{"id":73624,"date":"2014-01-09T06:47:17","date_gmt":"2014-01-09T06:47:17","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2014\/01\/09\/we-the-people-face-a-la-nsa\/"},"modified":"2014-01-09T06:47:17","modified_gmt":"2014-01-09T06:47:17","slug":"we-the-people-face-a-la-nsa","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2014\/01\/09\/we-the-people-face-a-la-nsa\/","title":{"rendered":"We, the people<\/em> face \u00e0 la NSA"},"content":{"rendered":"

We, the people<\/em> face \u00e0 la NSA<\/h3>\n<\/p>\n

\tDans sa derni\u00e8re chronique du 8 janvier 2014<\/a>, Justin Raimondo nous propose sa formule op\u00e9rationnelle : Comment combattre la NSA, et gagner. Sa chronique prend en compte diverses r\u00e9actions de lecteurs d’articles hostiles \u00e0 la NSA, approbateurs de ces articles et terminant par la question d\u00e9sesp\u00e9r\u00e9e : \u00abYes, but what can we do about it?<\/em>\u00bb Raimondo r\u00e9pond en libertarien \u00e0 cette question, puisqu’il est effectivement de cette tendance libertarienne, \u00e9galement identifiable comme populiste (de droite), aujourd’hui tr\u00e8s active aux USA, tr\u00e8s efficace, et qui obtient effectivement des r\u00e9sultats remarquables. (Raimondo ne manque jamais de rappeler que Snowden est lui-m\u00eame un libertarien qui a vot\u00e9 pour Ron Paul, ce qui rapproche d’une fa\u00e7on inattendue le fameux whistleblower<\/em> de l’initiative de Rand Paul lanc\u00e9e contre la NSA [voir le 7 janvier 2014<\/a>].)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tRaimondo explique l’initiative de divers groupes de r\u00e9sistance proches des tendances libertariennes de Californie (OffNow.org<\/em>, Tenth Amendment Center<\/em>) qui ont r\u00e9ussi \u00e0 convaincre deux s\u00e9nateurs de l’\u00c9tat, un r\u00e9publicain et un d\u00e9mocrate, de pr\u00e9senter une l\u00e9gislation anti-NSA extr\u00eamement sophistiqu\u00e9e, la proposition de loi SB828, qui va \u00eatre propos\u00e9e au vote et qui organise des mesures de contraintes et de restriction contre la NSA dans l’\u00c9tat de Californie, notamment dans le but de contrecarrer physiquement et logistiquement le fonctionnement de l’Agence par le biais de soci\u00e9t\u00e9s impliqu\u00e9es en Californie. (Russia Today<\/em> a un article du 8 janvier 2014<\/a> sp\u00e9cifique sur la l\u00e9gislation SB828 qui vient d’\u00eatre officiellement d\u00e9pos\u00e9e devant le S\u00e9nat de Californie le 7 janvier : \u00abDisgruntled with NSA spying on US citizens, two senators from opposing parties have introduced a bill banning companies in California from providing essential utility services to the agency including cutting off its computer-cooling water supply.<\/em>\u00bb)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tRaimondo explique en d\u00e9tails la l\u00e9gislation SB828, notamment son extr\u00eame diversit\u00e9 de mesures concr\u00e8tes et, \u00e9galement, son action aupr\u00e8s d’institutions de l’\u00c9tat (notamment des universit\u00e9s) qui acceptent de collaborer avec la NSA, notamment pour le recrutement de nouveaux collaborateurs. Il s’agit, selon Raimondo, de d\u00e9l\u00e9gitimer<\/strong> la NSA, de la rendre en un certain sens hors-la-loi d’un point de vue institutionnel dans le tissu socio-\u00e9ducatif et socioprofessionnel aux USA, mais bien sur cette base essentiellement localiste (la r\u00e9f\u00e9rence libertarienne fondamentale) de l’\u00c9tat de l’Union contre le centr\u00e9 f\u00e9d\u00e9ral washingtonien (\u00ab an out-of-control federal government<\/em>\u00bb, comme dit l’un des deux s\u00e9nateurs qui pr\u00e9sentent SB828 \u00e0 la l\u00e9gislature de l’\u00c9tat). Raimondo pr\u00e9cise que ce type de l\u00e9gislation est consid\u00e9r\u00e9 par deux autres \u00c9tats, tandis qu’un autre type de l\u00e9gislation anti-NSA est lanc\u00e9 dans d’autres \u00c9tats de l’Union encore. Il y a un tissu d’organisations dissidentes, appuy\u00e9es sur des cellules juridiques extr\u00eamement sophistiqu\u00e9es, qui proposent ainsi des mod\u00e8les de l\u00e9gislation anti-NSA d’\u00c9tats en \u00c9tats de l’Union et encouragent les initiatives institutionnelles et politiques.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tRaimondo, en r\u00e9ponse \u00e0 ce mais qu’est-ce qu’on peut faire contre la NSA ? : \u00abThe answer: take action at the local level. Use as a model the efforts of California libertarian activists who have lobbied state Senators Ted Lieu (D-Torrance) and Joel Anderson (R-San Diego) to introduce the Fourth Amendment Protection Act forbidding any state support to the National Security Agency. I agree with the NSA that the world is a dangerous place, says Lieu, That is why our founders enacted the Bill of Rights. They understood the grave dangers of an out-of-control federal government.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbThe OffNow Coalition has developed model legislation, and the California bill has taken that template, crafting a bill SB 828 that would prohibit the state or any of its subdivisions from providing material support, participation or assistance in any form to a federal agency that claims the power, by virtue of any federal law, rule, regulation or order, to collect electronic data or metadata of any person pursuant to any action not based on a warrant that particularly describes the person, place and thing to be searched or seized.<\/em> […]<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbAnd it’s not just California: Arizona is considering a similar bill. Missouri and Kansas have bills in the hopper that would put restrictions on the admissibility in court of evidence obtained by NSA spies. Mike Maharrey, communications director of the Tenth Amendment Center which is coordinating the campaign nationwide says at least four other states will take up similar legislation in the first months of 2014… Can we up that number to fourteen or twenty-four? Sure we can!…<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbOur strategy, then, must be similar to the old Maoist concept of people’s war: occupy the countryside and surround the cities, drawing in the enemy and draining their resources until we can mobilize enough support to move in on the rotten urban core. I wrote about this localist strategy here, back in the summer, but hadn’t realized until now that some people were acting on it (not that I originated the idea, or that anyone was acting at my direction).<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbA broad popular movement is building in the country that sees overweening government as the greatest threat to our liberty, our prosperity, and our happiness, and it’s not just a libertarian thing. As Tenth Amendment Center activist Maharrey puts it: This crosses party lines. Left, right and even the generally apathetic are outraged that their government is spying on them day in and day out, he said. Violations of our basic civil liberties impacts us all Democrats, Republicans and independents alike. For all of our political bickering, Americans rally around certain core principles enshrined in our Constitution. It’s fitting that Lieu and Anderson are standing together to defend these values.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbCampus activists have a special role to play: because the battle against the NSA is all about delegitimizing it, efforts to delink the agency from \u00ab\u00a0respectable\u00a0\u00bb academic institutions are key. Students will naturally be in the forefront of this fight, and luckily we have a strong libertarian student movement in Young Americans for Liberty (YAL), with over 500 active college and high school chapters, and Students for Liberty (SFL), an educational group with affiliates all over the world. So please, commenters, don’t ask me \u00ab\u00a0what can I do?\u00a0\u00bb You can go here, download the model legislation, take it to your local state representatives, and don’t stop until you get one of them to introduce a bill restricting NSA activities in your state and\/or locality. Then start campaigning for it like your life depends on it because it does.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t A c\u00f4t\u00e9 de cette initiative majeure qui, aux USA, s’appuie sur la tendance centrifuge fondamentale du pays d’hostilit\u00e9 au gouvernement central dans le sens implicite mais puissant d’une d\u00e9volution, d’autres suggestions d’actions apparaissent comme celle que propose l’auteur et futurologue britannique Harry J. Bentham (dans PressTV.ir<\/em>, le 7 janvier 2014<\/a>). Comme celle que signale Raimondo, elle a la particularit\u00e9 de s’exercer dans un domaine diff\u00e9rent de l’activit\u00e9 technique et \u00e9lectronique pure de la NSA, c’est-\u00e0-dire qu’elle doit \u00eatre vue \u00e9galement comme un compl\u00e9ment des ripostes <\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tdirectes et \u00e9galement techniques de certaines autorit\u00e9s gouvernementales et de la communaut\u00e9s des hackers<\/em> et autonomes du r\u00e9seau. La technique que propose Bentham est de saturer la NSA par des activit\u00e9s \u00e9lectroniques de communication faussaires (messages-bidon, informations fabriqu\u00e9es, etc.) pour introduire dans l’\u00e9valuation de l’Agence le chaos et la confusion. Il s’agit, si l’on veut, de tenter d’opposer la quantit\u00e9 confuse et chaotique \u00e0 la recherche de la perfection quantitative organis\u00e9e de la NSA, pour la noyer, c’est-\u00e0-dire la fausser et la gripper. On observera que cette seule proposition de Bentham, dont on sait ni l’effet concret, ni l’\u00e9cho chez ses lecteurs, a le potentiel d’introduire un doute syst\u00e9matique<\/strong> dans l’esprit d\u00e9j\u00e0 accabl\u00e9 de pr\u00e9occupations pesantes pour leur psychologie des \u00e9valuateurs et experts de la NSA ; c’est la voie vers le chaos et la confusion, version vertueusement invertie de la voie vers la sagesse…<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00abIn most discussions, encryption and lawmaking are seen as the only two defenses against US global surveillance. Neither appears to be sufficient to utterly abolish the criminal spying practices of the US. The United States covertly violates its own laws and bypasses the remaining barriers with its technological superiority. The failure of the United States’ criminal activities depends on the world forcing them to surrender their practices by making them too costly to sustain.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbAn advantage in encryption will never be complete while the US retains its technological abilities. In the meantime, information can be laid out in such a way that it simply is not useful to prying eyes, or laid out to cause false alarms and waste funds. All those who have been targeted by the US surveillance regime are able to fight back, by actively deceiving the NSA. Only a relentless campaign of confusion and traps such as this could render US email interception so costly and unreliable that it would finally be scrapped.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbInterception of the world’s email is pointless unless specific data can be obtained reliably through it. If enough noise and falsehoods are fed in, such spying is useless. Governments resisting the global spies could easily plague them by dedicating periods of time to misleading the United States, pressuring the arrogant regime to make mistakes and waste funds due to intercepting and wading through vast numbers of fraudulent emails.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbBecause we all live in a regime of total surveillance, any campaign of confusion and chaos directed against US communication interception deserves global attention. A culture that encourages the direction of confusion and chaos against the United States authorities is imperative. The rights of nations and individuals must be preserved by any means, lest they succumb to the global tyranny. A campaign of confusion could be a form of global civil disobedience against the US, a form of non-cooperation designed to throw off the US yoke. Such a move would be capable of eliminating the regime’s belief that is has either knowledge or power.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbAs their knowledge is replaced with confusion and doubt, their power can be replaced with weakness and indecision. Thus, to render the surveillance regime incapable, communication that had been intercepted by the US can simply be replaced with false communication occasionally…<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tOn remarquera que toutes ces initiatives rel\u00e8vent d’une sorte de populisme (le We, the people<\/em> de la Constitution US), mais un populisme postmoderne et non pas l’\u00e9pouvantail classique r\u00e9guli\u00e8rement ressorti de la naphtaline cat\u00e9gorie-le fascisme ne passera pas par les salons parisiens chaque fois que la R\u00e9publique est en danger, danger type-Dieudonn\u00e9, cela va sans dire. Bref, nous sommes dans le s\u00e9rieux des affaires de r\u00e9sistance (quoique le danger type-Dieudonn\u00e9 le soit \u00e9galement, non pas \u00e0 cause de la naphtaline mais gr\u00e2ce au degr\u00e9 d’hyst\u00e9rie o\u00f9 il plonge le Syst\u00e8me). L’int\u00e9r\u00eat de cette riposte type-populiste est bien entendu de d\u00e9placer la forme de la r\u00e9sistance hors du terrain naturel \u00e0 la NSA. C’est une circonstance qu’on devrait absolument classer dans le domaine de la G4G (Guerre de 4\u00e8me G\u00e9n\u00e9ration<\/a>), ou guerre asym\u00e9trique qui porte alors, dans cette occurrence, parfaitement son nom. (L’on dirait alors, plus justement, r\u00e9sistance asym\u00e9trique.)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tIl s’agit de d\u00e9placer les conditions et le th\u00e9\u00e2tre de l’affrontement, de dicter de nouvelles conditions de combat. Cela implique \u00e9videmment d’\u00e9carter le dialogue (avec la NSA), m\u00eame critique et antagoniste, qui se trouve sur son terrain, th\u00e8me de la s\u00e9curit\u00e9 nationale avec les narrative<\/em> diverses qui le meublent. L’argument devient : il faut tout faire<\/strong> pour entraver l’action de la NSA par tous les moyens, y compris et surtout<\/strong> les plus d\u00e9loyaux du point de vue de l’Agence, les plus n\u00e9gatifs, voire les plus nihilistes du point de vue de sa logique \u00e0 elle. Il s’agit de faire resurgir \u00e0 cette occasion des probl\u00e8mes plus fondamentaux tel celui des rapports entre les \u00c9tats de l’Union et le centre, comme dans le cas Raimondo-SB828 ; celui des formes d’action in\u00e9dite \u00e0 trouver pour la r\u00e9sistance antiSyst\u00e8me en g\u00e9n\u00e9ral, etc. D’une fa\u00e7on g\u00e9n\u00e9rale, \u00e0 c\u00f4t\u00e9 de la bataille classique qui se poursuit autour de la crise Snowden\/NSA, il faut d\u00e9velopper une dimension nouvelle de cette crise, la dimension de la r\u00e9sistance-populiste, qui d\u00e9place le cas vers la probl\u00e9matique g\u00e9n\u00e9rale de la r\u00e9sistance contre le Syst\u00e8me, en recourant \u00e0 diverses techniques imm\u00e9moriales, dont celle de faire a\u00efkido<\/em> (voir le 2 juillet 2012<\/a>). <\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tD’une fa\u00e7on encore plus g\u00e9n\u00e9rale qui concerne la situation g\u00e9n\u00e9rale de la civilisation, il ne s’agit pas de savoir si l’on a une chance de battre le Syst\u00e8me, de savoir par quoi on le remplacera si on le bat, bref de sp\u00e9culer pour l’action \u00e0 entreprendre sans agir ; il s’agit d’agir purement et simplement avec tous les moyens disponibles, et en g\u00e9n\u00e9ral avec l’aide de l’imagination cr\u00e9atrice qui est cette monstruosit\u00e9 humaine dont l’entit\u00e9 NSA a \u00e9videmment horreur, pour frapper, frapper et encore frapper. Il faut donc profiter de l’occasion qui est offerte. Par cette remarque, nous voulons dire que l’occasion offerte c’est de prendre en compte ce fait qu’outre d’avoir r\u00e9v\u00e9l\u00e9 l’\u00e9tendue du monstre et d’avoir ainsi r\u00e9duit drastiquement son efficacit\u00e9 par cette exposition \u00e0 la lumi\u00e8re, la nouveaut\u00e9 essentielle de la crise Snowden\/NSA est sans aucun doute de nous avoir officiellement fourni un clou (une vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9) d’une \u00e9norme dimension sur lequel frapper et encore frapper pour l’enfoncer fort douloureusement dans le flanc du Syst\u00e8me, et que \u00e7a saigne, please<\/em> !, car le Syst\u00e8me, cette \u00e9gr\u00e9gore habill\u00e9e en fringues du scientisme et du moralisme postmodernes, saigne comme vous et moi lorsqu’on l’agresse…<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

\tMis en ligne le 18 janvier 2014 \u00e0 06H58<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

We, the people face \u00e0 la NSA Dans sa derni\u00e8re chronique du 8 janvier 2014, Justin Raimondo nous propose sa formule op\u00e9rationnelle : Comment combattre la NSA, et gagner. Sa chronique prend en compte diverses r\u00e9actions de lecteurs d’articles hostiles \u00e0 la NSA, approbateurs de ces articles et terminant par la question d\u00e9sesp\u00e9r\u00e9e : \u00abYes,… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[12375,3745,15520,2942,2631,4889,7865,5701,2645,4419,6985,3871,15519,5303,4337,2755,15518,12224],"class_list":["post-73624","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-aikido","tag-asymetrique","tag-bentham","tag-californie","tag-de","tag-etats","tag-faire","tag-g4g","tag-guerre","tag-lunion","tag-libertarien","tag-nsa","tag-offnow","tag-populisme","tag-raimondo","tag-resistance","tag-sb828","tag-snowden"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/73624","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=73624"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/73624\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=73624"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=73624"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=73624"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}