{"id":73686,"date":"2014-02-06T14:43:23","date_gmt":"2014-02-06T14:43:23","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2014\/02\/06\/liran-ca-swingue-menaces-us-de-sanctions-anti-francaises\/"},"modified":"2014-02-06T14:43:23","modified_gmt":"2014-02-06T14:43:23","slug":"liran-ca-swingue-menaces-us-de-sanctions-anti-francaises","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2014\/02\/06\/liran-ca-swingue-menaces-us-de-sanctions-anti-francaises\/","title":{"rendered":"L’Iran, \u00e7a swingue : menaces US de sanctions anti-fran\u00e7aises…"},"content":{"rendered":"

L’Iran, \u00e7a swingue : menaces US de sanctions anti-fran\u00e7aises…<\/h4>\n

Les lacets, les tournant en U et les t\u00eate-\u00e0-queue de la politique ext\u00e9rieure du bloc BAO, notamment vis-\u00e0-vis de l’Iran pour le cas qui nous occupe, sont pleins de surprises r\u00e9jouissantes. Depuis qu’une d\u00e9l\u00e9gation de repr\u00e9sentants d’une centaine de soci\u00e9t\u00e9s fran\u00e7aises est en Iran (le 3 f\u00e9vrier) pour \u00e9tablir de nouveaux liens du type business is business<\/em>, le d\u00e9partement d’\u00c9tat s’est retrouv\u00e9 une verve anti-fran\u00e7aise, comme du temps de l’Irak et du French-bashing<\/em>, histoire de bien pr\u00e9parer la solennelle visite du pr\u00e9sident-poire accompagn\u00e9 par le pr\u00e9sident-qui-marche-sur-l’eau chez leur copain commun Thomas Jefferson<\/a>, lundi prochain. Il y a des avertissements formels de possibles sanctions US contre la France<\/strong> si le processus se poursuit, venant aussi bien de la sous-secr\u00e9taire d’\u00c9tat pour les affaires politiques Wendy Sherman, que du secr\u00e9taire d’\u00c9tat Kerry. (Sherman devant le Congr\u00e8s le 4 f\u00e9vrier : \u00abSecretary Kerry has talked directly to Foreign Minister Fabius about the trade delegation… about how this is not helpful. Tehran is not open for business because our sanctions relief is quite temporary, quite limited and quite targeted…<\/em>\u00bb)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tSur Antiwars.com<\/em>, le 6 f\u00e9vrier 2014<\/a>, daube sur les USA mena\u00e7ant le pays le plus neocon<\/em> ces derniers mois face \u00e0 l’Iran, pour compromission avec l’Iran, et la difficult\u00e9 de l’exercice additionnant virages en U et t\u00eate-\u00e0-queue tout en maintenant haute la dignit\u00e9 de la politique ext\u00e9rieure US… \u00abIronically France was the last holdout on the P5+1 deal, citing Israeli opposition to any deal with Iran as their reason. It may be difficult for the Kerry to follow through with real sanctions on France, and companies may be willing to call America’s bluff.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tFaut-il prendre au s\u00e9rieux ces entrelacs de type-auto-tamponneuse de la politique du bloc BAO interpr\u00e9t\u00e9e par les divers solistes du bloc, dans le cadre de l’accord P5+1 additionn\u00e9 des bonnes intentions et des interpr\u00e9tations des uns et des autres ? Vaillamment, le professeur de l’universit\u00e9 de T\u00e9h\u00e9ran et analyste politique Seyed Mohamed Marandi s’y essaie, dans une interview \u00e0 Russia Today<\/em> le 6 f\u00e9vrier 2014<\/a>. Il examine donc les probabilit\u00e9s d’isolement des USA dans leur phase actuelle, dans leur radicalisme contre les Fran\u00e7ais, tout comme les Fran\u00e7ais se mirent en posture d’isolement eux-m\u00eames, dans l’une des phase presque-ultime de l’accord P5+1 (phase du 9 novembre 2013, rappel\u00e9e le 16 novembre 2013<\/a>). A la question de RT (\u00abWill Washington’s warning have any effect on businesses seeking to explore Iran’s economy?<\/em>\u00bb), le professeur Marandi r\u00e9plique, illustrant implicitement le volet habituel du d\u00e9sordre ma\u00eetre du jeu, o\u00f9 les \u00e9v\u00e9nements dictent aux uns et aux autres la politique qu’ils finiront par embrasser, pour ne pas \u00eatre \u00e9touff\u00e9e par elle :<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00abI think the Americans will have great difficulty because there are delegations coming from across the globe. Just recently we’ve had senior delegations, both political and otherwise from China, and from other countries in Asia, Europe, Latin America all of them want to be more involved with Iran. I think this is something that actually overwhelms the US.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbThe Americans are playing it unrealistically. If the Americans behaved more rationally they would be able to move themselves towards rapprochement with Iran – perhaps get a piece of the cake. But also by behaving in such an irrational manner towards Iran, by threatening countries from doing business with Iran, in the long run they hurt themselves more than anyone else.<\/em> <\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbAs I said the sanction regime is already breaking down. It is becoming more difficult for the Americans to enforce. The balance of power is already shifting away from the US and Europe naturally; Asia is becoming more powerful. So in the long term the Americans know they cannot hold back Iran. And the only realistic way is for the US to become more reasonable and rational towards the country.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

\tMis en ligne le 6 f\u00e9vrier 2014 \u00e0 14H29<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

L’Iran, \u00e7a swingue : menaces US de sanctions anti-fran\u00e7aises… Les lacets, les tournant en U et les t\u00eate-\u00e0-queue de la politique ext\u00e9rieure du bloc BAO, notamment vis-\u00e0-vis de l’Iran pour le cas qui nous occupe, sont pleins de surprises r\u00e9jouissantes. Depuis qu’une d\u00e9l\u00e9gation de repr\u00e9sentants d’une centaine de soci\u00e9t\u00e9s fran\u00e7aises est en Iran (le 3… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[21],"tags":[3567,2687,3203,2773,855,12443,7522,5646,4253],"class_list":["post-73686","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-breves-de-crise","tag-business","tag-france","tag-hollande","tag-iran","tag-kerry","tag-marandi","tag-p51","tag-sanctions","tag-sherman"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/73686","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=73686"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/73686\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=73686"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=73686"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=73686"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}