929"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=72929"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}