Die Welt<\/em> et introduit les \u00e9l\u00e9ments de sa propre enqu\u00eate qui permettent d’\u00e9clairer d\u00e9cisivement l’affaire selon son point de vue.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00abGovernment spokesman Jens Alberts told Claudia Himmelreich, a McClatchy special correspondent, exactly what the government said on Monday: no comment on the contents of the chancellor’s confidential phone conversations with either Putin or Obama. In defining the German view, Alberts said he would not dwell on reports and rumors of someone claiming she possibly said this or that. However, what is undisputed is that President Putin has a completely different view of the situation and the events on Crimea than the German government and our western allies. A different view. Obviously. But unhinged?<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n\tMcClatchy conclut en d\u00e9crivant le modus operandi<\/em> de cette op\u00e9ration et en tirant les conclusions qui importent. McClatchy a choisi, selon le bon sens et l’\u00e9vidence, l’explication d’une manuvre d’intoxication par m\u00e9sinformation de la part des officiels de l’\u00e9quipe Obama.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00abSo if Merkel didn’t portray Putin as unhinged, why would the unknown Obama aide tell the New York Times she did? Because in the world of propaganda, successfully portraying your adversary as being crazy, without any rational backing to his actions, makes it unnecessary to try to understand the complexities or sensitivities of the issues. If Putin is crazy, then that’s enough. We needn’t think any further about what he has to say. And if the New York Times says he’s crazy, that’s good enough for the dozens of reporters who’ve come along since, repeating the comment to their millions of viewers and readers as if it was a confirmed statement.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00bbGood work.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00bbBut there’s ample reason to suspect that Merkel’s assessment was more in keeping with her government’s portrayal of it he’s got a different view than the unnamed aide’s portrayal he’s nuts. For one, Merkel reportedly has a very close relationship with Putin they chat back and forth in German, which Putin apparently learned for his KGB cover as an interpreter when he was stationed in East Germany. It seems unlikely she’d offer so dismissive an assessment of someone she’s worked closely with. For another, Obama spent 90 minutes on the phone with Putin on Saturday. If Putin was unhinged, Obama wouldn’t have needed Merkel to tell him so.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00bbIt’s been clear for a long time that Putin’s world view is different from Obama’s or Merkel’s on many things. He laments the collapse of the Soviet Union, just like those who wish the confederacy had survived or that the sun still never set on the British Empire. Syria, too where we talk of the fight for democracy and Putin talks of terrorism. As events have unfolded, that doesn’t mean he’s crazy.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
\tMis en ligne le 7 mars 2014 \u00e0 11H48<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Enqu\u00eate sur la folie de Poutine A partir d’une communication t\u00e9l\u00e9phonique de Merkel avec Obama, il avait \u00e9t\u00e9 rapport\u00e9, selon le New York Times du 2 mars 2014, que Poutine montrait manifestement des signes d’instabilit\u00e9, voire de folie schizophr\u00e9nique puisqu’il aurait sembl\u00e9 faire partie d’un autre monde que le n\u00f4tre (celui du bloc BAO et… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[21],"tags":[10372,2748,11461,4020,7556,4633,14856,4896,3256,4014,916,2852,3257],"class_list":["post-73754","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-breves-de-crise","tag-alabama","tag-allemagne","tag-debka","tag-folie","tag-mcclatchy","tag-merkel","tag-mesinformation","tag-moon","tag-new","tag-of","tag-poutine","tag-times","tag-york"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/73754","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=73754"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/73754\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=73754"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=73754"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=73754"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}