{"id":73877,"date":"2014-05-15T05:47:10","date_gmt":"2014-05-15T05:47:10","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2014\/05\/15\/kissinger-poutine-et-lukraine\/"},"modified":"2014-05-15T05:47:10","modified_gmt":"2014-05-15T05:47:10","slug":"kissinger-poutine-et-lukraine","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2014\/05\/15\/kissinger-poutine-et-lukraine\/","title":{"rendered":"Kissinger, Poutine et l&rsquo;Ukraine"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><h4 class=\"breve-de-crise\">Kissinger, Poutine et l&rsquo;Ukraine<\/h4>\n<p>Le v\u00e9n\u00e9rable Henry Kissinger, que d&rsquo;aucuns d\u00e9signeraient \u00e0 cause de ses actes pass\u00e9s comme une v\u00e9n\u00e9rable crapule, est \u00e9galement homme d&rsquo;exp\u00e9rience \u00e0 qui il arrive encore de prendre la plume pour \u00e9mettre quelque avis sur l&rsquo;\u00e9tat des affaires courantes. Il l&rsquo;avait fait en mars, dans le Washington <em>Post<\/em>, pour juger de la situation de la crise ukrainienne, et son propos se r\u00e9sumant \u00e0 ce jugement qu&rsquo;on retint en g\u00e9n\u00e9ral, et qui s&rsquo;exprimerait ainsi : D\u00e9moniser Poutine n&rsquo;est pas une politique, c&rsquo;est plut\u00f4t le signe de l&rsquo;absence d&rsquo;une politique. C&rsquo;\u00e9tait d\u00e9j\u00e0 laisser entendre que, malgr\u00e9 la prudence qu&rsquo;il a toujours montr\u00e9e de ne pas trop s&rsquo;opposer \u00e0 la politique en cours (<em>dito<\/em>, la politique-Syst\u00e8me suivie aveugl\u00e9ment), il avait quelques nuances bien d\u00e9favorables \u00e0 apporter sur ce cas ukrainien.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tLors de l&rsquo;\u00e9mission de Fareed Zakarias (Fareed Zakarias GPS), sur CNN, le 10 mai, il est all\u00e9 un peu plus loin dans un passage de la conversation qu&rsquo;il a eue avec son h\u00f4te, membre \u00e9minent de l&rsquo;<em>establishment<\/em> (Zakarias, membre du CFR, est un globaliste impeccablement align\u00e9 sur le Syst\u00e8me). Dans ce passage, relev\u00e9 le m\u00eame <a href=\"http:\/\/globalpublicsquare.blogs.cnn.com\/2014\/05\/10\/kissinger-putin-likely-didnt-plan-to-bring-ukraine-situation-to-a-head\/\" class=\"gen\">10 mai 2014<\/a> par <em>Global Public Square<\/em>, Kissinger affirme nettement, avec les prudences de langage d&rsquo;usage, que Poutine n&rsquo;est en rien responsable de la crise ukrainienne, qu&rsquo;il ne l&rsquo;a certainement pas suscit\u00e9e, qu&rsquo;il n&rsquo;a fait que r\u00e9agir aux \u00e9v\u00e9nements de cette crise d&rsquo;une fa\u00e7on cons\u00e9quente avec sa position de dirigeant de la grande puissance qu&rsquo;est la Russie. Cela revient indirectement \u00e0 d\u00e9signer les vrais coupables de la crise, dans une autre direction qu&rsquo;\u00e0 l&rsquo;Est mais plut\u00f4t \u00e0 l&rsquo;Ouest de l&rsquo;Ukraine, vers notre cher bloc BAO. Pas de surprise certes, mais il est toujours int\u00e9ressant qu&rsquo;un Kissinger-vieille crapule exprime effectivement ce jugement.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t<strong><em>Henry Kissinger<\/em><\/strong> : \u00ab<em>One has to ask oneself this question: He<\/em> [Poutine] <em>spent $60 billion on the Olympics. They had opening and closing ceremonies, trying to show Russia as a normal progressive state. So it isn&rsquo;t possible that he, three days later, would voluntarily start an assault on Ukraine. There is no doubt that<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t<strong><em>Fareed Zakaria<\/em><\/strong> : \u00ab<em>So to explain. You&rsquo;re saying you don&rsquo;t think this was a plan.  You think he reacted to events that he saw as spiraling out of his control?<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t<strong><em>Henry Kissinger<\/em><\/strong> : \u00ab<em>Yes. I think at all times he wanted Ukraine in a subordinate position. And at all times, every senior Russian that I&rsquo;ve ever met, including dissidents like Solzhenitsyn and Brodsky, looked at Ukraine as part of the Russian heritage. But I don&rsquo;t think he had planned to bring it to a head now. I think he had planned a more gradual situation, and this is sort of a response to what he conceived to be an emergency situation. Of course, to explain why he did it doesn&rsquo;t mean one approves of annexing part of another country or crossing of borders. But I think we ought to settle the Ukraine issue first, and then have a discussion about relations with Russia.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p><p>\tMis en ligne le 15 mai 2014 \u00e0 05H41<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Kissinger, Poutine et l&rsquo;Ukraine Le v\u00e9n\u00e9rable Henry Kissinger, que d&rsquo;aucuns d\u00e9signeraient \u00e0 cause de ses actes pass\u00e9s comme une v\u00e9n\u00e9rable crapule, est \u00e9galement homme d&rsquo;exp\u00e9rience \u00e0 qui il arrive encore de prendre la plume pour \u00e9mettre quelque avis sur l&rsquo;\u00e9tat des affaires courantes. Il l&rsquo;avait fait en mars, dans le Washington Post, pour juger de&hellip;&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[21],"tags":[3642,3736,916,5456,1296,15809],"class_list":["post-73877","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-breves-de-crise","tag-cnn","tag-kissinger","tag-poutine","tag-sotchi","tag-ukraine","tag-zakarias"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/73877","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=73877"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/73877\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=73877"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=73877"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=73877"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}