{"id":74032,"date":"2011-09-03T16:23:20","date_gmt":"2011-09-03T16:23:20","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2011\/09\/03\/quand-la-cia-ecrivait-un-discours-pour-kadhafi\/"},"modified":"2011-09-03T16:23:20","modified_gmt":"2011-09-03T16:23:20","slug":"quand-la-cia-ecrivait-un-discours-pour-kadhafi","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2011\/09\/03\/quand-la-cia-ecrivait-un-discours-pour-kadhafi\/","title":{"rendered":"Quand la CIA \u00e9crivait un discours pour Kadhafi"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><h4>Quand la CIA \u00e9crivait un discours pour Kadhafi<\/h4>\n<p>Effectivement, c&rsquo;\u00e9taient en quelque sorte les temps b\u00e9nis des colonies, du temps de la coop\u00e9ration intense, voire parfois amicale, entre deux des principaux services du bloc BAO, la CIA am\u00e9ricaniste et le MI6 britannique, et le r\u00e9gime libyen du colonel Kadhafi Un long article du New York <em>Times<\/em> du <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2011\/09\/03\/world\/africa\/03libya.html?\" class=\"gen\">2 septembre 2011<\/a> d\u00e9taille le contenu d&rsquo;un certain nombre de documents d\u00e9couverts dans les bureaux de la direction des services de renseignement libyens. Il semble que leur authenticit\u00e9 soit assur\u00e9e ; si le MI6 a refus\u00e9 le moindre commentaire, la CIA, sous la forme d&rsquo;une d\u00e9claration d&rsquo;une des porte-paroles de l&rsquo;agence, Jennifer Youngblood, n&rsquo;a pas fait de commentaire direct \u00e0 propos explicitement des documents mais un commentaire g\u00e9n\u00e9ral particuli\u00e8rement rassurant : \u00ab<em>It can&rsquo;t come as a surprise that the Central Intelligence Agency works with foreign governments to help protect our country from terrorism and other deadly threats.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tDivers sujets sont couverts par ces documents, qui remontent \u00e0 2002 alors qu&rsquo;on pensait que cette coop\u00e9ration n&rsquo;avait d\u00e9but\u00e9 qu&rsquo;en 2004, lorsque Kadhafi a annonc\u00e9 son intention d&rsquo;abandonner le d\u00e9veloppement d&rsquo;armes de destruction massive. La preuve, dira-t-on, c&rsquo;est que la CIA avait elle-m\u00eame r\u00e9dig\u00e9 un discours, selon les formes les plus pr\u00e9cises de l&rsquo;apparat du colonel Kadhafi, pour justement annoncer cette d\u00e9cision, et qu&rsquo;elle lui avait fait parvenir \u00e0 la No\u00ebl 2003.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00ab<em>The documents cover 2002 to 2007, with many of them concentrated in late 2003 and 2004, when Moussa Koussa was head of the External Security Organization. (Mr. Koussa was most recently Libya&rsquo;s foreign minister.)<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>The speech that appears to have been drafted for Colonel Qaddafi was found in the C.I.A. folder and appears to have been sent just before Christmas in 2003. The one-page speech seems intended to depict the Libyan dictator in a positive light. It concluded, using the revolutionary name for the Libyan government: At a time when the world is celebrating the birth of Jesus, and as a token of our contributions towards a world full of peace, security, stability and compassion, the Great Jamhariya presents its honest call for a W.M.D.-free zone in the Middle East, referring to weapons of mass destruction.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tBien entendu, les documents exposent en d\u00e9tails la principale activit\u00e9 de coop\u00e9ration, qui \u00e9tait de transf\u00e9rer vers les interrogateurs libyens des prisonniers plus ou moins suspect\u00e9s d&rsquo;\u00eatre des membres de telle ou telle organisation pas tr\u00e8s bien vue. On retrouve \u00e9galement les traces de nombres de membres du LIFG (Libyan Islamic Fighter Group), qui forme un bon tiers des forces rebelles et qui a largement particip\u00e9 \u00e0 la bataille contre Kadhafi, et que la CIA soup\u00e7onnait alors, et sans la moindre h\u00e9sitation, d&rsquo;avoir des liens avec al Qa\u00efda ; de m\u00eame trouve-t-on la trace de l&rsquo;odyss\u00e9e de <a href=\"http:\/\/www.dedefensa.org\/article-rencontre_du_chef_islamique_de_tripoli_et_ami_de_l_otan__02_09_2011.html\" class=\"gen\">Abdulhakim Belhadj<\/a>, alias Abu Abdullah al-Sadiq, d\u00e9sormais chef militaire de Tripoli dont il a conduit l&rsquo;assaut.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00ab<em>One document in the C.I.A. binder said operatives were in a position to deliver Shaykh Musa to your physical custody, similar to what we have done with other senior L.I.F.G. members in the recent past. The reference was to the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group, which was dedicated to the overthrow of Colonel Qaddafi, and which American officials believed had ties to Al Qaeda.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>When Libyans asked to be sent Abu Abdullah al-Sadiq, another member of the group, a case officer wrote back on March 4, 2004, that we are committed to developing this relationship for the benefit of both our services, and promised to do their best to locate him, according to a document in the C.I.A. binder. Two days later, an officer faxed the Libyans to say that Mr. Sadiq and his pregnant wife were planning to fly into Malaysia, and the authorities there agreed to put them on a British Airways flight to London that would stop in Bangkok. We are planning to take control of the pair in Bangkok and place them on our aircraft for a flight to your country, the case officer wrote.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>Mr. Bouckaert of Human Rights Watch said he had learned from the documents that Sadiq was a nom de guerre for Abdel Hakim Belhaj, who is now a military leader for the rebels. In an interview on Wednesday, Mr. Belhaj gave a detailed description of his incarceration that matched many of those in the documents. He also said that when he was held in Bangkok he was tortured by two people from the C.I.A<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tPour poursuivre la nomenclature, on observera que l&rsquo;un ou l&rsquo;autre service ne d\u00e9daignait nullement d&rsquo;accomplir des missions pour les Libyens sur son propre territoire, comme le MI6 informant les services libyens de l&rsquo;identit\u00e9 et des activit\u00e9s de telle personne, habitant \u00e0 Londres et y travaillant. On a \u00e9galement des \u00e9chos de la concurrence et de la m\u00e9fiance r\u00e9gnant \u00e9galement entre MI6 et CIA, lorsqu&rsquo;il s&rsquo;agissait de s&rsquo;assurer de la coop\u00e9ration libyenne.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00ab<em>While questioning alleged terror group members plainly had value to Western intelligence, the cooperation went beyond that. In one case, for example, the Libyans asked operatives to trace a phone number for them, and a document that was in the MI-6 binder replied that it belonged to the Arab News Network in London. It is unclear why the Libyans sought who the phone number belonged to.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>The document also suggested signs of agency rivalries over Libya. In the MI-6 binder, a document boasted of having turned over someone named Abu Abd Alla to the Libyans. This was the least we could do for you to demonstrate the remarkable relationship we have built over recent years, an unsigned fax in 2004 said. Amusingly, we got a request from the Americans to channel requests for information from Abu Abd through the Americans. I have no intention of doing any such thing.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>\n<p class=\"signature\"><em>dedefensa.org<\/em><\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Quand la CIA \u00e9crivait un discours pour Kadhafi Effectivement, c&rsquo;\u00e9taient en quelque sorte les temps b\u00e9nis des colonies, du temps de la coop\u00e9ration intense, voire parfois amicale, entre deux des principaux services du bloc BAO, la CIA am\u00e9ricaniste et le MI6 britannique, et le r\u00e9gime libyen du colonel Kadhafi Un long article du New York&hellip;&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[14],"tags":[11463,11444,3104,10891,6902,4074,2807],"class_list":["post-74032","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-ouverture-libre","tag-abdulhakim","tag-belhadj","tag-cia","tag-kadhafi","tag-libye","tag-mi6","tag-renseignement"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/74032","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=74032"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/74032\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=74032"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=74032"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=74032"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}