{"id":73389,"date":"2012-09-15T12:39:32","date_gmt":"2012-09-15T12:39:32","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2012\/09\/15\/drole-de-drones-a-benghazi\/"},"modified":"2012-09-15T12:39:32","modified_gmt":"2012-09-15T12:39:32","slug":"drole-de-drones-a-benghazi","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2012\/09\/15\/drole-de-drones-a-benghazi\/","title":{"rendered":"Dr\u00f4le de drones<\/em> \u00e0 Benghazi"},"content":{"rendered":"

Dr\u00f4le de drones<\/em> \u00e0 Benghazi<\/h3>\n<\/p>\n

\tIl y a deux jours, on nous annon\u00e7ait que les USA, d\u00e9cid\u00e9s \u00e0 prendre les choses en main pour la bonne marche du printemps arabe, avaient envoy\u00e9 des drones<\/em> en Libye. On nous annon\u00e7ait cela, le 12 septembre 2012<\/a>, sur The Atlantic<\/em> relayant CNN. La nouvelle pr\u00e9cisait que la pr\u00e9sence de drones<\/em> US en Libye n’est pas nouvelle, on s’en doutait, certes, mais que cette pr\u00e9sence, jusqu’ici pacifique, allait se transformer en une offensive d\u00e9termin\u00e9e.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00abThe U.S. has previously flown surveillance missions over the Benghazi area in the search for terrorist camps, but has not launched any attacks using the drones, leaving that to Libya forces. However, given the failure of Libyan security at the embassy, it’s possible that U.S. military will take action, should any groups be found that can be tied to the attack.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tLes premiers r\u00e9sultats obtenus sont surprenants, et bien \u00e0 l’image de la situation du sympathique printemps arabe, et notamment de la situation en Libye, un peu moins d’un an apr\u00e8s sa lib\u00e9ration d\u00e9finitive et son entr\u00e9e officielle dans ke grand cercle vertueux de la d\u00e9mocratie. L’a\u00e9roport de Benghazi a \u00e9t\u00e9 ferm\u00e9 dans la nuit de jeudi et une grande partie de la journ\u00e9e d’hier, par crainte que des avions civils ne s’aventurent, \u00e0 se poser ou \u00e0 tenter de se poser, dans tous les cas ne s’approchent de la zone de l’a\u00e9roport. La raison en est que des batteries antia\u00e9riennes aux mains de divers groupes, milices, etc., hors des autorit\u00e9s officielles, install\u00e9es dans diverses zones autour de l’a\u00e9roport, ont ouvert le feu sur des drones<\/em> am\u00e9ricanistes. Il semble effet que des armements de ce type, particuli\u00e8rement nombreux dans les forces de Kadhafi, aient \u00e9t\u00e9 r\u00e9cup\u00e9r\u00e9s et dispers\u00e9s entre ces divers groupes d’une fa\u00e7on assez \u00e9gale, disons d\u00e9mocratiquement, ce qui mettrait ainsi les drones<\/em> US sous le feu, notamment, des groupes du domaine al Qa\u00efda. (Les batteries sol-air devraient \u00eatre des syst\u00e8mes sovi\u00e9tiques r\u00e9cup\u00e9r\u00e9s, notamment des aff\u00fbts de mitrailleuses et de canons anti-a\u00e9riens, voire peut-\u00eatre de redoutables aff\u00fbts ZSU-23 de quatre canons de 23mm. Il s’agit aussi de l’emploi en mode sol-air de mitrailleuses normales, mont\u00e9es sur des v\u00e9hicules.)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tAntiwar.com<\/em> donne, le 15 septembre 2012<\/a>, les interventions r\u00e9sum\u00e9es sur ces circonstances, qui ajoutent une touche tr\u00e8s particuli\u00e8res au d\u00e9sordre g\u00e9n\u00e9ral qui semble \u00eatre le caract\u00e8re le plus constant de la situation libyenne. L’intervention US avec des drones<\/em>, technique particuli\u00e8rement d\u00e9test\u00e9e dans tous les pays arabes, contribue donc pour l’instant, sinon \u00e0 l’\u00e9limination des groupes ayant particip\u00e9 aux \u00e9v\u00e9nements du 11 septembre \u00e0 Benghazi, dans tous les cas \u00e0 l’\u00e9tablissement d’un d\u00e9sordre \u00e0 un niveau de sophistication particuli\u00e8rement remarquable.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00abThe Benghazi Airport was closed overnight and remained closed for much of the day because of heavy anti-aircraft fire around the city by various Islamist factions targeting the US drones that have been looming overhead since the attack on the US consulate earlier this week.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbLibya’s Deputy Interior Minister said the US had authorization to use the drones over Benghazi, and initial speculation was that the airport was closed just to all the drones to operate without anything else in the air. The government’s statement was ambiguous, saying that it was done for security reasons, but Deputy Interior Minister Sharif later said the decision to close the airport was directly related to the anti-aircraft fire and the fear that they might hit civilian aircraft.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

\tMis en ligne le 15 septembre 2012 \u00e0 12H39<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Dr\u00f4le de drones \u00e0 Benghazi Il y a deux jours, on nous annon\u00e7ait que les USA, d\u00e9cid\u00e9s \u00e0 prendre les choses en main pour la bonne marche du printemps arabe, avaient envoy\u00e9 des drones en Libye. On nous annon\u00e7ait cela, le 12 septembre 2012, sur The Atlantic relayant CNN. La nouvelle pr\u00e9cisait que la pr\u00e9sence… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[15088,3936,15086,15087,11902,2867,4242],"class_list":["post-73389","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-aeroport","tag-al","tag-antiair","tag-artillerie","tag-benghazi","tag-drones","tag-qaida"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/73389","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=73389"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/73389\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=73389"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=73389"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=73389"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}