\tRon Paul semblerait ne plus exister, si l’on suit la presse-Syst\u00e8me dans sa faible couverture des primaires r\u00e9publicaines. Cette faible couverture consiste \u00e0 annoncer depuis un mois, ou un mois et demi, ou deux ou trois mois qu’importe, que ces primaires sont achev\u00e9es, que Romney est le candidat d\u00e9sign\u00e9, ce que d\u00e9mentent par cons\u00e9quent le renouvellement r\u00e9gulier de cette affirmation comme s’il s’agissait d’une nouvelle, la confusion des d\u00e9comptes des d\u00e9l\u00e9gu\u00e9s, les changements de m\u00e9thodes de comptage des r\u00e9sultats. (Voir Fox.Newsw<\/em>, le 6 avril 2012<\/a>, sur l’\u00c9tat du le Dakota de Nord, o\u00f9 l’on appliquerait effectivement de nouvelles r\u00e8gles pour que Romney, arriv\u00e9 troisi\u00e8me, emporte la majorit\u00e9 des d\u00e9l\u00e9gu\u00e9s.) Bref, la confusion existe m\u00eame dans la fraude et le processus faussaire…<\/p>\n<\/p>\n \tLe ph\u00e9nom\u00e8ne de l’effacage complet de Ron Paul de la vie publique et des r\u00e9sultats des primaires est d’autant plus remarquable que le succ\u00e8s de foule de Ron Paul ne cesse de s’affirmer, de s’amplifier, de s’imposer comme un ph\u00e9nom\u00e8ne national \u00e0 la fois majeur et vrai<\/strong>, et pourtant totalement inexistant<\/strong>. C’en est au point o\u00f9 un chroniqueur du Washington Times<\/em>, Eric Golub, parle \u00e0 propos de Paul, de beatlemania<\/em>, confirmant ainsi le statut de rock star<\/em> de la politique du non-candidat, non-existant. (Le Washington Times<\/em>, de tendance conservatrice marqu\u00e9e, est l’un des rares quotidiens nationaux de la presse-Syst\u00e8me, sinon le seul, \u00e0 entretenir une certaine veille d’information sur Ron Paul. C’est notamment le cas au travers de deux ou trois journalistes et commentateurs de ce quotidien. Il faut signaler que Golub n’est pas un commentateur affichant une opinion pr\u00e9cise, mais un reporteur normal, rendant compte de la situation qu’il suit.)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n \tDonc, voici Golub, ce 5 avril 2012<\/a>, \u00e0 propos de Ron Paul parlant \u00e0 UCLA, l’universit\u00e9 de Californie, bastion classique et connu de la gauche contestatrice et extr\u00eame des \u00e9tudiants US (pour rappel, Ron Paul est en g\u00e9n\u00e9ral class\u00e9 \u00e0 l’extr\u00eame droite par l’emballage-Syst\u00e8me).<\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00abRon Paul spoke at UCLA last night, and several thousand people showed up to create a scene that made Beatlemania seem tame. No one would have guessed that this man is trailing in all the presidential race polls. From an event standpoint, the speech at UCLA was a complete success. Dr. Paul knows how to galvanize people. But during his fifty-or so minute speech, not one minute was spent talking about the presidential race, which leads to a very important question that must be asked.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00bbIf Dr. Paul can inspire such large, passionate crowds to hear him speak, why has he never won a single presidential contest?<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00bbThe lines were like those at a rock concert, stretching for long blocks of the campus to enter the Straus Stadium at the Los Angeles Tennis Center (LATC) where Dr. Paul was speaking. The campaign promoted the event as a Town Hall, not a campaign rally. The audience, estimated by the campaign at over 7,000, should give even the candidate’s most ardent critics pause. They there were mostly young and articulate. They had genuine concerns and well thought out ideas as to why change is necessary.<\/em> []<\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00bbIt still does not explain why he is soundly rejected in actual contests when votes are counted. Pointing this out is not meant to denigrate Dr. Paul. This is a serious issue. If the Paul supporters can find the weak link in their election chain and fix it, it would allow them to become a more serious movement in terms of votes.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00bbThe answer is obvious, although that election explanation is for another day. While Dr. Paul’s chances of winning the White House are dwindling, his star among the faithful is shining as bright as it ever has. It is one thing to dismiss gatherings of twenty students over pizza boxes. A crowd of several thousand people with empty seats few and far between must be respected.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00bbRon Paul has a clear following. In a lengthy and often quixotic campaign with ups and downs, his UCLA speech was clearly a high note. Young people are often ridiculed for chanting slogans such as his is what democracy looks like. Yet on this night, it actually was. Only hours before baseball season was to begin, Dr. Paul clearly hit a home run.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n \tCet \u00e9tat de chose est non pas paradoxal mais insupportable, intellectuellement et politiquement, pour ceux qui sont inform\u00e9s de la r\u00e9alit\u00e9 et jugent que c’est elle qui doit s’exprimer pour parvenir \u00e0 la v\u00e9rit\u00e9 de la situation politique, et non pas le montage virtualiste des forces-Syst\u00e8me, absolument grossier dans le cas de Ron Paul. Tout cela suscite chez l’un des soutiens ext\u00e9rieurs de Ron Paul les plus attentifs et les plus influents dans le monde dissident US, une ni\u00e8me tentative pour appeler le candidat r\u00e9publicain \u00e0 une r\u00e9action significative. Il s’agit de Justin Raimondo, qui est d\u00e9j\u00e0 intervenu \u00e0 au moins trois reprises de fa\u00e7on solennelle sur son site Antiwar.com<\/em> pour que Ron Paul abandonne le parti r\u00e9publicain et devienne un candidat ind\u00e9pendant. (Voir le 29 d\u00e9cembre 2011<\/a>, le 15 f\u00e9vrier 2012<\/a> et le 15 mars 2012<\/a>.)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n