{"id":74461,"date":"2012-01-30T06:01:13","date_gmt":"2012-01-30T06:01:13","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2012\/01\/30\/anonymous-confirme-et-amplifie-les-fonctions-de-stratfor\/"},"modified":"2012-01-30T06:01:13","modified_gmt":"2012-01-30T06:01:13","slug":"anonymous-confirme-et-amplifie-les-fonctions-de-stratfor","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2012\/01\/30\/anonymous-confirme-et-amplifie-les-fonctions-de-stratfor\/","title":{"rendered":"Anonymous<\/em> confirme et amplifie les fonctions de STRATFOR<\/em>"},"content":{"rendered":"

Des documents sous forme de masses consid\u00e9rables de messages \u00e9lectroniques tomb\u00e9s dans les mains d’Anonymous<\/em> lors de l’attaque de la soci\u00e9t\u00e9 de renseignement et d’analyse strat\u00e9gique STRATFOR<\/em>, en d\u00e9cembre<\/a> dernier<\/a>, montrent un r\u00f4le actif de STTRATFOR<\/em> dans des op\u00e9rations d’infiltration du mouvement Occupy<\/em>, en coop\u00e9ration avec le service DPS (Department of Public Safety), qui est une sorte de service de renseignement et de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 de l’Etat du Texas. C’est Russia Today<\/em>, tr\u00e8s actif dans l’information de l’activisme antiSyst\u00e8me dans la cyberguerre, qui donne des d\u00e9tails sur cette affaire, le 27 janvier 2012<\/a>.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00abIn some of the latest pieces of correspondence made public, however, information that many had already suspected about the role law enforcement played in infiltrating the Occupy Wall Street movement is brought to light. In an exchange of emails between Stratfor executives that has been published by hackers involved in the matter, employees of the firm go back-and-forth with one another in detail over information that Texas law enforcement supplied the firm after investigating an Austin Occupy meet-up.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbIn the emails, Strafor employees discuss intel about the Occupy movement that was supplied to them by a Texas DPS agent, or an officer within the ranks of the Lone Star State’s Department of Public Safety. The DPS is a state-wide law enforcement agency that investigates suspicious activity and allegations of terrorism within Texas. The question of why state law enforcement shared that email with a private intelligence firm is open to interpretation, but certainly suggests that attempts to understand and perhaps undermine the local OWS chapter was more than just a minor operation.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbAccording to the documentation, which includes correspondence from late 2011, Stratfor employees discuss both Occupy Austin and the Deep Green Resistance, or DGR. While DGR is not directly affiliated with Occupy Wall Street, it is a similar movement to a degree that encourages environmental activism that isn’t present in more mainstream campaigns. In a press release, the DGR attacks both Texas authorities and Strafor for their newly revealed roles.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbDeep Green Resistance condemns the surveillance and infiltration of activist groups by law enforcement and private corporations and calls on activists and their allies to expose and protest this violation of all of our constitutional rights, the group says in a statement published Thursday. Rachel Meeropol, a staff attorney at the Center for Constitutional Rights, adds that she is outraged over how Stratfor and the DPS were in cahoots over infiltrating Occupy Austin. Law enforcement sharing information about local activism with private intelligence firms should be a huge scandal, writes Meeropol in Thursday’s statement. Privately funded surveillance and infiltration of activist groups is especially chilling, as time and again we see such corporations operate as if they are above the law and accountable to no one.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbIn the emails, Stratfor staffers discuss how one of their own men went undercover to an Occupy Austin General Assembly and attempted to gain insight into how the group operates. Stratfor’s Scott Stewart writes that the movement is considered by some to be a terrible threat to corporations, but adds, in reality, due to the history of anarchists, animal rights, anti-war and anti-globalization protesters, companies are well prepared for such hippy hijinks. As the Occupy movement continues to thrive more than three months after Stewart shared such words with other Stratfor employees, it is clear that that isn’t the case.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbIn a separate email sent a month later in November, Korena Zucha of Stratfor writes that a Texas DPS agent has shared information about both movements. In it, Deep Green is linked with Occupy Austin, which DGR shrugs off as speculation. Representatives for DGR believe that the correspondence suggests that surveillance of both groups was ongoing.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbIn the back-and-forth, Stratfor staffers suggest that sources within Occupy Austin describe some of the DGR members as crazy, to which one adds, that bothers me, because these Occupy people will tolerate just about anything. Stratfor’s Marc Lanthemann, who signs his email as a Watch Officer for the firm, suggests that coordination between the DGR and Occupy movement could have dire consequences. Lanthemann writes in one email that he thinks Deep Green is an eco-terror group is focused on creating a situation where violent confrontation will be the ultimate outcome. It doesn’t require an agent to get simple facts correct. Both of these assertions are just plain false, responds DGR.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tCette mise \u00e0 la disposition du public de diverses correspondances de STRATFOR<\/em> (celles-ci, en attendant d’autres) \u00e9claire d’un jour nouveau les activit\u00e9s du groupe. On d\u00e9couvre, sans surprise mais comme une nouveaut\u00e9 int\u00e9ressante et inattendue, une dimension nouvelle de ses activit\u00e9s, dans le cadre de la coop\u00e9ration suivie et constante, et g\u00e9n\u00e9tiquement \u00e9vidente, de cette organisation frontiste (STRATFOR<\/em>) de la n\u00e9buleuse de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 nationale du syst\u00e8me de l’am\u00e9ricanisme, avec divers organismes de cette n\u00e9buleuse. Jusqu’alors, on jugeait que STRATFOR<\/em> \u00e9tait essentiellement un organisme frontiste d’analyse strat\u00e9gique, dont la t\u00e2che \u00e9tait de diffuser dans le monde le point de vue am\u00e9ricaniste, sous la vernis d’une apparente position d’ind\u00e9pendance avec, para\u00eet-il, le jugement et l’esprit \u00e0 mesure. L’aspect remarquable de cette entreprise, de ce point de vue, est que nombre de lecteurs de STRATFOR<\/em> y croyaient et croient encore \u00e0 cette ind\u00e9pendance, d’ailleurs par vu de croyance, un peu comme l’on parle du vu de chastet\u00e9 ; cela, c’est une bonne mesure de la capacit\u00e9 d’infection psychologique de ce ph\u00e9nom\u00e8ne g\u00e9n\u00e9ral embrass\u00e9 par l’expression American Dream<\/em>, qui embrasse les vertus suppos\u00e9es et sans fin du mod\u00e8le am\u00e9ricain, en fait, comme v\u00e9hicule et arch\u00e9type repr\u00e9sentatif de la pression g\u00e9n\u00e9rale d’influence psychologique du Syst\u00e8me.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tLes courriers \u00e9lectroniques mis \u00e0 jour par Anonymous<\/em> nous montrent donc une dimension nouvelle de la coop\u00e9ration de cette organisation frontiste avec les centres de pouvoir dont elle d\u00e9pend en r\u00e9alit\u00e9. C’est tout de m\u00eame une surprise, comme nous le remarquions, car si l’on faisait de STRATFOR<\/em> une shadow CIA<\/em> (et plut\u00f4t, selon notre jugement, une shadow DIA<\/em>), on pensait que cette duplication ne concernait que le domaine chic et noble de l’analyse strat\u00e9gique. On d\u00e9couvre donc que ce r\u00f4le s’\u00e9tend aux op\u00e9rations ponctuelles de p\u00e9n\u00e9tration et d’espionnage actif qui ont plus mauvaise r\u00e9putation, dans lesquelles STRATFOR<\/em> ne d\u00e9daigne pas de jouer un r\u00f4le tr\u00e8s actif de suppl\u00e9tif, et jusqu’\u00e0 prendre des initiatives. STRATFOR<\/em> est donc aussi bien proche des analystes des services de renseignement officiels du Syst\u00e8me que des services op\u00e9rationnels, charg\u00e9s de missions s’apparentant \u00e0 de l’espionnage actif, voire \u00e0 des implications op\u00e9rationnelles proches des activit\u00e9s des forces sp\u00e9ciales (les fameux sales coups, ou dirty tricks<\/em> caract\u00e9risant les activit\u00e9s subversives clandestines de ce type de service). En ce sens, STRATFOR<\/em> se rapproche des soci\u00e9t\u00e9s de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 priv\u00e9es du bloc BAO, surtout am\u00e9ricanistes, qui fournissent aux forces arm\u00e9es et \u00e0 leurs divers composants subversifs des suppl\u00e9tifs type mercenaires au statut priv\u00e9.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tQu’il s’agisse dans ce cas de la DPS, sorte de CIA-FBI du Texas, plut\u00f4t que de la CIA, n’importe pas sinon pour noter que STRATFOR<\/em> a un sens aiguis\u00e9 de la structure d\u00e9centralis\u00e9e des USA, et que cette soci\u00e9t\u00e9 ne d\u00e9daigne certainement pas de servir d’auxiliaire des autorit\u00e9s de l’Etat de l’Union d’o\u00f9 elle op\u00e8re, ce qui lui permet d’assurer sa position commerciale puisque son si\u00e8ge est au Texas. De m\u00eame, d’apr\u00e8s les teneurs des messages, il semble \u00e9vident que STRATFOR<\/em> joue \u00e9galement un r\u00f4le de suppl\u00e9tif, qui peut \u00e9galement aller jusqu’\u00e0 l’op\u00e9rationnalit\u00e9 subversive, aupr\u00e8s du corporate power<\/em> lui-m\u00eame. Il s’agit l\u00e0 du sch\u00e9ma complet de privatisation des affaires de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 et de l’extension du complexe militaro-industriel vers une infinit\u00e9 de branches du secteur priv\u00e9. Non seulement STRATFOR<\/em> ne nous d\u00e9\u00e7oit pas mais il ne cesse de nous exposer l’\u00e9tendu de ses engagements comme serviteur du Syst\u00e8me, et combien les affaires de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 nationale englobent d\u00e9sormais tous les domaines de la r\u00e9flexion et de l’action, jusqu’aux plus douteux, jusqu’\u00e0 ceux qui s’apparentent aux pratiques de l’ill\u00e9galit\u00e9 institu\u00e9e, selon le mod\u00e8le du crime organis\u00e9.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

\tMis en ligne le 30 janvier 2012 \u00e0 06H02<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Des documents sous forme de masses consid\u00e9rables de messages \u00e9lectroniques tomb\u00e9s dans les mains d’Anonymous lors de l’attaque de la soci\u00e9t\u00e9 de renseignement et d’analyse strat\u00e9gique STRATFOR, en d\u00e9cembre dernier, montrent un r\u00f4le actif de STTRATFOR dans des op\u00e9rations d’infiltration du mouvement Occupy, en coop\u00e9ration avec le service DPS (Department of Public Safety), qui est… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[10494,3568,8271,14596,1268,7460,9002,9426,11493,7459,3571,6326,6688,7975,3160,14597],"class_list":["post-74461","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-anonymous","tag-corporate","tag-cyberguerre","tag-dirty","tag-friedman","tag-frontiste","tag-illegalite","tag-infiltration","tag-occupy","tag-organisation","tag-power","tag-privatisation","tag-prive","tag-secteur","tag-stratfor","tag-tricks"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/74461","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=74461"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/74461\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=74461"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=74461"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=74461"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}