{"id":74462,"date":"2012-01-30T06:26:23","date_gmt":"2012-01-30T06:26:23","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2012\/01\/30\/rappel-utile-de-lhistoire-du-nucleaire-iranien-par-robert-fisk\/"},"modified":"2012-01-30T06:26:23","modified_gmt":"2012-01-30T06:26:23","slug":"rappel-utile-de-lhistoire-du-nucleaire-iranien-par-robert-fisk","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2012\/01\/30\/rappel-utile-de-lhistoire-du-nucleaire-iranien-par-robert-fisk\/","title":{"rendered":"Rappel utile de l&rsquo;histoire du nucl\u00e9aire iranien, par Robert Fisk"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><h4>Rappel utile de l&rsquo;histoire du nucl\u00e9aire iranien, par Robert Fisk<\/h4>\n<p>Dans un article du <a href=\"http:\/\/www.independent.co.uk\/opinion\/commentators\/fisk\/robert-fisk-weve-been-here-before--and-it-suits-israel-that-we-never-forget-nuclear-iran-6294111.html\" class=\"gen\">25 janvier 2012<\/a>, dans <em>The Independent<\/em>, Robert Fisk prend la question de la crise iranienne sous l&rsquo;angle de l&rsquo;historique du programme nucl\u00e9aire iranien depuis ses origines. (Lesquelles remontent au Shah, et furent accueillies, \u00e0 l&rsquo;\u00e9poque, par un concert d&rsquo;encouragements \u00e9logieux par les principaux t\u00e9nors de l&rsquo;actuel bloc BAO.) Fisk, de moins en moins indulgent avec Isra\u00ebl comme il le fut parfois en d&rsquo;autres occasions, met en \u00e9vidence la constance de l&rsquo;obsession iranienne d&rsquo;Isra\u00ebl, et la constance non moins grande du mensonge isra\u00e9lien \u00e0 cet \u00e9gard.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tAvec des nuances tenant aux circonstances et aux diversit\u00e9s des engagements, on d\u00e9couvre, ou l&rsquo;on a la m\u00e9moire rafra\u00eechie \u00e0 cet \u00e9gard, que le bloc BAO et les Anglo-Saxons ont dans cette affaire la m\u00eame responsabilit\u00e9 de cr\u00e9ateurs du soi-disant monstre  qu&rsquo;ils d\u00e9noncent, qu&rsquo;ils eurent dans le cas d&rsquo;al Qa\u00efda et du mouvement islamiste extr\u00e9miste en Afghanistan et ailleurs. (Voir <a href=\"http:\/\/www.dedefensa.org\/article-les_origines_du_desordre_present_par_brzezinski_en_janvier_1998_31_07_2005.html\" class=\"gen\">Brzezinski<\/a> en 1998.) Bien,  rien de bien nouveau ; de quelque c\u00f4t\u00e9 que l&rsquo;on se tourne, vers toutes les crises et les points de tension, le Syst\u00e8me est la source de tout, la cause premi\u00e8re et la cause centrale.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tUn extrait chronologique et significatif du texte de Fisk<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00ab<em>Let&rsquo;s take the Israeli version which, despite constant proof that Israel&rsquo;s intelligence services are about as efficient as Syria&rsquo;s, goes on being trumpeted by its friends in the West, none more subservient than Western journalists. The Israeli President warns us now that Iran is on the cusp of producing a nuclear weapon. Heaven preserve us. Yet we reporters do not mention that Shimon Peres, as Israeli Prime Minister, said exactly the same thing in 1996. That was 16 years ago. And we do not recall that the current Israeli PM, Benjamin Netanyahu, said in 1992 that Iran would have a nuclear bomb by 1999. That would be 13 years ago. Same old story.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>In fact, we don&rsquo;t know that Iran really is building a nuclear weapon. And after Iraq, it&rsquo;s amazing that the old weapons of mass destruction details are popping with the same frequency as all the poppycock about Saddam&rsquo;s titanic arsenal. Not to mention the date problem. When did all this start? The Shah. The old boy wanted nuclear power. He even said he wanted a bomb because \u00ab\u00a0the US and the Soviet Union had nuclear bombs\u00a0\u00bb and no one objected. Europeans rushed to supply the dictator&rsquo;s wish. Siemens  not Russia  built the Bushehr nuclear facility.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>And when Ayatollah Khomeini, Scourge of the West, Apostle of Shia Revolution, etc, took over Iran in 1979, he ordered the entire nuclear project to be closed down because it was \u00ab\u00a0the work of the Devil\u00a0\u00bb. Only when Saddam invaded Iran  with our Western encouragement  and started using poison gas against the Iranians (chemical components arriving from the West, of course) was Khomeini persuaded to reopen it.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>All this has been deleted from the historical record; it was the black-turbaned mullahs who started the nuclear project, along with the crackpot Ahmadinejad. And Israel might have to destroy this terror-weapon to secure its own survival, to ensure the West&rsquo;s survival, for democracy, etc, etc.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>\n<p class=\"signature\"><em>dedefensa.org<\/em><\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Rappel utile de l&rsquo;histoire du nucl\u00e9aire iranien, par Robert Fisk Dans un article du 25 janvier 2012, dans The Independent, Robert Fisk prend la question de la crise iranienne sous l&rsquo;angle de l&rsquo;historique du programme nucl\u00e9aire iranien depuis ses origines. (Lesquelles remontent au Shah, et furent accueillies, \u00e0 l&rsquo;\u00e9poque, par un concert d&rsquo;encouragements \u00e9logieux par&hellip;&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[14],"tags":[3311,6751,2773,14598,13128,4636,3004,6767,3134,4460],"class_list":["post-74462","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-ouverture-libre","tag-fisk","tag-historique","tag-iran","tag-isael","tag-khomeini","tag-memoire","tag-nucleaire","tag-obsession","tag-robert","tag-shah"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/74462","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=74462"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/74462\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=74462"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=74462"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=74462"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}