{"id":74299,"date":"2011-12-05T10:02:23","date_gmt":"2011-12-05T10:02:23","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2011\/12\/05\/meme-le-new-york-times-ne-gobe-plus-completement-le-mensonge-systeme\/"},"modified":"2011-12-05T10:02:23","modified_gmt":"2011-12-05T10:02:23","slug":"meme-le-new-york-times-ne-gobe-plus-completement-le-mensonge-systeme","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2011\/12\/05\/meme-le-new-york-times-ne-gobe-plus-completement-le-mensonge-systeme\/","title":{"rendered":"M\u00eame le New York Times<\/em> ne gobe plus (compl\u00e8tement) le mensonge-Syst\u00e8me\u2026"},"content":{"rendered":"

Le bon Papa No\u00ebl a fait au souriant pr\u00e9sident Obama un cadeau mirifique. Dans sa hotte, il avait le chiffre de la chute du ch\u00f4mage de 9,1% \u00e0 8,6% en un mois. (Nous laissons de c\u00f4t\u00e9 le chiffre r\u00e9el<\/strong> du ch\u00f4mage, dont on sait qu’il est au minimum le double des chiffres officiels, si pas deux fois et demi. Nous d\u00e9battons bien de l’aspect officiel, du d\u00e9compte-Syst\u00e8me de la chose.) Extase devant la r\u00e9ussite sociale de la pr\u00e9sidence Obama, cela m\u00e9ritant bien une r\u00e9\u00e9lection, n’est-ce pas ? La chute inesp\u00e9r\u00e9e (?) de cet affreux indice du malheur populaire a \u00e9t\u00e9 accueillie avec un enthousiasme qu’on d\u00e9couvre finalement comme sacr\u00e9ment mitig\u00e9, et c’est bien l\u00e0 la surprise de la chose.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tLes fouineurs ont aussit\u00f4t d\u00e9tect\u00e9 la cause de cette chute du ch\u00f4mage, par ailleurs \u00e9vidente. Il s’agit, \u00e0 c\u00f4t\u00e9 de la cr\u00e9ation de 120.000 emplois, d’une d\u00e9fection massive<\/strong> du nombre d’Am\u00e9ricains inscrits au ch\u00f4mage, c’est-\u00e0-dire de personnes ayant perdu tout espoir de trouver un emploi et, d\u00e8s lors, qui se d\u00e9sinscrivent des canaux officiels et ne figurent plus dans le recensement officiel : 315.000 personnes. Russia Today<\/em>, qui qualifie de mensonge officiel ce chiffre du ch\u00f4mage, d\u00e9veloppe, ce 3 d\u00e9cembre 2011<\/a> le m\u00e9canisme du proc\u00e9d\u00e9. Il est donc toujours question des chiffres officiels<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00abNovember’s figure, 8.6 percent, is actually the proportion of Americans unemployed, as a percent of the civilian labor force, as per the official definition from the Labor Department (a figure it refers to as U-3, the official unemployment rate). When considering those that fit that definition as well as discouraged workers (U-4), those marginally attached to the work labor force (U-5) and those that are employed part-time and seeking full-time employment but can’t find it, the Labor Department has another statistic, which it refers to as U-6; for the month of November, that figure is at 15.6 percent.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbThe actual number of Americans who have given up a while ago isn’t firm, but the latest statistics though painted pretty by the Department of Labor reveal that November saw 315,000 new Americans abandoning their job hunt. You’d like to see the unemployment rate coming down when people are coming into the job market, not disappearing, James Glassman of New York City’s JP Morgan Chase & Co. tells Bloomberg News. That’s probably exaggerating the trend in unemployment.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbAs civilians leave the labor force, obviously the percentage of those participating in the market drops as well. Should the jobless numbers be compared to those participating in the labor force when Obama entered office in 2009, the U-3 unemployment rate would be at around 11 percent now, reports CNBC contributor James Pethokoukis.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tRussia Today<\/em> termine son article par une remarque d’un sp\u00e9cialiste statistique de la question, qui rel\u00e8ve comme quasiment sans pr\u00e9c\u00e9dent le nombre de personnes abandonnant la recherche d’un emploi et donc l’inscription au ch\u00f4mage. Cela signifie que la masse de la labor force<\/em> est en constante r\u00e9gression, avec l’extension incessante par cons\u00e9quent de masses de citoyens US se retrouvant compl\u00e8tement hors des normes officielles du Syst\u00e8me, en v\u00e9ritables dissidents \u00e9conomiques C’est l\u00e0 une remarque particuli\u00e8rement int\u00e9ressante. \u00abSteve Eggleston of Hot Air adds that this seasonal drop in the civilian labor force is almost unprecedented for this time of year. Since 1982, there have been only seven times the labor force has dropped between an October and a November, and only three times has the drop been even close to this steep, adds Eggleston.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tUn autre aspect int\u00e9ressant, d\u00e9j\u00e0 signal\u00e9 plus haut, est le scepticisme avec lequel a \u00e9t\u00e9 accueillie la nouvelle de cette spectaculaire r\u00e9duction du Syst\u00e8me. Fort justement, Truthdig.org<\/em> observe que m\u00eame<\/strong> le New York Times<\/em>, l’incontestable bible du Syst\u00e8me, s’est arrang\u00e9 pour \u00e0 la fois applaudir d’une fa\u00e7on habituelle pour lui ce chiffre (un article optimiste-Syst\u00e8me du 3 d\u00e9cembre 2011<\/a>) et \u00e0 la fois dire tr\u00e8s fortement<\/strong> tout le scepticisme qu’il faut manifester \u00e0 son encontre, et cela dans un \u00e9ditorial (ce qui est plus marquant qu’un article) du m\u00eame 3 d\u00e9cembre 2011<\/a>. Truthdig.org<\/em> \u00e9crit donc, le 4 d\u00e9cembre 2011<\/a> (lLa citation de l’\u00e9dito du NYT est effectivement impressionnante) :<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00abInterestingly, The New York Times offered two different takes on the new numbers. Somehow the American economy appears to be getting better, the author of an optimistic article began, before suggesting that the European debt crisis, instability in the Middle East and the slowdown of Chinese industry were greater concerns than domestic joblessness, and that November’s decline was a welcome relief.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbElsewhere, the paper’s editors were less sanguine. ARK<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbThe New York Times: Most of the decline in November’s unemployment rate was not because jobless people found new work. Rather, it is because 315,000 people dropped out of the work force, a reflection of extraordinarily weak demand by employers for new workers. It is also a sign of socioeconomic decline, of wasted resources and untapped potential, the human equivalent of boarded-up Main Streets and shuttered factories.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbThe job growth numbers also come with caveats. More jobs were created than economists expected, but with the job market so weak for so long, that is a low bar. It would take nearly 11 million new jobs to replace the ones that were lost during the recession and to keep up with the growth in the working-age population in the last four years. To fill that gap would require 275,000 new jobs a month for the next five years. That’s not in the cards. Even with the better-than-expected job growth in the past three months, the economy added only 143,000 jobs on average.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbAnd most of those new jobs are low-end ones. In November, for example, big job-growth areas included retail sales, bartending and temporary services. Teachers and other public employees continued to lose jobs, and job growth in construction and manufacturing were basically flat. Indeed, work once the pathway to a rising standard of living has become for many a route to downward mobility. Motoko Rich reported in The Times recently on new research showing that most people who lost their jobs in recent years now make less and have not maintained their lifestyles, with many experiencing what they describe as drastic and probably irreversible declines in income.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tOn distingue, dans ces diverses circonstances et les commentaires qui les accompagnent une \u00e9volution fondamentale de la situation aux USA. En un mot, il appara\u00eet que le Syst\u00e8me n’a d\u00e9sormais plus assez de puissance pour imposer, m\u00eame temporairement, une vision plus optimiste de la situation. Cela correspond bien, au travers de l’activit\u00e9 du syst\u00e8me de la communication, \u00e0 la supr\u00e9matie en constant renforcement de la dynamique d’autodestruction du Syst\u00e8me sur sa dynamique de surpuissance, en constant d\u00e9clin selon un rapport relatif de cause \u00e0 effet. La r\u00e9action du NYT est \u00e0 cet \u00e9gard extr\u00eamement r\u00e9v\u00e9latrice : m\u00eame les bastions les plus s\u00fbrs du Syst\u00e8me ne se sentent plus assez forts, ou sentent effectivement le d\u00e9clin de cette surpuissance du Syst\u00e8me, pour soutenir inconditionnellement, m\u00eame temporairement, l’habituelle litanie des mensonges-Syst\u00e8me, dont les indices statistiques sont une des manifestations courantes.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tL’autre constat, qui concerne la r\u00e9duction de la labor force<\/em> dans une proportion pratiquement sans pr\u00e9c\u00e9dent, indique une d\u00e9sertion massive de la population des normes du Syst\u00e8me. Il y a l\u00e0-dedans l’indice autant du d\u00e9sespoir devant l’\u00e9volution de la situation, que de son double agressif, qui est le potentiel insurrectionnel \u00e9galement devant l’\u00e9volution de la situation. Mais il faut nuancer ce autant que nous avons utilis\u00e9 Compte tenu de l’environnement psychologique actuel, du succ\u00e8s obtenu par le mouvement Occupy<\/em>, de la fragilit\u00e9 de la situation US et des crises sans nombre qui ne cessent de se d\u00e9velopper et d’alimenter les revendications et la col\u00e8re populaire, on avancera l’hypoth\u00e8se qu’il y a dans cette d\u00e9sertion des normes du Syst\u00e8me bien plus le signe du d\u00e9veloppement du sentiment insurrectionnel que l’abattement dans un d\u00e9sespoir qui, lui, n’est pas une nouveaut\u00e9. Pouss\u00e9 \u00e0 un certain degr\u00e9 et alors que les circonstances de la psychologie collective impose un Moment fondamental de celle-ci, le d\u00e9sespoir d\u00e9bouche effectivement sur l’option de l’insurrection.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

\tMis en ligne le 5 d\u00e9cembre 2011 \u00e0 10H03<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Le bon Papa No\u00ebl a fait au souriant pr\u00e9sident Obama un cadeau mirifique. Dans sa hotte, il avait le chiffre de la chute du ch\u00f4mage de 9,1% \u00e0 8,6% en un mois. (Nous laissons de c\u00f4t\u00e9 le chiffre r\u00e9el du ch\u00f4mage, dont on sait qu’il est au minimum le double des chiffres officiels, si pas… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[4270,3354,3318,11746,11747,3256,7622,11131,2852,3257],"class_list":["post-74299","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-autodestruction","tag-chomage","tag-force","tag-labor","tag-mensonge-systeme","tag-new","tag-nyt","tag-surpuissance","tag-times","tag-york"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/74299","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=74299"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/74299\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=74299"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=74299"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=74299"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}