{"id":74458,"date":"2012-01-28T05:46:42","date_gmt":"2012-01-28T05:46:42","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2012\/01\/28\/lembargo-iranien-vers-lue-des-la-semaine-prochaine\/"},"modified":"2012-01-28T05:46:42","modified_gmt":"2012-01-28T05:46:42","slug":"lembargo-iranien-vers-lue-des-la-semaine-prochaine","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2012\/01\/28\/lembargo-iranien-vers-lue-des-la-semaine-prochaine\/","title":{"rendered":"L&rsquo;\u201cembargo\u201d iranien vers l&rsquo;UE d\u00e8s la semaine prochaine ?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><h4>L&#8217;embargo iranien vers l&rsquo;UE d\u00e8s la semaine prochaine ?<\/h4>\n<p>Il semble donc que nous soyons dans cette situation abracadabrantesque o\u00f9 chacun \u00e0 son propre embargo, qui est le m\u00eame mais qui a des cons\u00e9quences bien diff\u00e9rentes. Comme on <a href=\"http:\/\/www.dedefensa.org\/article-qui_tient_qui_avec_l_embargo_l_iran_ou_l_ue__27_01_2012.html\" class=\"gen\">l&rsquo;a vu<\/a>, \u00e0 l&#8217;embargo de l&rsquo;UE sur le p\u00e9trole iranien <strong>dans six mois<\/strong> (type Messieurs les Iraniens, laissez-nous le temps de nous organiser pour \u00e9viter les cons\u00e9quences f\u00e2cheuses pour nous de la mesure que nous avons d\u00e9cid\u00e9e contre vous), r\u00e9pond un projet d&#8217;embargo de l&rsquo;Iran sur son propre p\u00e9trole \u00e0 destination de l&rsquo;UE <strong>d\u00e8s que possible<\/strong> (type Messieurs les Europ\u00e9ens, avant de go\u00fbter les cons\u00e9quences heureuses de la mesure que vous avez prise contre nous, appr\u00e9ciez-en l&rsquo;amertume imm\u00e9diatement). Selon les derniers prolongements de la situation \u00e0 T\u00e9h\u00e9ran hier, il semblerait que ce projet, d\u00e9battu par le Parlement, d\u00e9bouche d\u00e8s dimanche sur une proposition d&rsquo;action d\u00e8s la semaine prochaine.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tDonc, ce <a href=\"http:\/\/www.presstv.ir\/detail\/223395.html\" class=\"gen\">27 janvier 2012<\/a>, <em>PressTV.com<\/em> publie un texte sur les intentions chronologiques du Parlement iranien \u00e0 cet \u00e9gard. Le texte rappelle que l&rsquo;UE est le deuxi\u00e8me exportateur de p\u00e9trole iranien, avec 18% de ce p\u00e9trole pour le premier semestre de 2011, selon l&rsquo;Energy Information Administration US (20% vers la Chine, premier exportateur).<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00ab<em>Deputy head of the Majlis National Security and Foreign Policy Committee Hossein Ebrahimi said on Friday that Iranian lawmakers would debate a double-urgency bill on Sunday which calls for the ban of oil exports to Europe as early as next week.<\/em> [] <em>The Majlis motion would deny Europe the six-month phase-in period that the bloc has considered to adjust and find alternative sources to Iran&rsquo;s crude.<\/em> <\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>The recent EU sanctions on Iranian oil are merely a psychological warfare, as the 27-member bloc is delaying the implementation of the embargoes under various pretexts, Ebrahimi added. Europe is uncertain about enforcing these sanctions and seeks to project<\/em> [<em>its own woes<\/em>] <em>and manipulate public opinion, the lawmaker said.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>\n<p class=\"signature\"><em>dedefensa.org<\/em><\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>L&#8217;embargo iranien vers l&rsquo;UE d\u00e8s la semaine prochaine ? Il semble donc que nous soyons dans cette situation abracadabrantesque o\u00f9 chacun \u00e0 son propre embargo, qui est le m\u00eame mais qui a des cons\u00e9quences bien diff\u00e9rentes. Comme on l&rsquo;a vu, \u00e0 l&#8217;embargo de l&rsquo;UE sur le p\u00e9trole iranien dans six mois (type Messieurs les Iraniens,&hellip;&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[14],"tags":[1140,2773,3600,2609],"class_list":["post-74458","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-ouverture-libre","tag-embargo","tag-iran","tag-petrole","tag-ue"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/74458","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=74458"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/74458\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=74458"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=74458"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=74458"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}