{"id":74249,"date":"2011-11-15T13:55:09","date_gmt":"2011-11-15T13:55:09","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2011\/11\/15\/les-europeens-et-lattaque-de-liran-4-denthousiasme\/"},"modified":"2011-11-15T13:55:09","modified_gmt":"2011-11-15T13:55:09","slug":"les-europeens-et-lattaque-de-liran-4-denthousiasme","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2011\/11\/15\/les-europeens-et-lattaque-de-liran-4-denthousiasme\/","title":{"rendered":"Les Europ\u00e9ens et l&rsquo;attaque de l&rsquo;Iran : 4% d&rsquo;enthousiasme"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><h4>Les Europ\u00e9ens et l&rsquo;attaque de l&rsquo;Iran : 4% d&rsquo;enthousiasme<\/h4>\n<p>Pour l&rsquo;instant,  car les choses peuvent changer et, parfois, changent bien vite, si BHL se met de la partie,  les Europ\u00e9ens semblent assez peu enthousiastes pour la vraie-fausse attaque qui se pr\u00e9pare, ou fait mine de se pr\u00e9parer, contre l&rsquo;Iran. Cette fois, une fois encore disons, le Fran\u00e7ais Jupp\u00e9 prend ses marques r\u00e9solument contre l&rsquo;attaque, comme il l&rsquo;avait fait dans le cas de la Libye ; en esp\u00e9rant, pour lui, Jupp\u00e9, que BHL ne tombe pas sur une carte de la r\u00e9gion ou sur un mot du <em>Mossad<\/em> (faction anti-<a href=\"http:\/\/www.dedefensa.org\/article-l_ancien_chef_du_mossad_et_l_attaque_contre_l_iran_10_11_2011.html\" class=\"gen\">Dagan<\/a>) et ne s&rsquo;avise de la n\u00e9cessit\u00e9 de lib\u00e9rer l&rsquo;Iran.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tDu site iranien <em>Press.TV.com<\/em>, l&rsquo;un des plus s\u00e9rieux en la mati\u00e8re, ces remarques du <a href=\"http:\/\/presstv.com\/detail\/210151.html\" class=\"gen\">15 novembre 2011<\/a> sur les positions des Europ\u00e9ens.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00ab<em>French Foreign Minister Alain Juppe has repeated a word of caution against military action against the Islamic Republic of Iran, warning of the consequences. Military intervention would take things from bad to worse and would drag us into an uncontrollable spiral, he said, speaking after a European Council meeting in Brussels, Belgium on Monday, IRNA reported.<\/em> <\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>His Swedish counterpart Carl Bildt has also opposed such military action, saying &lsquo;some hype&rsquo; was built around the last week report by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) on Iran&rsquo;s nuclear program. I don&rsquo;t think any military response is justified or called for. We have to solve this by diplomatic means, he said.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>Earlier in the day, German Foreign Minister Guido Westerwelle said likewise that Berlin would not discuss a military operation against Iran and noted, We are not taking part in the discussion on military intervention. We believe such discussions are counterproductive and we reject them.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tD&rsquo;autre part, il faut bien les comprendre, les Europ\u00e9ens, comme nous dit \u00e9galement <em>Press.TV.com<\/em>, le m\u00eame <a href=\"http:\/\/presstv.com\/detail\/210106.html\" class=\"gen\">15 novembre 2011<\/a>, lorsqu&rsquo;on constate que le public europ\u00e9en est favorable \u00e0 une attaque de l&rsquo;Iran, \u00e0 raison de 4% des personnes interrog\u00e9es lors d&rsquo;un r\u00e9cent sondage. Dans ces p\u00e9riodes de crises, de semi-insurrection du public, de campagne pr\u00e9sidentielle et ainsi de suite, m\u00eame BHL aura peut-\u00eatre du mal \u00e0 trouver portes ouvertes \u00e0 l&rsquo;Elys\u00e9e pour communiquer son plan de lib\u00e9ration de l&rsquo;Iran. Ainsi se b\u00e2tissent les convictions (celle de Sarko, en l&rsquo;occurrence)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00ab<em>A recent survey shows that only four percent of the population in the European Union support a military attack against Iran over its nuclear program.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>According to the phone survey conducted between October 18 and 24 by Der Deutsche Marshall Fund Research Company, with a sampling of 2,000 people, 32 percent of the respondents said they believe economic incentives will resolve the impasse over Iran&rsquo;s nuclear case. Twenty-eight percent of those surveyed said they are in favor of tougher sanctions against Iran, and 15 percent said they support efforts to help dissidents and the opposition.<\/em> <\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>Only four percent of respondents said they agree with military intervention in Iran over its nuclear activities, and 16 percent had no opinion.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>\n<p class=\"signature\"><em>dedefensa.org<\/em><\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Les Europ\u00e9ens et l&rsquo;attaque de l&rsquo;Iran : 4% d&rsquo;enthousiasme Pour l&rsquo;instant, car les choses peuvent changer et, parfois, changent bien vite, si BHL se met de la partie, les Europ\u00e9ens semblent assez peu enthousiastes pour la vraie-fausse attaque qui se pr\u00e9pare, ou fait mine de se pr\u00e9parer, contre l&rsquo;Iran. Cette fois, une fois encore disons,&hellip;&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[14],"tags":[3417,9636,398,2773,10349],"class_list":["post-74249","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-ouverture-libre","tag-bhl","tag-dagan","tag-europe","tag-iran","tag-juppe"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/74249","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=74249"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/74249\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=74249"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=74249"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=74249"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}