Un \u00e9pisode bref mais significatif, conduit par le site Truthout.org<\/em>, nous rappelle les fondements d’une des forces essentielles de l’am\u00e9ricanisme, qui est le syst\u00e8me du technologisme<\/a> et le prolongement de l’id\u00e9al de puissance<\/a>, ainsi que la similitude m\u00e9tahistorique des courants pangermaniste et panam\u00e9ricaniste. Cet \u00e9pisode concerne l’USAF, un des fondements, l\u00e0 aussi, de la puissance technologique des USA (syst\u00e8me du technologisme) et du complexe militaro-industriel, lesquels sont \u00e0 leur tour un domaine essentiel de l’am\u00e9ricanisme qui est l’expression essentielle de l’Am\u00e9rique et de l’American Dream<\/em>. Tout cela n’est pas Tea Party<\/em>, que le monde conformiste du Syst\u00e8me d\u00e9nonce comme une sorte de r\u00e9surgence du fascisme et du nazisme, ou du bolch\u00e9visme, comme on nous l’indique curieusement ici et l\u00e0, mais tout cela laisse bien loin derri\u00e8re la grossi\u00e8re repr\u00e9sentation (Tea Party<\/em> menace le monde) \u00e0 laquelle nous assistons aujourd’hui.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n \tDans le chef des r\u00e9v\u00e9lations de Truthout.org<\/em>, il s’agit d’un cas symbolique qui t\u00e9moigne de la puissance extraordinaire de certaines racines, r\u00e9v\u00e9l\u00e9 le 27 juillet 2011<\/a> par Truthout.org<\/em>. (Dans les citations de Von Braun, les passages soulign\u00e9s de gras le sont dans le texte original de la pr\u00e9sentation.)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00abThe United States Air Force has been training young missile officers about the morals and ethics of launching nuclear weapons by citing passages from the New Testament and commentary from a former member of the Nazi Party, according to newly released documents. The mandatory Nuclear Ethics and Nuclear Warfare session, which includes a discussion on St. Augustine’s Christian Just War Theory, is led by Air Force chaplains and takes place during a missile officer’s first week in training at Vandenberg Air Force Base in California. St. Augustine’s Qualifications for Just War, according to the way it is cited in a 43-page PowerPoint presentation, are: to avenge or to avert evil; to protect the innocent and restore moral social order (just cause) and to restore moral order; not expand power, not for pride or revenge (just intent).<\/em> []<\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00bbIncluded with the PowerPoint presentation are more than 500 pages of other documents [6] pertaining to a missile officer’s first week of training, which takes place before they are sent to one of three Air Force bases to guard the country’s Intercontinental Ballistic Missile (ICBM) arsenal and, if called upon to do so by the president, launch their nuclear-armed Minuteman IIIs.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00bbOne of the most disturbing slides quotes Wernher Von Braun [8], a former member of the Nazi Party and SS officer. Von Braun is not being cited in the PowerPoint as an authority on a liquid hydrogen turbopumps or a launch vehicle’s pogo oscillations, rather he’s specifically being referenced as a moral authority, which is remarkable considering that the Nazi scientist used Jews imprisoned in concentration camps, captured French anti-Nazi partisans and civilians, and others, to help build the V-2, a weapon responsible for the death of thousands of British civilians.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00bbWe knew that we had created a new means of warfare and the question as to what nation, to what victorious nation we were willing to entrust this brainchild of ours was a<\/em> moral d\u00e9cision<\/em><\/strong> more than anything else, Von Braun said upon surrendering to American forces in May 1945. We wanted to see the world spared another conflict such as Germany had just been through and we felt that only by surrendering such a weapon<\/em> to people who are guided by the Bible could such an assurance to the world be best secured<\/em><\/strong>. \tApr\u00e8s la publication de l’analyse de Truthout.org<\/em>, il y a eu une r\u00e9action tr\u00e8s rapide de l’USAF, annon\u00e7ant que les mat\u00e9riaux de pr\u00e9sentation incrimin\u00e9s \u00e9taient retir\u00e9s de la pr\u00e9sentation pour faire l’objet d’une enqu\u00eate, jusqu’\u00e0 une nouvelle d\u00e9cision \u00e0 leur \u00e9gard. On doit souligner la rapidit\u00e9 de cette d\u00e9cision, qui confirme d’une part une fois de plus qu’Internet est devenu un type de communication aussi fondamental que la communication parl\u00e9 et t\u00e9l\u00e9vis\u00e9e, ou la communication \u00e9crite et imprim\u00e9, dans ses effets publics ; d’autre part, l’extr\u00eame sensibilit\u00e9 de l’USAF \u00e0 la question soulev\u00e9e. (Il faut pr\u00e9ciser que l’importance du cas est sans aucun doute que cet endoctrinement de la non-responsabilit\u00e9 morale concerne un domaine absolument capital puisqu’il s’agit de la formation morale des cadres de la force nucl\u00e9aire strat\u00e9gique offensive des USA, plus pr\u00e9cis\u00e9ment des missiles ICBM de l’USAF.)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n \tLe 29 juillet 2011<\/a>, Truth.org<\/em> annon\u00e7ait le d\u00e9veloppement, avec la r\u00e9action imm\u00e9diate de l’USAF.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00abThe Air Force, in response to a report published by Truthout earlier this week, has pulled a Christian-themed training session that used a quote from an ex-Nazi SS officer and numerous passages from the New and Old Testament to teach missile officers about the morals and ethics of launching nuclear weapons.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00bbThe Nuclear Ethics and Nuclear Warfare training session has been taken out of the curriculum and is being reviewed, said David Smith, chief of public affairs of Air Education and Training Command at Randolph Air Force Base in Texas. The commander reviewed it and decided we needed to have a good hard look at it and make sure it reflected views of modern society.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00bbSmith said the ethics training has been in place for 20-plus years and the decision to remove it was made on Wednesday after Truthout’s report was published. He added that it will now be given thorough scrutiny and folks will be appointed to look at what we have and determine its utility and if they think its useful to continue having an ethics course they will develop a new course.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n \tIl ne s’agit certainement pas d’un incident isol\u00e9, d’une anecdote ou d’une aberration de passage, mais d’un exemple \u00e0 forte connotation symbolique comme il y en a \u00e9pisodiquement d’une longue tradition qui touche un flux essentiel de l’am\u00e9ricanisme, du complexe militaro-industriel \u00e0 Wall Street, \u00e0 certaines pratiques socio-industrielles en g\u00e9n\u00e9ral, \u00e0 certains aspects du d\u00e9veloppement scientifique et aux affirmations id\u00e9ologiques qui pars\u00e8ment la politique<\/a> de l’id\u00e9ologie et de l’instinct. Les r\u00e9f\u00e9rences \u00e0 Von Braun, ancien nazi et ancien officier de la SS r\u00e9cup\u00e9r\u00e9 prestement avec des centaines d’autres cadres de m\u00eame origine lors de l’op\u00e9ration Paper Clip<\/em> de 1945-1946, sont des choses commun\u00e9ment admises dans les marges id\u00e9ologiques de l’ensemble militaro-industriel, surtout dans ses activit\u00e9s a\u00e9ronautiques et spatiales. L’USAF se distingue \u00e9galement par des tendances religieuses radicales marqu\u00e9es, particuli\u00e8rement au sein de son Acad\u00e9mie nationale o\u00f9 sont form\u00e9s ses officiers (voir le 30 avril 2005<\/a>).<\/p>\n<\/p>\n \tOn trouvera sur ce site divers textes qui documentent ces tendances originelles dont le complexe militaro-industriel fut et reste la principale courroie de transmission au sein de l’am\u00e9ricanisme, l’USAF en \u00e9tant la branche la plus active, au niveau de la communication et parfois de manifestations plus exotiques. On s’arr\u00eate \u00e0 une publication du 26 janvier 2003<\/a>, avec deux extraits de textes particuli\u00e8rement int\u00e9ressants. <\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t Un extrait du livre City of Cristal<\/em>, de Mike Davies, r\u00e9sumant les d\u00e9buts id\u00e9ologiques du complexe militaro-industriel en Californie du Sud, marqu\u00e9s par une affirmation sans nuance du supr\u00e9matisme anglo-saxon, voire nordique ou aryen. Comme ces choses se passent en 1935-1936, ces mots ont une signification consid\u00e9rable. Il faut insister sur le fait qu’\u00e0 cette \u00e9poque, la composante militaire est totalement absente, alors que l’industrie a\u00e9rospatiale naissante est le bras arm\u00e9 de l’int\u00e9gration technologique dans le mouvement. La branche scientifique s’embarrasse moins des ukases<\/em> raciaux des id\u00e9ologues du mouvement puisqu’elle int\u00e8gre, via le Californian Institute of Technology (CalTech), des scientifiques juifs de premi\u00e8re dimension, comme Albert Einstein lui-m\u00eame. A partir de 1942, et massivement \u00e0 partir de 1944-45, le mouvement perdra son aversion anti-f\u00e9d\u00e9rale et anti-Roosevelt, avec l’arriv\u00e9e massive de la composante militaire. Le Complexe s’installe d\u00e8s lors au cur de la puissance am\u00e9ricaniste, dont il devient le moteur et, sans doute, bien au-del\u00e0, l’inspirateur. (On peut lire d’autres textes, sur ce site, concernant cette probl\u00e9matique de l’orientation id\u00e9ologique et des sp\u00e9cificit\u00e9s du Complexe \u00e0 son origine, par exemple le 19 ao\u00fbt 2008<\/a>.)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00abIn his role as Cal Tech’s chief booster, Millikan increasingly became an ideologue for a specific vision of science in Southern California. Speaking typically to luncheon meetings at the elite California Club in Downtown Los Angeles, or to banquets for the Associates at the Huntington mansion, Millikan adumbrated two fundamental points. First, Southern California was a unique scientific frontier where industry and academic research were joining hands to solve such fundamental challenges as the long-distance transmission of power and the generation of energy from sunlight. Secondly, and even more importantly, Southern California is today, as was England two hundred years ago, the westernmost outpost of Nordic civilization, with the exceptional opportunity of having a population which is twice as Anglo-Saxon as that existing in New York, Chicago or any of the great cities of this country.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00bbMillikan’s image of science and business reproducing Aryan supremacy on the shores of the Pacific undoubtedly warmed the hearts of his listeners, who like himself were conservative Taft-Hoover Republicans. An orthodox Social Darwinist, Millikan frequently invoked Herbert Spencer (the great thinker) in his fulminations against socialism (the coming slavery), the New Deal (political royalists), Franklin Roosevelt (Tammanyizing the United States), and statism in general. In the face of breadlines, he boasted the common man … is vastly better off here today in depressed America than he has ever been at any other epoch in society.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t Le deuxi\u00e8me texte est une interview de interview de Nick Cook, journaliste de Jane’s Defence Weekly<\/em> et auteur de livres sur le black world<\/em> du Pentagone, et sur les liens indirects et implicites, mais significatifs, entre le Pentagone et la n\u00e9buleuse de la science nazie et SS dans le domaine aussi bien des armements que de la recherche fondamentale. Cook, qui est un journaliste scientifique et technique, sans aucune qualification politique ou id\u00e9ologique, s’en tient au conformisme de rigueur dans ces domaines et reste extr\u00eamement prudent dans ses affirmations. Celles-ci, dont on doit deviner la substance cach\u00e9e, n’en sont que plus impressionnantes. Il y a un lien indirect \u00e9vident, certainement des perceptions et des conceptions similaires, dans le domaine scientifico-militaire, entre les nazis, et sp\u00e9cialement la SS, et le Pentagone \u00e0 ses origines. Il s’agit du pendant de l’aspect id\u00e9ologique vu plus haut. Par ailleurs, on retrouve ici la continuit\u00e9 m\u00e9tahistorique du syst\u00e8me du technologisme orient\u00e9 par l’id\u00e9al de puissance, qui est d’effectuer un transfert de sa dynamique de puissance entre le pangermanisme et le panam\u00e9ricanisme (du pangermanisme vers le panam\u00e9ricanisme), progressivement dans la p\u00e9riode englobant les deux guerres mondiales. La liquidation radicale du r\u00e9gime nazi compl\u00e9ta l’op\u00e9ration. Du point de vue de l’id\u00e9al de puissance, le panam\u00e9ricanisme est l’h\u00e9ritier du pangermanisme qui a pris son envol en 1890.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00ab[W]e know the size and scope of Operation Paperclip, which was huge. And we know that the U.S. operates a very deeply secret defense architecture for secret-weapons programs that we know as the black world. It is a highly compartmentalized system and one of the things that’s intrigued me over the years is, How did they develop that? What model did they base it on?<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00bbIt is remarkably similar to the system that was operated by the Germans specifically the SS for their top-secret weapons programs during the Second World War. Now, did someone, Hans Kammler or anyone else, provide that model lock, stock, and barrel to the U.S. government at the end of the war? I don’t know the answer to that, but given the massive recruitment that went on under Paperclip, and given what we see in the black world, it might not be unreasonable to ask those questions.<\/em> […]<\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00bbI’m not for a second saying that there is direct linkage there. What I do mean is that if you follow the trail of Nazi scientists and engineers who were recruited by America at the end of the Second World War, the unfortunate corollary is that by taking on the science, you take onunwittinglysome of the ideology. The science comes over tainted with something else. And that something else you have to be very careful of. It carries unpleasant side effects with it, in that if you’re not careful, you lose sight of what it is you’re protecting. What you’re ultimately trying to protect is U.S. national interest and U.S. security. But not at any cost. I think that’s the point that many people make who’ve brushed up against the black world and found their human rights violated by it. Not many have, but certainly some have. Those people question whether that unswerving loyalty to protecting high technology was worth it. What do you lose along the way? You lose some democracy, perhaps.<\/em> \u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n \tMis en ligne le 1er ao\u00fbt 2011 \u00e0 08H33<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Un \u00e9pisode bref mais significatif, conduit par le site Truthout.org, nous rappelle les fondements d’une des forces essentielles de l’am\u00e9ricanisme, qui est le syst\u00e8me du technologisme et le prolongement de l’id\u00e9al de puissance, ainsi que la similitude m\u00e9tahistorique des courants pangermaniste et panam\u00e9ricaniste. Cet \u00e9pisode concerne l’USAF, un des fondements, l\u00e0 aussi, de la puissance… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[3806,3012,3811,2631,2651,2778,11343,5053,4556,2779,3807,3014,4268],"class_list":["post-73942","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-cmi","tag-complexe","tag-cook","tag-de","tag-du","tag-ideal","tag-militaro-industrielle","tag-millikan","tag-nazisme","tag-puissance","tag-suprematisme","tag-systeme","tag-technologisme"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/73942","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=73942"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/73942\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=73942"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=73942"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=73942"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}