{"id":74152,"date":"2011-10-17T12:17:59","date_gmt":"2011-10-17T12:17:59","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2011\/10\/17\/la-realite-na-pas-encore-compris-du-balai-ron-paul-du-balai\/"},"modified":"2011-10-17T12:17:59","modified_gmt":"2011-10-17T12:17:59","slug":"la-realite-na-pas-encore-compris-du-balai-ron-paul-du-balai","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2011\/10\/17\/la-realite-na-pas-encore-compris-du-balai-ron-paul-du-balai\/","title":{"rendered":"La r\u00e9alit\u00e9 n&rsquo;a pas encore compris : du balai, Ron Paul, du balai!"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>Le candidat \u00e0 la nomination r\u00e9publicaine Ron Paul vient encore de faire des siennes, sans autorisation-Syst\u00e8me semble-t-il ; de remporter une s\u00e9rie de victoires dans des <em>straw polls<\/em>, dans divers lieux politiques aux USA. La couverture presse-Styst\u00e8me de ces non-\u00e9v\u00e9nements (?) devient assez comique, et l&rsquo;on finit par consid\u00e9rer comme une sorte de nouvelle <em>democracy as usual<\/em> tr\u00e8s postmoderniste cette interdiction de para\u00eetre faite \u00e0 la v\u00e9rit\u00e9-selon-Ron Paul Il semblerait que l&rsquo;on envisagerait de ne plus s\u00e9rieusement convoquer la v\u00e9rit\u00e9, tant que celle-ci n&rsquo;aura pas adopt\u00e9 une attitude plus raisonnable. On ne veut plus entendre parler de Ron Paul, parce qu&rsquo;il n&rsquo;y a rien de s\u00e9rieux \u00e0 entendre \u00e0 ce propos.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t Comique, effectivement, c&rsquo;est ainsi que Doug Wead, conseiller de Ron Paul pour la campagne \u00e9lectorale, qualifie l&rsquo;attitude de la presse-Syst\u00e8me. (Sur <em>NewsMax.com<\/em>, le <a href=\"http:\/\/www.newsmax.com\/DougWead\/ron-paul-rand-straw\/2011\/10\/14\/id\/414543\" class=\"gen\">14 octobre 2001<\/a>.)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00ab<em>Yesterday, Ron Paul won the Los Angeles County straw poll. He had more votes than Romney and Cain combined. It was a small gathering but a confirmation of Paul&rsquo;s much larger victory in the California State Straw Poll last month. And like the California Poll, it was virtually ignored by the national media. They prefer to bask in denial and focus on Herman Cain&rsquo;s showing in the recent Florida straw poll whose delegates were actually chosen last summer.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>The distorted media coverage or lack of coverage of presidential candidate Ron Paul can sometimes reach comic proportions.Yesterday the New York Daily News solemnly told its readers that Herman Cain, having just raised $8 million, was third in fundraising in the Republican field, right behind Romney and Perry. Don&rsquo;t they wish. The truth is that Ron Paul is third and he is the candidate that raised the $8 million, not Herman Cain.<\/em> <\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>That&rsquo;s all right, Ron Paul supporters say. Keep it up. Nothing angers the Paulistas more than the flagrant favoritism and the manipulation of the media. On Oct. 19 the Ron Paul campaign is calling its next fundraiser, Black This Out a sarcastic response to debate hosts who purposely exclude him and blatantly promote their own favorites, regardless of the polls.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t L&rsquo;attitude des divers journaux de la presse-Syst\u00e8me est souvent remarquable dans la complexit\u00e9 des attitudes suivies pour \u00e9ventuellement annoncer que Paul a gagn\u00e9, tout en faisant savoir que cette victoire n&rsquo;a aucune valeur et qu&rsquo;il importe donc de n&rsquo;en point tenir compte. Le New York <em>Times<\/em> du <a href=\"http:\/\/thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com\/2011\/10\/08\/ron-paul-wins-conference-straw-poll-to-no-ones-surprise\/?pagemode=print\" class=\"gen\">8 octobre 2011<\/a>, annon\u00e7ait que personne n&rsquo;a \u00e9t\u00e9 surpris de sa victoire, parce que beaucoup d&rsquo;\u00e9tudiants sont venus voter pour lui (?), parce que les \u00e9lecteurs qui voteront s\u00fbrement pour Romney et Perry ne sont pas encore d\u00e9cid\u00e9s \u00e0 le faire (?), et que Paul est arriv\u00e9 en t\u00eate alors que ses opinions ne sont pas celles qu&rsquo;ont en g\u00e9n\u00e9ral les votants (?) Bref, il y a la r\u00e9alit\u00e9 certes, et puis une autre r\u00e9alit\u00e9 qui devrait \u00eatre en cours de formation, qui est d\u00e9favorable \u00e0 Ron Paul, mais qui ne s&rsquo;est pas encore manifest\u00e9e<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00ab<em>Wildly enthusiastic Ron Paul supporters, including busloads of college students, have been a visible presence at the Values Voters Summit in Washington, so no one was surprised when Mr. Paul won the conference&rsquo;s annual straw poll of presidential preferences on Saturday<\/em> [] <em>The field is still somewhat fluid, said Tony Perkins, president of the Family Research Council, as he discussed the results. The lesson for Mr. Romney and Mr. Perry, he said, is that the hearts and minds and passions of the values voters are still to be won.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>Only those who registered and paid to attend the conference were allowed to vote. The fee was $99 for the entire three-day meeting, or $75 for a single day, and $50 for students. Saturday morning, Mr. Perkins said, more than 600 people arrived and signed up just for the day, including large numbers of students in support of Mr. Paul. As a result, Mr. Paul won the most votes even though some of his views on defense and social policy differ sharply from those of most religious conservatives; he calls for a quick withdrawal from Afghanistan and says he does not fear a nuclear Iran, and he opposes a federal amendment to bar same-sex marriage.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t <em>Russia Today<\/em>, le <a href=\"http:\/\/rt.com\/usa\/news\/ron-paul-straw-poll-513\/\" class=\"gen\">11 octobre 2011<\/a>, rapporte, sur le ton sarcastique qui convient, comment la victoire de Paul n&rsquo;en est pas vraiment une<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00ab<em>Republican presidential candidate Ron Paul came in on top again at a straw poll over the weekend, but as usual the congressman from Texas is creating a bit of commotion with his continuing success. Rep. Paul placed first during the Values Voter Summit&rsquo;s straw poll in Washington this weekend, but Family Research Council President Tony Perkins quickly dismissed the results of his own survey, instead insisting that pizzaman Herman Cain was the real winner. I think there&rsquo;s something to be said about his results in the straw poll, Perkins said of Cain to CNN on Monday. Perkins was quick to denounce Paul&rsquo;s success. To CNN&rsquo;s American Morning on Monday today, Perkins said, I don&rsquo;t think Ron Paul is truly reflective of where values voters stand.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t Le <a href=\"http:\/\/communities.washingtontimes.com\/neighborhood\/general-factotum\/2011\/oct\/9\/what-straw-polls-mean-ron-paul-and-republicans\/\" class=\"gen\">9 octobre 2011<\/a> dans le Washington <em>Times<\/em>, il y avait un commentaire de Rich Stowell sur une des victoires de Ron Paul, dans le <em>straw poll<\/em> de Washington. Mais cette victoire \u00e9tait rapidement remise \u00e0 sa place, en fait, comme toute cette sorte de victoire, une victoire qui est plut\u00f4t la route vers l&rsquo;\u00e9limination <\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00ab<em>Ron Paul is certainly amped. Another straw poll victory for him. Were it not for Michele Bachmann&rsquo;s brief flirtation with top-tier status, he would now have four major straw poll wins on his resume this year. Paul has an extraordinarily disciplined and effective organization nationwide, ready to deploy at these major events. His win reflects as much.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>But what does it mean in the bigger scheme?<\/em> [] <em>Yet ironically, to the type of voter who is paying attention right now, it won&rsquo;t matter much. As Ms. Bachmann proved, momentum from straw polls can be elusive.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tEn m\u00eame temps que Ron Paul, <em>the pizzaman<\/em> (l&rsquo;homme qui a r\u00e9ussi dans la <em>pizza<\/em>), Herman Cain r\u00e9ussissait deux fois de suite dans deux <em>straw poll<\/em>, \u00e0 partir de la Floride le 24 septembre (voir ce qu&rsquo;en dit Doug Head plus haut). Et l\u00e0, curieusement, cette victoire dans la m\u00eame sorte d&rsquo;exercice devenait tr\u00e8s significative et il nous \u00e9tait annonc\u00e9 que, contrairement \u00e0 Ron Paul, la fortune de Cain semble consistante et en constant renforcement ; en effet, Ron Paul gagne tout le temps depuis deux ans, Cain n&rsquo;avait jamais gagn\u00e9 jusqu&rsquo;\u00e0 la consultation de Floride. La conclusion de Stowell est immanquable \u00ab<em>Interestingly, Herman Cain scored another victory in another straw poll on the same day as Paul. Unlike the Texas congressman, Cain&rsquo;s fortunes seem to be consistent and on the rise<\/em>\u00bb Herman Cain, apr\u00e8s Romney, Bachman, Romney (2\u00e8me tour) et Perry successivement, est le nouveau vainqueur-Syst\u00e8me garanti.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tComique, effectivement, essentiellement dans la maladresse in\u00e9vitable, tant la manuvre ne peut \u00eatre que grossi\u00e8re, et, au-del\u00e0, dans cette r\u00e9action instinctive qui est elle-m\u00eame vou\u00e9e \u00e0 se discr\u00e9diter elle-m\u00eame. (En effet, nous le r\u00e9p\u00e9tons, cette censure grotesque n&rsquo;est pas, selon notre conviction, une manuvre planifi\u00e9e, mais bien une r\u00e9action-Syst\u00e8me, que nous apparenterions \u00e0 un r\u00e9flexe pavlovien. Ron Paul est simplement insupportable, et il ne peut \u00eatre support\u00e9 dans la v\u00e9rit\u00e9-Syst\u00e8me qui, seule, int\u00e9resse la presse-Syst\u00e8me.) La t\u00e2che entreprise, qui est d&rsquo;\u00e9liminer l&rsquo;existence de communication de Ron Paul, n&rsquo;est pas simple ni ais\u00e9e \u00e0 mener \u00e0 bien. D&rsquo;aucuns sugg\u00e8reraient-ils de l&rsquo;\u00e9liminer compl\u00e8tement ? A notre sens, ils montreraient qu&rsquo;ils n&rsquo;ont pas compris l&rsquo;\u00e9volution \u00e0 son stade actuel des pratiques du Syst\u00e8me, qui massacre tout ce qu&rsquo;il faut pour ce qui est situ\u00e9 hors de ses normes, mais qui est paralys\u00e9 devant ce qui reste malgr\u00e9 tout dans ses structures institutionnalis\u00e9es ; ce qui est le cas de Ron Paul, parlementaire respect\u00e9, qu&rsquo;on ne peut ignorer ni \u00e9liminer en tant que tel, mais dont l&rsquo;existence doit pourtant \u00eatre ni\u00e9e en tant que candidat<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tA mesure qu&rsquo;avance la marche vers la campagne officielle (primaires r\u00e9publicaines en janvier-juillet 2012), on se dit que la persistance de la position de Rion Paul et la persistance du Syst\u00e8me \u00e0 repousser absolument son existence devraient nous conduire \u00e0 des points de convergence explosifs lorsqu&rsquo;auront lieu ces consultations \u00e9lectorales officielles. L&rsquo;explosif se trouvera soit dans les r\u00e9sultats eux-m\u00eames, soit dans les actes de d\u00e9sespoir pour influer sur ces r\u00e9sultats ou les modifier.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p><p>\tMis en ligne le 17 octobre 2011 \u00e0 12H17<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Le candidat \u00e0 la nomination r\u00e9publicaine Ron Paul vient encore de faire des siennes, sans autorisation-Syst\u00e8me semble-t-il ; de remporter une s\u00e9rie de victoires dans des straw polls, dans divers lieux politiques aux USA. La couverture presse-Styst\u00e8me de ces non-\u00e9v\u00e9nements (?) devient assez comique, et l&rsquo;on finit par consid\u00e9rer comme une sorte de nouvelle democracy&hellip;&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[8672,6251,3015,2631,11474,11588,2622,3570,3140,11396,3310,3775,3014,11547],"class_list":["post-74152","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-autocensure","tag-cain","tag-communication","tag-de","tag-doug","tag-herman","tag-la","tag-medias","tag-paul","tag-poll","tag-ron","tag-straw","tag-systeme","tag-wead"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/74152","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=74152"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/74152\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=74152"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=74152"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=74152"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}