{"id":73278,"date":"2012-07-25T18:38:55","date_gmt":"2012-07-25T18:38:55","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2012\/07\/25\/pourquoi-pas-al-qaida-dans-lotan\/"},"modified":"2012-07-25T18:38:55","modified_gmt":"2012-07-25T18:38:55","slug":"pourquoi-pas-al-qaida-dans-lotan","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2012\/07\/25\/pourquoi-pas-al-qaida-dans-lotan\/","title":{"rendered":"Pourquoi pas al Qa\u00efda<\/em> dans l’OTAN ?"},"content":{"rendered":"

Pourquoi pas al Qa\u00efda<\/em> dans l’OTAN ?<\/h2>\n<\/p>\n

\t C’est vrai, les guerriers d’al Qa\u00efda semblent se confirmer comme de merveilleux ex\u00e9cutants des consignes, tr\u00e8s bien int\u00e9gr\u00e9s, adeptes du travail bien fait, en parfaite coordination, voire int\u00e9gration dans le bloc BAO, faux-nez de l’OTAN (ou l’inverse), avec en plus un portefeuille dans les grasses menottes qataries et saoudiennes Bri\u00e8vement dit, il faut savoir que la presse allemande est pleine des d\u00e9tails venant de fuites consid\u00e9rables des services de renseignement allemands (BND), de divers reportages, etc., qui exposent la responsabilit\u00e9 massive d’al Qa\u00efda dans les massacres syriens, lesquels massacres, dans notre narrative<\/em> \u00e0 nous, bloc BAO, justifient imp\u00e9rativement, imm\u00e9diatement et vertueusement, le d\u00e9part s\u00e9ance tenante du massacreur Assad.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tIl appara\u00eet que l’effet de ces r\u00e9v\u00e9lations dans la presse et de la quasi confirmation du gouvernement allemand devant le Bundestag<\/em>, ont \u00e9t\u00e9 particuli\u00e8rement et douloureusement ressenties dans la bureaucratie europ\u00e9enne, qui avait bas\u00e9 toutes ses analyses de la situation syrienne, \u00e0 partir des consignes des directions politiques et de sources fort incertaines, sur la responsabilit\u00e9 massive du gouvernement Assad et de son arm\u00e9e. (Jusqu’\u00e0 il y a un peu plus d’un mois, les analystes de la bureaucratie europ\u00e9enne n’\u00e9taient pas autoris\u00e9s, par leur hi\u00e9rarchie, \u00e0 introduire dans leurs analyses l’hypoth\u00e8se, et le fait encore moins, que les massacres pussent \u00eatre de la responsabilit\u00e9 des rebelles.)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tA ce niveau d’effet et de documentation des massacres et du r\u00f4le d’al Qa\u00efda, cet aspect de la crise syrienne devient un \u00e9l\u00e9ment politique important de plus, dans le d\u00e9sordre g\u00e9n\u00e9ral de la crise et l’aggravation extr\u00eame de la tension. Pour l’information sur cette affaire, il y a l’article en anglais de John Rosenthal, qui dirige le site Transatlantic Intelligence<\/em>. Le 23 juillet 2012<\/a>, Rosenthal donne quelques indications pr\u00e9liminaires sur son site, puis renvoie \u00e0 son article du 24 juillet 2012>D> sur Atimes.com<\/em>. <\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00abGerman intelligence estimates that around 90 terror attacks that \u00ab\u00a0can be attributed to organizations that are close to al-Qaeda or jihadist groups\u00a0\u00bb were carried out in Syria between the end of December and the beginning of July, as reported by the German daily Die Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung (FAZ). This was revealed by the German government in a response to a parliamentary question.<\/em> <\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbIn response to the same question, the German government admitted that it had received several reports from the German foreign intelligence service, the BND, on the May 25 massacre in the Syrian town of Houla. But it noted that the content of these reports was to remain classified by reason of national interest, Like many other Western governments, Germany expelled Syria’s ambassador in the immediate aftermath of the massacre, holding the Syrian government responsible for the violence.<\/em> <\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbMeanwhile, at least three major German newspapers – Die Welt, the FAZ, and the mass-market tabloid Bild – have published reports attributing responsibility for the massacre to anti-government rebel forces or treating this as the most probable scenario. Writing in Bild, longtime German war correspondent Jurgen Todenhofer accused the rebels of deliberately killing civilians and then presenting them as victims of the government. He described this massacre-marketing strategy as being among the most disgusting things that I have ever experienced in an armed conflict. Todenhofer had recently been to Damascus, where he interviewed Syrian President Bashar al-Assad for Germany’s ARD public television.<\/em> <\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbWriting in Die Welt, Alfred Hackensberger noted that Taldo, the sub-district of Houla where the massacre occurred, has been under rebel control since December 2011 and is in an open plain, making it unlikely that hundreds of soldiers and Assad supporters could have entered the village to commit the massacre. (An abridged version of Hackenberger’s report also appeared in Die Berliner Morgenpost.) Hackensberger visited Houla to conduct investigations for his report.<\/em> <\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbHe also interviewed an alleged eyewitness – identified simply by the pseudonym \u00ab\u00a0Jibril\u00a0\u00bb – at the Saint James Monastery in Qara, Syria. In contrast to an earlier report in the FAZ, which had claimed that the victims were largely Shi’ites and Alawis, Jibril told Hackensberger that all of the victims were Sunnis like everybody here\u00a0\u00bb. By his account, they were killed for refusing to support the rebellion. Jibril added that \u00ab\u00a0a lot of people in Houla know what really happened but would not say so out of fear for their lives. Whoever says something, he explained, can only repeat the rebels’ version. Anything else is certain death.<\/em> []<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbThat the German government would cite national interest in refusing to disclose its information concerning the circumstances of the Houla massacre is particularly notable in light of Germany’s support for the rebellion and its political arm, the Syrian National Council (SNC). While France, the United Kingdom, and the United States have figured as the most visible Western powers supporting the rebellion, Germany has been quietly playing a major role behind the scenes. According to a new report in the FAZ, the German foreign office is working with representatives of the Syrian opposition to develop concrete plans for a political transition in Syria following the fall of Assad.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\n

dedefensa.org<\/em><\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Pourquoi pas al Qa\u00efda dans l’OTAN ? C’est vrai, les guerriers d’al Qa\u00efda semblent se confirmer comme de merveilleux ex\u00e9cutants des consignes, tr\u00e8s bien int\u00e9gr\u00e9s, adeptes du travail bien fait, en parfaite coordination, voire int\u00e9gration dans le bloc BAO, faux-nez de l’OTAN (ou l’inverse), avec en plus un portefeuille dans les grasses menottes qataries et… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[14],"tags":[4202,2623,3079,11452,14978,3867],"class_list":["post-73278","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-ouverture-libre","tag-assad","tag-bureaucratie","tag-europeenne","tag-massacres","tag-rosenthal","tag-syrie"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/73278","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=73278"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/73278\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=73278"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=73278"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=73278"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}