{"id":73043,"date":"2011-05-27T12:36:17","date_gmt":"2011-05-27T12:36:17","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2011\/05\/27\/la-deconstruction-destructuration-de-la-fed\/"},"modified":"2011-05-27T12:36:17","modified_gmt":"2011-05-27T12:36:17","slug":"la-deconstruction-destructuration-de-la-fed","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2011\/05\/27\/la-deconstruction-destructuration-de-la-fed\/","title":{"rendered":"La d\u00e9construction-d\u00e9structuration de la Fed<\/em>"},"content":{"rendered":"

De nouveaux d\u00e9tails sur des actions sp\u00e9cifiques de la Federal Reserve ont \u00e9t\u00e9 rendus publics par Bloomberg.News<\/em>, et un article de Huffington.post<\/em> du 26 mai 2011<\/a>, de William Alden, rapporte dans un premier temps les diverses pr\u00e9cisions ainsi obtenues. Il s’agit de la mise en lumi\u00e8re de pr\u00eats \u00e0 int\u00e9r\u00eat notablement aimables (0,01%), portant sur des sommes notablement app\u00e9ciables ($30 milliards ou plus, pour chacune des banques) faits par la Fed<\/em> \u00e0 plusieurs banques lors de la crise financi\u00e8re de 2008, notamment \u00e0 Goldman Sachs, \u00e0 la Royal Bank of Scotland et au Cr\u00e9dit Suisse<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00abIn the midst of the global financial crisis in 2008, the Federal Reserve lent Goldman Sachs, Credit Suisse and Royal Bank of Scotland at least $30 billion each at interest rates as low as 0.01 percent with no public disclosure of the details, Bloomberg News reported on Thursday. The latest revelations about the covert infusions of credit provided by the Fed to some of the world’s largest banks has amplified accusations that the central bank is a power unto itself, operating according to its own devices and in the interest of major financial institutions and beyond accountability to taxpayers.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbIt just points out that this was about secrecy to protect banks basically from embarrassment from transparency, which is not supposed to be what the Fed’s about, said Dean Baker, co-director of the Center for Economic Policy and Research, in Washington. That is the fundamental problem with the Fed, Baker added. They’re supposed to be an agency of the government, not an agency of the banks. But reflexively, there they are protecting the banks, again and again and again.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tDepuis plusieurs mois et m\u00eame depuis plus d’un an, divers \u00e9v\u00e9nements de r\u00e9v\u00e9lations sur les activit\u00e9s de la Fed<\/em> ont \u00e9t\u00e9 rendus publics, y compris par le biais de rapports officiels. (Voir Huffington.post<\/em> encore, le 26 avril 2011<\/a> : \u00abA newly-released study from the Congressional Research Service bolsters claims that the nation’s largest banks profited off the Federal Reserve’s financial crisis-era programs by borrowing cash for next to nothing, then lending it back to the federal government at substantially higher rates.<\/em>\u00bb)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tIl s’agit d’un mouvement g\u00e9n\u00e9ral, venu de diverses forces, milieux et autorit\u00e9s, qui conduit \u00e0 des r\u00e9v\u00e9lations de plus en plus nombreuses. L’article de Huffington.post<\/em> d\u00e9j\u00e0 cit\u00e9 du 27 mai 2011 en fait un rappel.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00abBut in recent months, the Fed has been forced by Congress and by a Supreme Court decision in a case originally filed by Bloomberg LP, the parent company of Bloomberg News to release the details of its so-called emergency lending programs. The Fed undertook those programs throughout 2008, accelerating its lending that fall in the aftermath of the collapse of the investment banking giant Lehman Brothers.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbIn December, under orders from Congress, the Fed released a trove of documents that name the recipients of $3.3 trillion in aid intended to curb damage from the developing financial crisis. The documents describe a variety of Fed special lending facilities, including one program in which nine firms, five of them foreign, were able to borrow $5 billion for 28 days at the extremely low interest rate of 0.0078 percent, The Huffington Post reported.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbIn late March, the Fed released information about its primary lending facility — the so-called discount window — which had provided ultra-cheap cash during the height of the crisis to a range of firms. During the week in October 2008 when borrowing under the program peaked, foreign banks received more than 70 percent of the $110.7 billion that the Fed lent out, Bloomberg News reported. Arab Banking Corp., a $28 billion lender now majority-owned by Libya’s central bank, got at least $3.2 billion that autumn, The Huffington Post reported.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbIn 2008, Bloomberg News asked for Fed records under the Freedom of Information Act, but the Fed resisted. Revealing the names of borrowers could cause substantial competitive harm to those institutions because they could be perceived as weak, the Fed argued in a court filing. [B]ecause Reserve Banks are the lenders of last resort,’ the fact that an institution is borrowing at the [discount window], if publicly disclosed, can fuel market speculation and rumors that the entity’s liquidity strains stem from a financial problem at the institution that is not publicly known, reads a May 2009 statement the Fed filed in a New York district court.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbThe case went to the Supreme Court, which rejected an attempt by a banking industry group to block the Fed’s disclosure. So,<\/em> for the first time<\/em><\/strong> since the Fed’s discount window began lending in 1914, the central bank in late March released the identities of its primary facility’s borrowers<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tCertes, nous avons soulign\u00e9, dans le dernier paragraphe de cette derni\u00e8re citation, l’expression for the first time<\/em> (depuis que la Federal Reserve, cr\u00e9\u00e9e en 1913, a commenc\u00e9, en 1914, sa politique de pr\u00eats). Cela indique, d’une fa\u00e7on g\u00e9n\u00e9rale, et pour les divers cas signal\u00e9s, le sort actuel de la Federal Reserve. C’est un mouvement de fond, \u00e0 partir de divers centres de pouvoir (Congr\u00e8s, Cour Supr\u00eame, entreprises de presse, etc.), qui est aujourd’hui en plein d\u00e9veloppement contre la Federal Reserve. C’est la politique de secret de la Federal Reserve, la fausse Banque Centrale US (fausse, puisque ayant une structure et un actionnariat d’institution financi\u00e8re priv\u00e9e<\/strong>), qui est ici mise tr\u00e8s gravement en cause et d\u00e9construite petit \u00e0 petit. L’on comprend combien, \u00e0 l’image de notre titre, nous pensons que le terme d\u00e9structuration convient mieux, m\u00eame si l’acte est celui d’une d\u00e9construction. C’est la substance m\u00eame de la Fed<\/em>, sous forme de sa structure, de ses pratiques, de ses normes, qui est ainsi attaqu\u00e9e et de plus en plus rogn\u00e9e, de plus en plus min\u00e9e.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tOn observe combien est grande la puissance de l’attaque contre la Fed<\/em>, avec des r\u00e9sultats qui ne cessent de s’accumuler. C’est \u00e9videmment une attaque contre le Syst\u00e8me, et non pas seulement contre un \u00e9l\u00e9ment de la puissance am\u00e9ricaniste strictement dite. Si nous parlons du Syst\u00e8me, c’est bien parce que tous les caract\u00e8res de la Fed<\/em> montrent qu’il s’agit bien de cela ; la Fed<\/em> est effectivement un organisme priv\u00e9, \u00e9chappant structurellement \u00e0 l’int\u00e9gration dans le gouvernement ou un syst\u00e8me du pouvoir am\u00e9ricaniste soi disant public ; son action ne se limite en aucun cas aux banques US mais concerne des banques non-US \u00e9galement, d\u00e8s lors que ces banques font partie de la structure g\u00e9n\u00e9rale du Syst\u00e8me, par essence non caract\u00e9ris\u00e9e ni par les fronti\u00e8res, ni par les nationalit\u00e9s. La Fed<\/em> est effectivement un instrument central (sic) et c’est bien un instrument central du Syst\u00e8me qui fait ainsi l’objet d’assauts puissants.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tOn observera enfin que la forme de ces \u00e9v\u00e9nements est effectivement une d\u00e9construction-d\u00e9structuration plut\u00f4t qu’une explosion, ou qu’un effondrement brutal, ou une mesure spectaculaire et sensationnelle. Cela n’entache en rien l’importance du processus, bien au contraire. A notre sens, ce processus n’est nullement termin\u00e9, chaque d\u00e9cision et mesure suppl\u00e9mentaire obligeant la Fed<\/em> \u00e0 c\u00e9der du terrain en attirant d’autres mesures contre elle, tout cela cr\u00e9ant des jurisprudences, des tendances fortes, un courant grandissant de d\u00e9structuration. Simplement, on doit avoir l’attention attir\u00e9e sur la forme m\u00eame du processus, pour pouvoir commencer \u00e0 r\u00e9fl\u00e9chir sur la forme que prendra, que prend d’ores et d\u00e9j\u00e0 l’effondrement du Syst\u00e8me Beaucoup plus un processus par \u00e0-coups, un v\u00e9ritable travail de termites<\/a> (encore cette r\u00e9f\u00e9rence, d\u00e9j\u00e0 signal\u00e9e dans notre Bloc-Notes<\/em> de ce m\u00eame 27 mai 2011<\/a>), qu’un Big Bang<\/em> tonitruant Le r\u00e9sultat n’en est pas moins impressionnant. Bien entendu, on observera pour conclure que ce r\u00e9sultat est obtenu par l’action d’autres centres de pouvoir du m\u00eame Syst\u00e8me auquel appartient la Fed<\/em>, confirmant l’activisme autodestructeur du Syst\u00e8me, et sa crise centrale et mortelle par cons\u00e9quent.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

\tMis en ligne le 27 mai 2011 \u00e0 12H34<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

De nouveaux d\u00e9tails sur des actions sp\u00e9cifiques de la Federal Reserve ont \u00e9t\u00e9 rendus publics par Bloomberg.News, et un article de Huffington.post du 26 mai 2011, de William Alden, rapporte dans un premier temps les diverses pr\u00e9cisions ainsi obtenues. Il s’agit de la mise en lumi\u00e8re de pr\u00eats \u00e0 int\u00e9r\u00eat notablement aimables (0,01%), portant sur… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[4270,11149,6676,3566,3228,7482,3907,2803,6937,5393,2670,8477,11150,4207,8478,3014],"class_list":["post-73043","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-autodestruction","tag-bang","tag-banques","tag-big","tag-crise","tag-deconstruction","tag-destructuration","tag-effondrement","tag-fed","tag-federal","tag-financiere","tag-goldman","tag-prets","tag-reserve","tag-sachs","tag-systeme"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/73043","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=73043"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/73043\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=73043"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=73043"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=73043"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}