{"id":73902,"date":"2011-07-15T19:03:12","date_gmt":"2011-07-15T19:03:12","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2011\/07\/15\/la-cotation-aaa-et-le-complot-de-wall-street\/"},"modified":"2011-07-15T19:03:12","modified_gmt":"2011-07-15T19:03:12","slug":"la-cotation-aaa-et-le-complot-de-wall-street","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2011\/07\/15\/la-cotation-aaa-et-le-complot-de-wall-street\/","title":{"rendered":"La cotation AAA et le complot de Wall Street"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><h4>La cotation AAA et le complot de Wall Street<\/h4>\n<p>Le site <em>MediaMatters.org<\/em> (de gauche US) cite avec une certaine ironie et un r\u00e9el scepticisme l&rsquo;humoriste de l&rsquo;id\u00e9ologie extr\u00e9miste r\u00e9publicaine Rush Limbaugh, exposant que la menace de r\u00e9trogradation de la cotation AAA pour les USA, par la soci\u00e9t\u00e9 de cotation Moody&rsquo;s (puis S&#038;P, depuis) est un complot d\u00e9mocrate pour forcer le Congr\u00e8s (les r\u00e9publicains) \u00e0 c\u00e9der face au pr\u00e9sident Obama sur la question de la dette. Les agences de cotation lient effectivement cette menace au succ\u00e8s des n\u00e9gociations entre le pr\u00e9sident et le Congr\u00e8s, alors que le pr\u00e9sident vient de lancer un <a href=\"http:\/\/www.dedefensa.org\/article-la_dette_et_le_gop_et_bho_qui_sort_de_ses_gonds_14_07_2011.html\" class=\"gen\">ultimatum<\/a> aux r\u00e9publicains.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t<em>MediaMatters.org<\/em> \u00e9crit, le <a href=\"http:\/\/mediamatters.org\/blog\/201107140028\" class=\"gen\">14 juillet 2011<\/a> :<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00ab<em>On his radio show today, Rush Limbaugh expounded a theory that Moody&rsquo;s Investors Service is beholden to Democrat Party interests due to the Dodd-Frank financial regulatory bill, suggesting that its warning of a downgrade in the U.S. credit rating if the debt ceiling is not raised by August 2 is a result of Moody&rsquo;s knowing which side of the bread their butter is on. Limbaugh offered no specific evidence to back up his theory:<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>LIMBAUGH: By the way, lest we forget on this Moody&rsquo;s business. Congress tightened its regulation of credit ratings companies last year with the so-called Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform Consumer Protection Act. Yes, that Wall Street  that financial regulatory reform bill included in it regulation of credit rating companies like Moody&rsquo;s. So these companies, like Moody&rsquo;s, know which side of the bread their butter is on. They realize that they now have to toe the line and advance the interests of the Democrat Party. Bill Hemmer today on Fox asked Stuart Varney, look, Stuart, are these guys totally objective? Stuart Varney said, they say they are. They say they are and we have to take them at their word.<\/em> <\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>It was clear to me that to Stuart Varney, Moody&rsquo;s is the gold standard, they&rsquo;re God. They&rsquo;re the absolute truth, they don&rsquo;t lie, they don&rsquo;t make it up. But all I know is that they are now regulated under the Financial Regulatory Reform Act, and that tells me they know what they have to do to stay safe, and that&rsquo;s advance the interest of the Democrat Party. But still, let&rsquo;s think about it: Obama is elected president, a mere two and half years later Moody&rsquo;s is talking about possibility of the United States defaulting on our debt. Aside from the fact that it&rsquo;s really a coincidence, does anybody really &#8212; I mean, how in the world does anybody even talk about this guy seriously getting re-elected? [Premiere Radio Networks, The Rush Limbaugh Show, 7\/14\/11]<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tMais il semble que cela (la th\u00e8se du complot, l&rsquo;appr\u00e9ciation du r\u00f4le des d\u00e9mocrates, de Wall Street, etc.) ne soit pas une fantaisie du seul Limbaugh, connu pour ses fantaisies. L&rsquo;id\u00e9e est \u00e9galement d\u00e9velopp\u00e9e par Justin Raimondo, dans sa chronique d&rsquo;<em>Antiwar.com<\/em>, ce m\u00eame <a href=\"http:\/\/original.antiwar.com\/justin\/2011\/07\/14\/the-banksters-and-american-foreign-policy\/\" class=\"gen\">14 juillet 2011<\/a>, cette fois pour avancer l&rsquo;id\u00e9e que Wall Street vient ainsi au secours de la politique \u00e9trang\u00e8re belliciste (d\u00e9mocrate) d&rsquo;Obama et de la position \u00e0 pr\u00e9tention h\u00e9g\u00e9monique des USA, qui seraient menac\u00e9es par un affrontement et un blocage au sommet du pouvoir sur la question de la dette,  politique ext\u00e9rieure et position h\u00e9g\u00e9monique o\u00f9 Wall Street a beaucoup d&rsquo;int\u00e9r\u00eats. Ainsi, l&rsquo;intervention des agences de cotation, pour faire pression sur les protagonistes des n\u00e9gociations, risque-t-elle, au contraire, d&rsquo;accro\u00eetre le foss\u00e9 en alimentant l&rsquo;id\u00e9e d&rsquo;une d\u00e9marche suscit\u00e9e par Wall Street (complot), contre le parti r\u00e9publicain.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00ab<em>The problem is dramatically illustrated by our current debate over the debt ceiling crisis. In order to reassure themselves  and, more importantly, the public  that they aren&rsquo;t just madmen, Congress imposed on itself a debt ceiling beyond which they are not supposed to go. In reality, however, they have raised the ceiling whenever they&rsquo;ve felt like it. Now, however, as the imminence of America&rsquo;s bankruptcy has impressed itself on increasing numbers of voters, there is some resistance to raising it  and, as a result, there is panic in Washington. Are the peons objecting to Washington&rsquo;s assumption of absolute power, and actually challenging the elite&rsquo;s ability to spend without limit? Horrors!<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>For months, the pundits and Washington think-tank know-it-alls have been in a tizzy: who do these unwashed peasants think they are? But of course we&rsquo;ve got to raise the debt ceiling  after all, what about the full faith and cr\u00e9dit of the United States? Don&rsquo;t these denizens of flyover country realize they don&rsquo;t have a choice in the matter? And now, with unmistakable finality, Wall Street has spoken in the form of Moody&rsquo;s and S&#038;P, the bonds rating agencies, which are threatening to downgrade US bonds if Congress fails to raise the limit.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>This should give the ordinary American a clue as to what is at stake here, and who is on what side: it&rsquo;s the Washington insiders and Wall Street versus the people of the United States  and the stakes are the fate of the nation.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t&#8230;Une autre cons\u00e9quence de cette suspicion nouvelle, cons\u00e9quence assez ironique, serait d&rsquo;acc\u00e9l\u00e9rer, cette fois \u00e0 partir des USA eux-m\u00eames, la contestation d\u00e9j\u00e0 tr\u00e8s forte en Chine et en Europe de la position de juges supr\u00eames des situations \u00e9conomiques des agences US de cotation. La contestation aux USA m\u00eame des agences de cotation US, consid\u00e9r\u00e9es comme une arme \u00e9conomique US, rend compte de l&rsquo;intensit\u00e9 de la crise du pouvoir.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>\n<p class=\"signature\"><em>dedefensa.org<\/em><\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>La cotation AAA et le complot de Wall Street Le site MediaMatters.org (de gauche US) cite avec une certaine ironie et un r\u00e9el scepticisme l&rsquo;humoriste de l&rsquo;id\u00e9ologie extr\u00e9miste r\u00e9publicaine Rush Limbaugh, exposant que la menace de r\u00e9trogradation de la cotation AAA pour les USA, par la soci\u00e9t\u00e9 de cotation Moody&rsquo;s (puis S&#038;P, depuis) est un&hellip;&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[14],"tags":[3845,4926,5252,7856,3710,11166,11047,11299,5310,11298,3372,3132],"class_list":["post-73902","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-ouverture-libre","tag-article","tag-complot","tag-dette","tag-justin","tag-limbaugh","tag-moodys","tag-poor","tag-raimondi","tag-republicains","tag-standards","tag-street","tag-wall"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/73902","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=73902"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/73902\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=73902"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=73902"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=73902"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}