{"id":74324,"date":"2011-12-14T12:28:37","date_gmt":"2011-12-14T12:28:37","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2011\/12\/14\/la-tortue-le-dr-ron-paul-se-rapproche-de-liowa\/"},"modified":"2011-12-14T12:28:37","modified_gmt":"2011-12-14T12:28:37","slug":"la-tortue-le-dr-ron-paul-se-rapproche-de-liowa","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2011\/12\/14\/la-tortue-le-dr-ron-paul-se-rapproche-de-liowa\/","title":{"rendered":"La tortue (le Dr. Ron Paul) se rapproche de l&rsquo;Iowa"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><h4>La tortue (le Dr. Ron Paul) se rapproche de l&rsquo;Iowa  <\/h4>\n<p>Apr\u00e8s le <a href=\"http:\/\/www.dedefensa.org\/article-ron_paul_avant_l_iowa_triomphant_et_rassembleur__12_12_2011.html\" class=\"gen\">d\u00e9bat<\/a> entre les candidats r\u00e9publicains pour le <em>Caucus<\/em> de l&rsquo;Iowa du 3 janvier 2012, un nouveau sondage montre une accentuation tr\u00e8s nette de la popularit\u00e9 de Ron Paul qui n&rsquo;est plus d\u00e9sormais, selon un sondage de <em>PublicPolicy.polling<\/em> du <a href=\"http:\/\/www.publicpolicypolling.com\/main\/2011\/12\/paul-closes-in-on-gingrich.html\" class=\"gen\">13 d\u00e9cembre 2011<\/a> qu&rsquo;\u00e0 un point de Newt Gingrich (21% pour Paul, 22% pour Gingrich). Les plus r\u00e9centes positions \u00e9taient de 18% (Paul) contre 25% (Gingrich). La dynamique Ron Paul continue \u00e0 tourner \u00e0 toute allure.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tUne phrase de commentaire qu&rsquo;on commence \u00e0 lire r\u00e9guli\u00e8rement : le parcours de Ron Paul vers le <em>Caucus<\/em> de l&rsquo;Iowa (gagn\u00e9 le 3 janvier 2008 par Barack Obama) ressemble de plus en plus \u00e0 celui de Barack Obama, dont on conna\u00eet d\u00e9sormais le destin.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00ab<em>There has been some major movement in the Republican Presidential race in Iowa over the last week, with what was a 9 point lead for Newt Gingrich now all the way down to a single point. Gingrich is at 22% to 21% for Paul with Mitt Romney at 16%, Michele Bachmann at 11%, Rick Perry at 9%, Rick Santorum at 8%, Jon Huntsman at 5%, and Gary Johnson at 1%.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>Gingrich has dropped 5 points in the last week and he&rsquo;s also seen a significant decline in his favorability numbers. Last week he was at +31 (62\/31) and he&rsquo;s now dropped 19 points to +12 (52\/40). The attacks on him appear to be taking a heavy toll- his support with Tea Party voters has declined from 35% to 24%.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>Paul meanwhile has seen a big increase in his popularity from +14 (52\/38) to +30 (61\/31).  There are a lot of parallels between Paul&rsquo;s strength in Iowa and Barack Obama&rsquo;s in 2008- he&rsquo;s doing well with new voters, young voters, and non-Republican voters:<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em> * 59% of likely voters participated in the 2008 Republican caucus and they support Gingrich 26-18.  But among the 41% of likely voters who are new&rsquo; for 2012 Paul leads Gingrich 25-17 with Romney at 16%.  Paul is doing a good job of bringing out folks who haven&rsquo;t done this before.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em> * He&rsquo;s also very strong with young voters.  Among likely caucus goers under 45 Paul is up 30-16 on Gingrich.  With those over 45, Gingrich leads him 26-15 with Romney at 17%.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em> * Among Republicans Gingrich leads Paul 25-17. But with voters who identify as Democrats or independents, 21% of the electorate in a year with no action on the Democratic side, Paul leads Gingrich 34-14 with Romney at 17%.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>Young voters, independents, and folks who haven&rsquo;t voted in caucuses before is an unusual coalition for a Republican candidate&#8230;the big question is whether these folks will really come out and vote&#8230;if they do, we could be in for a big upset.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>Paul&rsquo;s supporters are considerably more committed to him than Gingrich&rsquo;s are. 77% of current Paul voters say they&rsquo;re definitely going to vote for him, compared to only 54% for Gingrich.  Romney has much more solid support than Gingrich as well, 67% of his voters saying they&rsquo;re with him for the long haul. Among only voters who say their mind&rsquo;s totally made up, 29% support Paul to 21% for Gingrich, 18% for Romney, and 11% for Bachmann.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>\n<p class=\"signature\"><em>dedefensa.org<\/em><\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>La tortue (le Dr. Ron Paul) se rapproche de l&rsquo;Iowa Apr\u00e8s le d\u00e9bat entre les candidats r\u00e9publicains pour le Caucus de l&rsquo;Iowa du 3 janvier 2012, un nouveau sondage montre une accentuation tr\u00e8s nette de la popularit\u00e9 de Ron Paul qui n&rsquo;est plus d\u00e9sormais, selon un sondage de PublicPolicy.polling du 13 d\u00e9cembre 2011 qu&rsquo;\u00e0 un&hellip;&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[14],"tags":[4566,7340,6208,3140,3310,1492],"class_list":["post-74324","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-ouverture-libre","tag-gingrich","tag-iowa","tag-obama","tag-paul","tag-ron","tag-sondages"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/74324","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=74324"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/74324\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=74324"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=74324"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=74324"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}