{"id":74441,"date":"2012-01-23T05:00:50","date_gmt":"2012-01-23T05:00:50","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2012\/01\/23\/loption-to-kill-bho-ou-le-commentaire-dun-idiot-utile\/"},"modified":"2012-01-23T05:00:50","modified_gmt":"2012-01-23T05:00:50","slug":"loption-to-kill-bho-ou-le-commentaire-dun-idiot-utile","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2012\/01\/23\/loption-to-kill-bho-ou-le-commentaire-dun-idiot-utile\/","title":{"rendered":"L’option \u201cto kill BHO<\/em>\u201d, ou le commentaire d’un \u201cidiot utile\u201d"},"content":{"rendered":"

Un commentaire du 13 janvier d’une personne (Andrew Adler) qui est pr\u00e9sent\u00e9e comme l’obscur \u00e9diteur et directeur d’un tout aussi obscur Jewish Times<\/em> d’Atlanta, secoue diablement les relations r\u00e9elles<\/strong> entre l’Isra\u00ebl que dirige le sionisme extr\u00e9miste, la direction politique am\u00e9ricaniste pourtant si compl\u00e8tement acquise aux int\u00e9r\u00eats de cet Isra\u00ebl-l\u00e0, et, au-del\u00e0, la situation g\u00e9n\u00e9rale de la direction du bloc BAO. Chemi Shalev, de Haaretz<\/em>, qu’on va citer pour un autre article, pr\u00e9sente rapidement (le 21 janvier 2012<\/a>) l’incident qui provoque des remous consid\u00e9rables. Il s’agit bien d’une des options pr\u00e9sent\u00e9es par Adler pour qu’Isra\u00ebl se d\u00e9barrasse de cette menace existentielle (vocabulaire approuv\u00e9 par le Syst\u00e8me) qu’est la menace nucl\u00e9aire iranienne. La troisi\u00e8me option est que Netanyahou forme une \u00e9quipe de tueurs avec pour mission d’abattre (physiquement et mortellement) le pr\u00e9sident Obama<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00abThe owner and publisher of the Atlanta Jewish Times, Andrew Adler, has suggested that Israeli Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu consider ordering a Mossad hit team to assassinate U.S. President Barack Obama so that his successor will defend Israel against Iran.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbAdler, who has since apologized for his article, listed three options for Israel to counter Iran’s nuclear weapons in an article published in his newspaper last Friday. The first is to launch a pre-emptive strike against Hamas and Hezbollah, the second is to attack Iran’s nuclear facilities and the third is to give the go-ahead for U.S.-based Mossad agents to take out a president deemed unfriendly to Israel in order for the current vice president to take his place and forcefully dictate that the United States’ policy includes its helping the Jewish state obliterate its enemies.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbAdler goes on to write: Yes, you read three correctly. Order a hit on a president in order to preserve Israel’s existence. Think about it. If have thought of this Tom-Clancy-type scenario, don’t you think that this almost unfathomable idea has been discussed in Israel’s most inner circles?<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tAdler s’est r\u00e9tract\u00e9 (?) apr\u00e8s avoir \u00e9crit ce qu’il a \u00e9crit, d’ailleurs sermonn\u00e9 par l’une ou l’autre autorit\u00e9 pro-isra\u00e9lienne aux USA, notamment le directeur de l’American Jewish Committee d’Atlanta Dov Wilker, et le directeur national de l’Anti-Defamation League, Abraham Foxman. Sa r\u00e9tractation vaut \u00e0 peu pr\u00e8s le d\u00e9menti de Netanyahou (le 19 janvier 2012<\/a>) d’avoir, selon Steve Linde du Jerusalem Post<\/em>, trait\u00e9 les quotidiens Haaretz<\/em> et New York Times<\/em> de pires ennemis d’Isra\u00ebl<\/a> (\u00abNetanyahu said, You know, Steve, we have two main enemies’. And I thought he was going to talk about, you know, Iran, maybe Hamas. He said, It’s The New York Times and Haaretz.’ He said, They set the agenda for an anti-Israel campaign all over the world. Journalists read them every morning and base their news stories on what they read in The New York Times and Haaretz.’ <\/em>\u00bb) La r\u00e9tractation de Linde nous confirme plut\u00f4t la chose : \u00abThe PMO<\/em> [Prime Minister Office<\/em>] asked Linde to publish a clarification, which he did, stating that his remarks at the Tel Aviv conference were his own analysis of the conversation with the prime minister.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tPar ailleurs, et pour montrer combien la r\u00e9tractation d’Adler est douteuse, le m\u00eame Chemi Shalev, du Haaretz<\/em>, publie un autre article, le m\u00eame 21 janvier 2912<\/a>. Il y observe en substance qu’Adler est peut-\u00eatre un idiot (d’avoir publi\u00e9 la chose ?) mais que son id\u00e9e est partag\u00e9e par un grand nombre de personnes<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbAnd while we might all stipulate that there is no Jew anywhere in the world who is currently contemplating any act of violence against President Obama, I know, and most of you know, that Adler’s crazy and criminal suggestions are not the ranting of some loony-tune individual and were not taken out of thin air – but are the inevitable result of the inordinate volume of repugnant venom that some of Obama’s political rivals, Jews and non-Jews included, have been spewing for the last three years.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbAnyone who has spent any time talking to some of the more vociferous detractors of Obama, Jewish or otherwise, has inevitably encountered those nasty nutters, and they are many, who still believe he is a Muslim, who are utterly convinced that he wants to destroy Israel, and who seriously debate whether he is more like Ahmadinejad than Arafat or and I heard this one with my own ears more like Hitler than Haman.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbAnyone who reads some of the opinion articles and blogs posted on the Internet by the more extreme Obama-hating writers and pundits again, many of them Jews – cannot deny the wanton and inflammatory nature of much of their anti-Obama invective.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbAnd anyone who lived through the Israeli right-wing’s days of rage against Rabin and the Oslo Accords can never forget that this deluge of deadly toxins need trigger just one homicidal chemical reaction in just one fanatic brain for history to be changed forever.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tL’affaire est l’occasion pour Robert Parry, de ConsortiumNews<\/em>, de mettre en perspective, le 21 janvier 2012<\/a>, cet appel au meurtre d’Obama et, d’une fa\u00e7on plus g\u00e9n\u00e9rale, les interf\u00e9rences grossi\u00e8res des Isra\u00e9liens et des pro-isra\u00e9liens dans la direction politique am\u00e9ricaniste et, plus pr\u00e9cis\u00e9ment, dans le processus d’\u00e9lection des pr\u00e9sidents. Dans l’extrait ci-dessus, Parry introduit l’affaire de la d\u00e9faite de Jimmy Carter en 1980, obtenue gr\u00e2ce \u00e0 une intrigue commune des r\u00e9publicains et du Mossad<\/em> avec l’Iran de l’Ayatollah Khomeiny, largement \u00e0 l’initiative des r\u00e9publicains qui voulaient faire \u00e9lire Ronald Reagan (ce qui fut fait). Parry est certainement celui qui a le mieux d\u00e9cortiqu\u00e9 cette affaires, beyond raisonnable doubt<\/em> Auparavant, il rappelle combien l’\u00e9lection de 2012 est marqu\u00e9e par ces interf\u00e9rences, Gingrich<\/a> \u00e9tant sans aucun doute un candidat (r\u00e9publicain) des int\u00e9r\u00eats sionistes extr\u00e9mistes.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00abThough Adler’s remarks about employing what is sometimes called executive action to alter U.S. government policy toward Israel is surely outrageous, there has existed for several decades a more general perspective in some quarters that U.S. policy must move in accord with Israel’s desires and that any action deemed anti-Israel must be made politically unacceptable.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbU.S. neoconservatives, for instance, have argued that there should be no space between how Israel and the United States view security concerns in the Middle East. Many neocons favored invading Iraq in 2003 because it was a longtime enemy of Israel and many now call for attacking Iran because Israeli leaders claim its potential acquisition of a nuclear weapon represents an existential threat.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbIn Campaign 2012, leading Republican presidential candidates have denounced Obama for allowing even a slight separation to occur in America’s shoulder-to-shoulder support for Israel. Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich has gone so far as to suggest that he would join Netanyahu in a full-scale invasion of Iran to achieve regime change if that was what the Israeli prime minister wanted.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbAnd the notion of Israel participating in efforts to change American political leadership is not as far-fetched as it might seem. There is extensive evidence that Likud Prime Minister Menachem Begin intervened covertly more than three decades ago to undermine President Jimmy Carter’s reelection hopes because Begin feared that Carter would push Israel into accepting a Palestinian state<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tLe climat psychologique entre Isra\u00ebl et les USA, au niveau des directions politiques et des groupes de pression, est d’une tension extraordinaire. Lorsque nous observions<\/a> qu’elle est plus forte qu’entre les deux alli\u00e9s et l’Iran, ce n’est pas simple ironie. Alors que le Congr\u00e8s lui-m\u00eame, malgr\u00e9 son pavlovisme pro-isra\u00e9lien grassement r\u00e9mun\u00e9r\u00e9, s’inqui\u00e8te<\/a> d’une guerre contre l’Iran, dont il ne veut pas, les partisans les plus acharn\u00e9s d’Isra\u00ebl-Netanyahou, c’est-\u00e0-dire partageant l’obsession maniaque de Netanyahou, en arrivent \u00e0 des extr\u00e9mit\u00e9s \u00e9galement extraordinaires. Dans sa chronique du 20 janvier 2012<\/a>, Justin Raimondo, cite un nomm\u00e9 Josh Block du Progressive Policy Institute (\u00abthere is no room for uncivil discourse or name calling, like Israel Firster or Likudnik’, and policy or political rhetoric that is hostile to Israel, or suggests that Iran has no nuclear weapons program,<\/em> [] in the mainstream Democratic party discourse<\/em>\u00bb) ; d’o\u00f9 Raimondo d\u00e9duit qu’affirmer la possibilit\u00e9 que l’Iran n’ait pas de programme militaire nucl\u00e9aire constitue une affirmation antis\u00e9mite : \u00abSo let’s get this straight: there is no room among those engaging in civil discourse to in any way cast doubt on the proposition that Iran has an active nuclear weapons program: to even suggest such a thing is prima facie proof of anti-Semitism.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tTout cela s’accorde avec ce qu’on sait des relations de Netanyahou et d’Obama, de la position de Netanyahou tenant Haaretz<\/em> et le New York Times<\/em> comme les pires ennemis d’Isra\u00ebl parce que les deux journaux ne partagent pas tout \u00e0 fait sa propre position obsessionnelle et maniaque sur la question iranienne et sur le reste. Dans ce cadre psychologique absolument d\u00e9cha\u00een\u00e9, l’intervention d’Andrew Adler, du Jewish Times<\/em> d’Atlanta, n’est pas si folle qu’elle ne para\u00eet, ou bien n’est folle que dans le cadre d’une pathologie psychologique collective qu’on peut rapidement d\u00e9crire comme confinant \u00e0 la folie, o\u00f9 le Premier ministre isra\u00e9lien est en tr\u00e8s bonne place. Il n’est donc nullement impossible que la suggestion d’Adler, qui laisse tout de m\u00eame le choix de leurs armes aux tueurs, corresponde au moins \u00e0 un vu secret, sinon, disons, \u00e0 une suggestion de communication, sinon \u00e0 la description d’une menace qui pourrait \u00eatre fond\u00e9e. Il est possible, selon nombre de circonstances, qu’Andrew Adler, dont l’obscurit\u00e9 n’a nullement emp\u00each\u00e9 l’abondance des commentaires \u00e0 propos de son \u00e9crit, soit pris au s\u00e9rieux, non seulement du c\u00f4t\u00e9 isra\u00e9lien, mais du c\u00f4t\u00e9 US, du c\u00f4t\u00e9 du pr\u00e9sident Obama, comme le porteur de circonstance d’un message d’une menace sinon r\u00e9elle, du moins de la plus s\u00e9rieuse des intimidations<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tIl faut alors replacer cela dans le contexte \u00e9lectoral, notamment \u00e0 la lumi\u00e8re de ce qu’\u00e9crit Parry, qui fut r\u00e9ellement un exemple fondamental d’interf\u00e9rence isra\u00e9lienne dans la politique int\u00e9rieure US. (Mais pas seulement isra\u00e9lienne, iranienne \u00e9galement ; plut\u00f4t que voir l’influence juive-sioniste \u00e9crasante \u00e0 Washington comme un \u00e9v\u00e9nement unique et exceptionnel, il faut voir que le syst\u00e8me politique US, par son absence totale<\/strong> de dimension r\u00e9galienne et historique, est absolument p\u00e9n\u00e9trable, donc continuellement \u00e0 vendre, y compris \u00e0 des int\u00e9r\u00eats \u00e9trangers ; certes, il y a le lobby sioniste, ou lobby juif, mais l’on pourrait aussi parler du lobby chinois, du temps des chinois nationalistes, jusqu’\u00e0 la fin des ann\u00e9es 1980 : dans les ann\u00e9es 1940, du temps de madame Tchang Ka\u00ef-check et du g\u00e9n\u00e9ral Claire Chennault, il \u00e9tait bien plus puissant que n’importe quel autre lobby.) Cela signifie que cette menace de mort contre Obama, prof\u00e9r\u00e9e par l’idiot de circonstance Adler, n’est pas un facteur accidentel ni n\u00e9gligeable, nullement une aberration, que c’est un facteur r\u00e9el, de poids, et cela dans la campagne \u00e9lectorale<\/strong> US elle-m\u00eame, avec des cons\u00e9quences sur les candidats, sur les politiques, sur les \u00e9lecteurs, et peut-\u00eatre comme source d’\u00e9v\u00e8nements dramatiques. Car monsieur Adler n’est pas loin d’exprimer le sentiment \u00e0 peine secret de Netanyahou, qui peut para\u00eetre surr\u00e9aliste quand on conna\u00eet la politique isra\u00e9lienne de BHO, mais qui est<\/strong> telle, sans aucun doute : une r\u00e9\u00e9lection d’Obama serait pour lui (Netanyahou), selon son analyse et sa psychologie, une catastrophe (O\u00f9 l’on voit, certes, que le facteur de d\u00e9stabilisation potentielle dont nous parlons<\/a> pour la campagne r\u00e9publicaine vaut pour toute la campagne pr\u00e9sidentielle de 2012.)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

\tMis en ligne le 23 janvier 2012 \u00e0 04H58<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Un commentaire du 13 janvier d’une personne (Andrew Adler) qui est pr\u00e9sent\u00e9e comme l’obscur \u00e9diteur et directeur d’un tout aussi obscur Jewish Times d’Atlanta, secoue diablement les relations r\u00e9elles entre l’Isra\u00ebl que dirige le sionisme extr\u00e9miste, la direction politique am\u00e9ricaniste pourtant si compl\u00e8tement acquise aux int\u00e9r\u00eats de cet Isra\u00ebl-l\u00e0, et, au-del\u00e0, la situation g\u00e9n\u00e9rale de… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[8881,7928,5205,12498,6120,3643,2773,2790,6208,4464,4134],"class_list":["post-74441","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-8881","tag-7928","tag-adler","tag-andrew","tag-campagne","tag-carter","tag-iran","tag-netanyahou","tag-obama","tag-parry","tag-presidentielle"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/74441","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=74441"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/74441\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=74441"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=74441"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=74441"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}