{"id":73059,"date":"2011-06-02T08:43:55","date_gmt":"2011-06-02T08:43:55","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2011\/06\/02\/une-chambre-antiwar-et-hors-de-controle\/"},"modified":"2011-06-02T08:43:55","modified_gmt":"2011-06-02T08:43:55","slug":"une-chambre-antiwar-et-hors-de-controle","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2011\/06\/02\/une-chambre-antiwar-et-hors-de-controle\/","title":{"rendered":"Une Chambre antiwar<\/em> et hors de contr\u00f4le ?"},"content":{"rendered":"

Une Chambre antiwar<\/em> et hors de contr\u00f4le ?<\/h4>\n

Brusquement, la position du Congr\u00e8s, sp\u00e9cifiquement de la Chambre des Repr\u00e9sentants, devient un probl\u00e8me majeur pour la fameuse politique<\/a> de l’id\u00e9ologie et de l’instinct, et pour la politique belliciste poursuivie par Obama, \u00e0 partir de l’\u00e9lan de la pr\u00e9sidence GW Bush Et c’est d\u00e9sormais le Syst\u00e8me qui a un probl\u00e8me. Nous prolongeons, avec de nouveaux \u00e9v\u00e9nements, notre texte du 28 mai 2011<\/a>.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t Jason Ditz, sur Antiwar.com<\/em>, donne deux synth\u00e8ses aujourd’hui sur diverses positions au sein de la Chambre des Repr\u00e9sentants. Il y a une r\u00e9volte en gestation contre les co\u00fbts de la guerre en Afghanistan (voir ce 2 juin 2011<\/a>). Il y a une situation de quasi-r\u00e9volte concernant une loi contre la guerre en Libye, soutenue par un groupe bipartisan \u00e0 partir d’une proposition du d\u00e9put\u00e9 d\u00e9mocrate de gauche Kucinich, et dont la direction de la Chambre (le r\u00e9publicain Boehner) repousse le vote de crainte, simplement, que la loi soit vot\u00e9e (ce 2 juin 2011<\/a>).<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00abFor a nation in a state of perpetual war, antiwar votes are a time honored tradition giving the antiwar Congressmen a chance to act like they’re accomplishing something and their more jingoistic brethren a chance to give flag-waving speeches denouncing the resolution as treason. All that changed last week when one of those run-of-the-mill Afghan votes came within 9 members of passing.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbThe House had also been promising a vote sometime this week on a resolution demanding the end of the Libya War. Today, however, the Republican leadership announced it is postponing the vote indefinitely because of growing concern that it might actually pass.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbRep. Kucinich’s (D OH) bill is being further bolstered by an announcement today from the NATO leadership that they have extended the supposedly short-term war for another 90 days, saying they are determined to continue our operation. But with President Obama already well beyond his 60-day grace period, he is facing considerable opposition from both parties about his decision to launch the war.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t Le Washington Post<\/em> fait une large place, ce m\u00eame 2 juin 2011<\/a>, \u00e0 cette \u00e9trange situation \u00e0 la Chambre des Repr\u00e9sentants. Contr\u00f4l\u00e9e par un parti r\u00e9publicain f\u00e9rocement pro-guerre, elle se trouve presque hors du contr\u00f4le des directions du Syst\u00e8me \u00e0 cause d’un courant anti-guerre (antiwar<\/em>) qui se fait sur une base bipartisane, d\u00e9mocrates-r\u00e9publicains Le d\u00e9sordre lui-m\u00eame, en v\u00e9rit\u00e9, est hors de contr\u00f4le.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00abOn Wednesday, 74 days after U.S. forces joined the military operation in Libya, President Obama seemed to run out of goodwill on Capitol Hill. A group of both liberals and conservatives defying the leaders of both parties threw their support behind a bill to pull the U.S. military out of the Libya operation. That prospect led GOP leaders to shelve the bill before it came to a vote.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbThat episode signaled how abruptly the politics of U.S. warmaking have changed, as the intervention in Libya follows a bloody, weary decade in Afghanistan and Iraq. Now, a Democratic president has asked the country to support a new military action and missed a legal deadline that required him to get Congress’s authorization. In response, an antiwar movement has appeared in an unlikely place: a House dominated by the Republican right.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbWe are in control in the House, and we want something on the floor, said Rep. John Campbell (R-Calif.), one of a number of conservatives who called Wednesday for a showdown with Obama. Put a resolution up, and let us express… to the president that you no longer have the authority of this Congress to conduct military operations in that country.’<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\n

dedefensa.org<\/em><\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Une Chambre antiwar et hors de contr\u00f4le ? Brusquement, la position du Congr\u00e8s, sp\u00e9cifiquement de la Chambre des Repr\u00e9sentants, devient un probl\u00e8me majeur pour la fameuse politique de l’id\u00e9ologie et de l’instinct, et pour la politique belliciste poursuivie par Obama, \u00e0 partir de l’\u00e9lan de la pr\u00e9sidence GW Bush Et c’est d\u00e9sormais le Syst\u00e8me qui… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[14],"tags":[3236,10771,3359,2631,2604,4390,6330,8360,8361,6902,4607,6381],"class_list":["post-73059","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-ouverture-libre","tag-afghanistan","tag-boehner","tag-chambre","tag-de","tag-des","tag-et","tag-kucinich","tag-lideologie","tag-linstinct","tag-libye","tag-politique","tag-representants"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/73059","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=73059"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/73059\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=73059"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=73059"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=73059"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}