\tOu bien encore, absurdement grotesque, non pas l’in\u00e9galit\u00e9, l’injustice, etc., tous ces beaux discours qui partent des bons sentiments pour aboutir aux \u00e2mes corrompues, \u00e0 la r\u00e9volte id\u00e9ologique rempla\u00e7ant un mal par un autre, au d\u00e9couragement injustifi\u00e9e ; absurdit\u00e9 et grotesque, pour qualifier la sottise nihiliste, principalement n\u00e9e de sentiment aussi vide que la vanit\u00e9 par automatisme, caract\u00e9risant l’\u00e9volution humaine sous la protection du Syst\u00e8me ; sottise aussi profonde qu’un ab\u00eeme aussi sombre qu’un trou noir, se pr\u00eatant \u00e0 toutes les manipulations du Mal. (La vanit\u00e9, la sottise, surtout lorsqu’elles se d\u00e9veloppent comme des plantes de serre dans le cadre absolument corrupteur de la d\u00e9mocratie, cela devrait-il faire partie des crimes contre l’humanit\u00e9 ?) <\/p>\n<\/p>\n
\tL’absence totale<\/strong> de sentiment collectif est illustr\u00e9e par ces chiffres que nous allons mentionner comme ils l’ont d\u00e9j\u00e0 largement \u00e9t\u00e9, qui ne sont que des chiffres, de la comptabilit\u00e9, mais qui traduisent tout ce que cette contre-civilisation porte de valeurs inverties, de substance n\u00e9gative, absolument destructrice. La consid\u00e9ration dans ce sens doit nous arr\u00eater quelques instants, le temps de r\u00e9affirmer et raffermir une r\u00e9solution qui ne se pr\u00eate \u00e0 aucune alternative. On ne peut que vouloir<\/strong>, avec la plus grande s\u00e9r\u00e9nit\u00e9 du monde, la destruction totale, compl\u00e8te, jusqu’au plus profond de ses fondations, de cette chose, le Syst\u00e8me, cette contre-civilisation, ce produit du d\u00e9cha\u00eenement de la Mati\u00e8re. Rien d’autre n’est concevable, et la seule philosophie constructive et cr\u00e9atrice est celle de l’anath\u00e8me du vieux Caton face \u00e0 Carthage : delenda est<\/em>.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n \tReprenons, r\u00e9sumons et citons<\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t Nous apprenons donc que la masse totale des avoirs des super-riches planqu\u00e9s dans les paradis fiscaux pour \u00e9viter l’imp\u00f4t atteint au moins<\/strong> \u00a313.000 milliards (ou trillions<\/em>), et peut-\u00eatre jusqu’\u00e0 \u00a320.000 milliards (chiffre que certains ont pr\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9, pour transcrire en $31.000 milliards, alors que \u00a313.000 milliards correspond \u00e0 $21.000 milliards) ; soit, comme chacun peut le calculer, au moins<\/strong> autant que les PIB des USA et du Japon additionn\u00e9s. Le Guardian<\/em> (dans sa version The Observer<\/em>), abandonnant un moment sa croisade pour lib\u00e9rer la Syrie et lui donner acc\u00e8s \u00e0 notre Syst\u00e8me, nous donne effectivement, ce 22 juillet 2012<\/a> tous les d\u00e9tails sur cette situation. Sur les \u00a313.000 milliards, pr\u00e8s de la moiti\u00e9, soit \u00a36.300 milliards, vont \u00e0 92.000 personnes, soit 0,001% de la population mondiale ; le reste, ce sont les 99,999% comme vous et moi. (Ces deux derniers chiffres en arrondissant<\/a> quelque peu, mais sans gravit\u00e9, on conc\u00e9dera que l’esprit de la chose s’y trouve.)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00abA global super-rich elite has exploited gaps in cross-border tax rules to hide an extraordinary \u00a313 trillion ($21tn) of wealth offshore as much as the American and Japanese GDPs put together according to research commissioned by the campaign group Tax Justice Network. James Henry, former chief economist at consultancy McKinsey and an expert on tax havens, has compiled the most detailed estimates yet of the size of the offshore economy in a new report, The Price of Offshore Revisited, released exclusively to the Observer.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00bbHe shows that at least \u00a313tn perhaps up to \u00a320tn has leaked out of scores of countries into secretive jurisdictions such as Switzerland and the Cayman Islands with the help of private banks, which vie to attract the assets of so-called high net-worth individuals. Their wealth is, as Henry puts it, \u00ab\u00a0protected by a highly paid, industrious bevy of professional enablers in the private banking, legal, accounting and investment industries taking advantage of the increasingly borderless, frictionless global economy\u00a0\u00bb. According to Henry’s research, the top 10 private banks, which include UBS and Credit Suisse in Switzerland, as well as the US investment bank Goldman Sachs, managed more than \u00a34tn in 2010, a sharp rise from \u00a31.5tn five years earlier.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00bbThe detailed analysis in the report, compiled using data from a range of sources, including the Bank of International Settlements and the International Monetary Fund, suggests that for many developing countries the cumulative value of the capital that has flowed out of their economies since the 1970s would be more than enough to pay off their debts to the rest of the world. Oil-rich states with an internationally mobile elite have been especially prone to watching their wealth disappear into offshore bank accounts instead of being invested at home, the research suggests. Once the returns on investing the hidden assets is included, almost \u00a3500bn has left Russia since the early 1990s when its economy was opened up. Saudi Arabia has seen \u00a3197bn flood out since the mid-1970s, and Nigeria \u00a3196bn.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00bbThe problem here is that the assets of these countries are held by a small number of wealthy individuals while the debts are shouldered by the ordinary people of these countries through their governments, the report says. The sheer size of the cash pile sitting out of reach of tax authorities is so great that it suggests standard measures of inequality radically underestimate the true gap between rich and poor. According to Henry’s calculations, \u00a36.3tn of assets is owned by only 92,000 people, or 0.001% of the world’s population a tiny class of the mega-rich who have more in common with each other than those at the bottom of the income scale in their own societies.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t Parall\u00e8lement, Associated Press a publi\u00e9 une \u00e9tude sur la pauvret\u00e9 aux USA. Il s’agit du cas classique d’une progression sous la forme d’une r\u00e9gression, le niveau de la pauvret\u00e9 semblant devoir atteindre, en un gracieux mouvement de retour sur soi-m\u00eame, le rang de la pauvret\u00e9 de 1960, quasiment \u00e0 l’origine de le tenue \u00e0 jour de cet indice du taux de pauvret\u00e9 (indice mis en place en 1959). Le recensement effectu\u00e9 par AP s’arr\u00eate \u00e0 2010 et l’on attend les chiffres de 2011 pour cet automne, dans les semaines critiques avant l’\u00e9lection pr\u00e9sidentielle, ce qui suscite l’angoisse de BHO, bien entendu, dont on ne doute pas que le motif est cette situation de la pauvret\u00e9 bien plus que le moment, proche de sa r\u00e9\u00e9lection potentielle et esp\u00e9r\u00e9e, o\u00f9 l’on donnera les chiffres de 2011, qui seront, bien entendu, pires, bien pires que ceux de 2010 (Voir Newsday.com<\/em>, Associated Press, le 22 juillet 2012<\/a>.)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00abThe ranks of America’s poor are on track to climb to levels unseen in nearly half a century, erasing gains from the war on poverty in the 1960s amid a weak economy and fraying government safety net. Census figures for 2011 will be released this fall in the critical weeks ahead of the November elections.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00bbThe Associated Press surveyed more than a dozen economists, think tanks and academics, both nonpartisan and those with known liberal or conservative leanings, and found a broad consensus: The official poverty rate will rise from 15.1 percent in 2010, climbing as high as 15.7 percent. Several predicted a more modest gain, but even a 0.1 percentage point increase would put poverty at the highest level since 1965<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n