{"id":74251,"date":"2011-11-16T06:04:59","date_gmt":"2011-11-16T06:04:59","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2011\/11\/16\/ron-paul-occupy-les-sondages\/"},"modified":"2011-11-16T06:04:59","modified_gmt":"2011-11-16T06:04:59","slug":"ron-paul-occupy-les-sondages","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2011\/11\/16\/ron-paul-occupy-les-sondages\/","title":{"rendered":"Ron Paul : Occupy<\/em> les sondages ?"},"content":{"rendered":"

Surprise des surprises : un sondage national US (sur les candidats r\u00e9publicains dans l’Iowa) semble avoir \u00e9chapp\u00e9 \u00e0 la vigilance de la marche de l’Histoire dans le bon sens et place Ron Paul pratiquement en t\u00eate des candidats r\u00e9publicains \u00e0 la d\u00e9signation, \u00e0 1% de l’incertain Cain, qui avait jailli des oubliettes (autour de 1% des sondages) pour bondir en t\u00eate, 6% \u00e0 8% devant tout le monde, avant d’entamer un recul qui suit quelques r\u00e9v\u00e9lations strat\u00e9giques sur le harassement sexuel (de sa part) et la documentation de ses incomp\u00e9tences diverses. Bref, Ron Paul est deuxi\u00e8me dans un sondage national (Bloomberg), avec 19%, contre 20% \u00e0 Cain A cela, on peut r\u00e9torquer qu’un autre sondage parall\u00e8le et national, plus conforme au sens de l’Histoire, place Ron Paul \u00e0 5%, tr\u00e8s loin derri\u00e8re la horde de ses impressionnants et intellectuels concurrents, dont l’ahurissant et mirobolant Newt Gingrich, premier avec 28% apr\u00e8s avoir \u00e9t\u00e9 entre 0,5% et 1,5% pendant des mois.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tSelon RAW Story<\/em> du 15 novembre 2011<\/a>.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00abA surprising new poll out of Bloomberg News on Tuesday morning found that former House Speaker Newt Gingrich (R-GA) is not the only Republican to benefit from the seeming demise of other prior frontrunners.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbBeating all the odds and the pundits’ expectations, Rep. Ron Paul (R-TX) has emerged as one of the new frontrunners for the GOP nomination to the presidency, topping even Gingrich and former Mass. Gov. Mitt Romney and virtually tying former businessman Herman Cain for the lead. All surveys counted, Bloomberg News found that Paul has the support of 19 percent of GOP primary voters, versus Cain’s 20, Romney’s 18 and Gingrich’s 17.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbIt’s just the latest in a string of small victories for Paul, who won a Calif. straw poll in Sept., an Ohio straw poll in Oct. and an Illinois straw poll earlier this month. He also dominated a CBS News viewer survey this week, which asked who won the last GOP debate and who should win the nomination. Paul topped all the other candidates by tens of thousands of votes, even though he was only given 89 seconds during the entire debate to speak.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbThe four-way tie moving forward will present an interesting challenge to conservative media, which seems to have been content ignoring Paul as much as possible. Even in the instances where he’s won or placed highly in typically influential Republican polls, his victories have been swept under the rug as pundits continued to focus on candidates thought to be more favored by Republicans.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbHe’s since become regarded in much mainstream press as something of a gadfly, and not likely a serious contender. If I were Romney and Perry, I would be thinking of a way to get Ron Paul off the stage because he is a distraction, Bradley Blakeman, a Republican strategist and former Bush staffer, explained to Fox Business in Sept., articulating party insiders’ prevailing opinions of Paul. Those opinions would now appear to be irrelevant, but it’s still unclear if the latest poll results will earn Paul any additional headway with members of the press.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbA separate poll published Monday by survey group Public Policy Polling found Paul at just 5 percent support, with Gingrich leading the pack at 28 percent. Earlier polling by Selzer & Co., which conducted Tuesday’s Bloomberg poll, found that Paul had solidly claimed third place by mid-Oct. with 12 percent support, trailing Romney at 22 and Cain at 23.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tIl faut noter que le r\u00e9sultat inattendu et sensationnel, vu le complot-farce contre lui, des 19% de Ron Paul dans le sondage national Bloomberg continue, dans certains m\u00e9dias de la presse-Syst\u00e8me, \u00e0 \u00eatre trait\u00e9 par la seule pr\u00e9cision du d\u00e9compte, sans le moindre commentaire, dans des articles sur le sujet orient\u00e9s sur des sujets-Syst\u00e8me plus conformes. Le Guardian<\/em> du 19 novembre 2011<\/a> se retrouve dans cette cat\u00e9gorie douteuse, avec son article consacr\u00e9 aux gaffes et insuffisances de l’int\u00e9ressant Herman Cain. Enfouie dans un paragraphe perdu l’article, cette simple pr\u00e9cision, qui dit bien que Ron Paul est \u00e0 19%, mais cela implicitement sans signification puisqu’il est \u00e9tiquette maverick<\/em>, au contraire des autres, \u00e0 la fois si s\u00e9rieux et si cr\u00e9atifs : \u00abIn a poll by the Bloomberg news agency among Republicans in Iowa, Cain won 20% of those who say they are likely to participate in the caucus. Ron Paul, a maverick libertarian, registered 19%, Mitt Romney, the front-runner nationally, 18%, and former House Speaker Newt Gingrich 17%.<\/em>\u00bb <\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tLa farce des sondages nationaux, totalement et grossi\u00e8rement manipul\u00e9s, est en pleine d\u00e9b\u00e2cle, \u00e0 l’image des candidats r\u00e9publicains grossi\u00e8rement incomp\u00e9tents et lobotomis\u00e9s pour ce qui concerne leurs programmes, leurs avis et leurs r\u00e9flexions (tout cela sauf le pestif\u00e9r\u00e9 Ron Paul, qui ricane de plus en plus), \u00e0 l’image du silencieux Obama, \u00e0 l’image du processus politique US La dr\u00f4lerie du d\u00e9sordre, ou du complot en tr\u00e8s grand d\u00e9sordre, est que l’ostracisme contre le non-\u00eatre Ron Paul laisse passer le susdit non-\u00eatre par intermittence. Le complot est donc effectivement une farce, et la d\u00e9termination de Ron Paul d’envisager<\/a> une candidature ind\u00e9pendante d\u00e9termin\u00e9e et peut-\u00eatre irr\u00e9sistible ne peut \u00eatre que grandissante et renforc\u00e9e.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tDans cette attente, il existe d\u00e9sormais une pouss\u00e9e, de la part de certaines organisations d’opposition \u00e0 la marge de la dissidence et repr\u00e9sentants des associations de citoyens, pour demander une r\u00e9gulation officielle des sondages. Cette demande a fort peu de chances d’aboutir, comme celle sur la r\u00e9gulation des banques, mais va contribuer \u00e0 renforcer le statut de Ron Paul, et \u00e0 en faire le seul candidat valable dans la horde des r\u00e9publicains lobotomis\u00e9s, hors sondages.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tLa farce des variations de Paul dans les sondages nationaux, compar\u00e9e \u00e0 la stabilit\u00e9 de ses victoires dans les sondages locaux in vivo<\/em> (straw poll<\/em>) constitue \u00e0 la longue un coup tr\u00e8s d\u00e9vastatateur port\u00e9 contre les activit\u00e9s statistiques du Syst\u00e8me, dans sa volont\u00e9 d’ignorer un candidat impensable pour une des deux ailes du parti unique. Le renforcement in\u00e9luctable de la popularit\u00e9 vraie<\/strong> de Paul ne peut s’en trouver qu’accentu\u00e9e, et, au-del\u00e0, la perspective de surprises int\u00e9ressantes pour la campagne des pr\u00e9sidentielles et l’\u00e9lection de novembre 2012.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

\tMis en ligne le 16 novembre 2011 \u00e0 06H01<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Surprise des surprises : un sondage national US (sur les candidats r\u00e9publicains dans l’Iowa) semble avoir \u00e9chapp\u00e9 \u00e0 la vigilance de la marche de l’Histoire dans le bon sens et place Ron Paul pratiquement en t\u00eate des candidats r\u00e9publicains \u00e0 la d\u00e9signation, \u00e0 1% de l’incertain Cain, qui avait jailli des oubliettes (autour de 1%… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[11689,6683,6251,3140,3310,5190],"class_list":["post-74251","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-blackout","tag-bloomberg","tag-cain","tag-paul","tag-ron","tag-sondage"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/74251","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=74251"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/74251\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=74251"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=74251"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=74251"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}