24 ao\u00fbt 2011<\/a>. Cette fois, il s’agit d’interventions de sources fran\u00e7aises, ou portant sur les projets et manigances fran\u00e7aise dans cette affaire.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00abFrench oil companies are likely to be among those hoping for lucrative oil contracts with a new government in Libya. But the cost of the intervention and the unknown agenda of the rebels could mean more losses than gains.<\/em> []<\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00bb One of the first members of the French team in Bengazhi in March was a representative of Total, the French oil company, and Total is not very far from all this of course, says Rony Braumann, president of Doctors without Borders (1982-1994).<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00bb It’s well known it’s a war for oil, the so-called opposition government has promised to give the oil to France, investigative journalist Michel Collon told RT.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00bbFrance officially claims its war mission is over. But analysts tip it to secretly stay on in Libya, and make sure it profits. France and the UK are maintaining their military presence in Libya, even though it’s not part of the resolution, Pierre Guerlain of Paris West University has said.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00bbBut keeping troops in the country means heavy costs drag on. Latest polls say most French people now oppose the military intervention. French MP and vice president of the National Front, Wallerand de Saint-Just, sees further bloodshed and a hefty price tag to deal with it. The war is far from over, he said. And this invasion is already costing much more than we get back.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00bbFears are growing that Libya’s new leaders are too divided to win the peace. Pierre Guerlain points to the rebels’ murder of their military chief General Younes last month. Experts warn widespread rebel looting and executions mean France’s problems may have only just begun.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n\tDeux explications similaires dans l’esprit, aussi cr\u00e9dibles l’une que l’autre, puisque toutes les deux \u00e9labor\u00e9es \u00e0 partir de sources qu’on suppose elles-m\u00eames d’excellent cr\u00e9dit et exprimant une perception bien dans l’air du temps. De m\u00eame, deux explications (les m\u00eames) oppos\u00e9es, pr\u00e9sentant deux situations chacune exclusive de l’autre, puisque portant sur des domaines o\u00f9 il n’est gu\u00e8re d’entente possible, m\u00eame, ou bien surtout, entre Fran\u00e7ais et Am\u00e9ricains, et enfin se prolongeant dans des visions compl\u00e8tement divergentes o\u00f9 l’on retrouve l’optimisme pr\u00eat\u00e9 aux Am\u00e9ricains et le pessimisme qui finit par ressortir chez les Fran\u00e7ais. Quant aux Britanniques, qui furent de la f\u00eate \u00e9galement comme parrains de premi\u00e8re cat\u00e9gorie, on les priera d’aller s’occuper des nuits agit\u00e9es de Tottenham. <\/p>\n<\/p>\n
\n
dedefensa.org<\/em><\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Explication(s) de l’aventure libyenne Deux textes de Russian Today s’attache \u00e0 l’affaire libyenne et \u00e0 son explication cach\u00e9e, ou \u00e0 peine cach\u00e9e puisque tout le monde sait que c’est une guerre pour le p\u00e9trole, comme l’observe un des journalistes cit\u00e9s par le site de la cha\u00eene russe de langue anglaise. En fait d’explication, il s’agit… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[14],"tags":[11428,4900,10891,6902,3600,11429],"class_list":["post-74006","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-ouverture-libre","tag-braumann","tag-escobar","tag-kadhafi","tag-libye","tag-petrole","tag-total"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/74006","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=74006"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/74006\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=74006"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=74006"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=74006"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}