Que s’est-il pass\u00e9 \u00e0 Washington ? Paul Harris, du Guardian<\/em>, r\u00e9sume, ce 5 mai 2011<\/a>, l’extraordinaire \u00e9volution de l’op\u00e9ration d’\u00e9limination de ben Laden Comment une op\u00e9ration pr\u00e9par\u00e9e dans le plus grand secret, avec minutie et ma\u00eetrise, r\u00e9alis\u00e9e \u00e0 la satisfaction de ses initiateurs, pr\u00e9sent\u00e9e et d\u00e9taill\u00e9e par un pr\u00e9sident extraordinairement ma\u00eetre de lui, comment ce triomphe se transforme en d\u00e9route. On a d\u00e9j\u00e0 vu<\/a> le cas, mais, ici, le d\u00e9tail des circonstances m\u00e9rite d’\u00eatre donn\u00e9, pour faire mesurer l’\u00e9tonnante confusion qui s’est brutalement abattue sur la Maison Blanche.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n \tWashington est stup\u00e9fait, observe Harris. Depuis le discours d’Obama annon\u00e7ant la mort de ben Laden, la Maison-Blanche, le pr\u00e9sident, son porte-parole, ont accompli un parcours de cauchemar, r\u00e9alisant une d\u00e9route en mati\u00e8re de relations publiques. On dirait ainsi que le domaine du syst\u00e8me du technologisme a \u00e9t\u00e9 parfaitement satisfait (triomphe), et que celui du syst\u00e8me de la communication a tourn\u00e9 au cauchemar (d\u00e9route) ; dans une occasion aussi grave, d’une fa\u00e7on extr\u00eamement claire, sans doute peut-on distinguer parfaitement la marque psychologique du pr\u00e9sident Obama, avec ses qualit\u00e9s exceptionnelles et les d\u00e9fauts tout aussi grands de ces qualit\u00e9s, qui conduisent d’une ma\u00eetrise et d’un calme exemplaires dans l’action, une fois l’action d\u00e9cid\u00e9e (technologisme), \u00e0 l’h\u00e9sitation, l’absence de fermet\u00e9 et une certaine paresse de la d\u00e9cision, l’improvisation forc\u00e9e dans tous les sens que cela implique (communication) Lequel de ces deux \u00e9v\u00e9nements est le plus importante ? Dans le r\u00e9gime qu’impose le Syst\u00e8me, on est \u00e9videmment conduit \u00e0 observer que l’essentiel c’est la perception. On devine de quelle c\u00f4t\u00e9 pencherait la gravit\u00e9 du jugement<\/p>\n<\/p>\n \tApr\u00e8s avoir rappel\u00e9 le triomphe, Harris d\u00e9crit donc la d\u00e9route.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00abIt was all so cool and collected.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00bbWhich makes the Obama administration’s collective response to the aftermath of the shooting of Bin Laden so baffling. Having actually caught and killed the west’s ultimate terrorist bogeyman, the White House has been busy messing up the aftermath with a display of PR ineptness that is remarkable. The White House, seemingly, can’t get its facts straight.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00bbFirst, officials say Bin Laden went down in a firefight, shooting back while using a woman as a human shield. Then, it turns out he was unarmed when shot. The woman also turned out to be his wife and she was running at US troops when she was shot.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00bbFirst, there was a fierce, 40-minute firefight in the Abbottabad villa. Then, it turns out only one of the people slain in the raid had a gun that he fired and he was killed in the first few minutes.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00bbFirst, Bin Laden’s son Hamza was meant to have been killed. Then, it was changed to Khalid.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00bbFirst, Bin Laden’s house was said to be worth a million dollars, but local real estate experts valued it at $250,000.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00bbOfficials argue they have made mistakes because they attempted to get facts quickly into the public domain from what was, no doubt, a confused fog of war. That’s a good reason for the mess. But it is no excuse for it.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00bbWhat happened to the calm and level heads of last weekend? It you don’t know the full facts, then don’t release any of them. That is basic PR stuff.<\/em> []<\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00bbTo add to this mess has been the foolish to-and-fro over the release of death pictures of Bin Laden. First, it seemed the White House would release a photograph of Bin Laden’s corpse. Then, it backtracked a day later, saying it would not. President Obama has given an interview saying no photograph will be published, but at this rate, the White House will probably change their mind again around this time next week<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n \n dedefensa.org<\/em><\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" De triomphe en d\u00e9route Que s’est-il pass\u00e9 \u00e0 Washington ? Paul Harris, du Guardian, r\u00e9sume, ce 5 mai 2011, l’extraordinaire \u00e9volution de l’op\u00e9ration d’\u00e9limination de ben Laden Comment une op\u00e9ration pr\u00e9par\u00e9e dans le plus grand secret, avec minutie et ma\u00eetrise, r\u00e9alis\u00e9e \u00e0 la satisfaction de ses initiateurs, pr\u00e9sent\u00e9e et d\u00e9taill\u00e9e par un pr\u00e9sident extraordinairement ma\u00eetre… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[14],"tags":[3015,2631,2651,9165,2622,6208,3099,5713,2766,11095,3014,4268],"class_list":["post-72981","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-ouverture-libre","tag-communication","tag-de","tag-du","tag-hesitation","tag-la","tag-obama","tag-psychologie","tag-publiques","tag-relations","tag-sang-froid","tag-systeme","tag-technologisme"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/72981","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=72981"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/72981\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=72981"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=72981"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=72981"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}