For the conspiracy-minded in Beijing, and there are plenty of them, they will see these things as completing the circle of a US containment strategy designed to stifle China’s rise<\/em>\u00bb). Cet avis est d\u00e9velopp\u00e9 par le journaliste Francesco Sisci.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00abColumnist Francesco Sisci told RT that it was very possible that somebody tried to plant the scandal as a thorn between the US and China and that the blind activist must have had help to escape captivity. If it was orchestrated they must have had the support of the local police and maybe also someone in America, said Sisci. He emphasized that China-US relations were entering a tricky time with both sides adapting to China’s growing status as a global superpower.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n\tLa th\u00e8se inverse est soutenue par un professeur chinois de l’universit\u00e9 de Bristiol, Zhang Yongjin, interrog\u00e9 par le m\u00eame RT. \u00abGiven the high stakes in the strategic and economic dialogue that was to be held in Beijing just before the \u00e9vent<\/em> [Cheng seeking shelter in the US embassy after escaping house arrest<\/em>], I don’t believe this was a conspiracy,he said.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00bbBut while viewing the timing of the event as a coincidence, Zhang says the Americans probably didn’t play this very smartly by agreeing to take Chen into their compound. On the surface, this is sort of an embarrassment for the Chinese. But when Chen Guangcheng came out and said he was disappointed by how the Americans had dealt with this, it became an embarrassment now more for the United States than for China really,\u00a0\u00bb he added. Zhang also says that Beijing’s low profile and relative reticence regarding the case proves China is not going to let it get in the way of more important matters.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n\tUne autre th\u00e8se est que l’affaire profite essentiellement \u00e0 l’opposition US contre l’administration Obama, essentiellement Romney le candidat officiel du parti r\u00e9publicain. <\/p>\n<\/p>\n
\t\u00abUS President Barack Obama’s opposition has also seized on Chen’s case, branding it as indicative of his weak foreign policy. bama’s Republican presidential competitor Mitt Romney has branded the administration’s treatment of Chen Guangcheng’s case as a failure. The reports are, if they are accurate, that our administration wittingly or unwittingly communicated to Chen an implicit threat to his family and also probably sped up or may have sped up the process of his decision to leave the embassy,\u00a0\u00bb Romney said at a campaign event on Thursday. He added that if reports were true, it’s a day of shame for the Obama administration.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n\tDans ce dernier cas, les hypoth\u00e8ses complotistes prennent une autre allure et rencontrent un courant assez naturel, o\u00f9 le complot c\u00f4toie presque intimement les coutumes naturelles de notre \u00e9poque postmodernistes. Dans ce cas, le complot a tendance \u00e0 se marier finalement avec une forme nouvelle, devenue normale, des relations internationales, fond\u00e9e sur le moralisme comme th\u00e8me universaliste, sans le moindre respect pour la souverainet\u00e9, et repr\u00e9sentant par cons\u00e9quent une force naturelle (selon les conceptions postmodernistes) et naturellement active, sinon activiste, contre les \u00c9tats souverains. Il suffit alors d’orienter cette force toujours en action dans un sens pr\u00e9m\u00e9dit\u00e9 pour obtenir un effet politique int\u00e9ressant.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
\tEffectivement, le r\u00e9publicain Mitt Romney a constitu\u00e9 une \u00e9quipe de politique de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 nationale tr\u00e8s fortement influenc\u00e9e et manipul\u00e9e par les n\u00e9oconservateurs, adversaires acharn\u00e9s des diverses puissances ext\u00e9rieures qui peuvent entraver l’affirmation de puissance des USA vue selon l’axe fait avec Isra\u00ebl ; parmi ces puissances, il y a bien entendu la Chine. D’autre part, ces m\u00eames neocons<\/em> sont les ma\u00eetres de l’influence subversive, par la manipulation du soft power<\/em>, des instituts \u00e0 extension internationale, des organisations dites non gouvernementales et autres moyens d’action bas\u00e9s sur le cat\u00e9chisme humanitariste, etc. Ils ont ainsi jou\u00e9 un r\u00f4le important dans les r\u00e9volutions de couleur d’Europe de l’Est et au-del\u00e0 en 2002-2005, en manipulant ces divers moyens de d\u00e9stabilisation, d’ailleurs soutenus dans ce cas par les autorit\u00e9s US (particuli\u00e8rement le d\u00e9partement d’Etat) et divers canaux priv\u00e9s regroup\u00e9s autour de l’un et l’autre milliardaires (de Murdoch \u00e0 Soros, disons). Il est bien entendu concevable que l’affaire Cheng ait \u00e9t\u00e9 en bonne partie activ\u00e9e par cette sorte de canaux ; il est bien entendu concevable que les neocons<\/em> y aient jou\u00e9 leur r\u00f4le, y voyant un moyen de mettre l’administration Obama en difficult\u00e9, au profit du candidat Romney dans cette ann\u00e9e d’\u00e9lection pr\u00e9sidentielle.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n\tD’une fa\u00e7on g\u00e9n\u00e9rale, on rel\u00e8ve une fois de plus combien les moyens diplomatiques classiques, traitant de questions que l’on suppose essentielles, sont absolument vuln\u00e9rables aux pressions du syst\u00e8me de la communication lorsque l’arsenal des valeurs ch\u00e8res \u00e0 la postmodernit\u00e9 est activ\u00e9 habilement. Ce jugement vaut d’ailleurs pour l’affaire Cheng, qu’il y ait eu complot, simple manipulation par impulsion ou d\u00e9marche spontan\u00e9e. Dans ce cas et pour cette fois de fa\u00e7on visible, on observe combien la partie US, instigatrice constante de cette sorte de pression, se r\u00e9v\u00e8le elle-m\u00eame extr\u00eamement vuln\u00e9rable au syst\u00e8me qu’elle a si fortement contribu\u00e9 \u00e0 d\u00e9velopper. (La remarque vaut d’autant plus que, lors de ce d\u00e9placement \u00e0 P\u00e9kin, les USA \u00e9taient en position de demandeurs et ne tenaient surtout pas \u00e0 irriter la Chine avec une pol\u00e9mique sur les droits de l’homme, sujet que les Chinois n’appr\u00e9cient gu\u00e8re lorsqu’il s’accompagne n\u00e9cessairement d’une intrusion manifeste dans la souverainet\u00e9 nationale.) <\/p>\n<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
\tMis en ligne le 5 mai 2012 \u00e0 11H42<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
L’affaire Chen et les coutume postmodernistes Nul ne tarit de qualificatifs assez catastrophiques sur l’effet de l’affaire Chen, l’activiste chinois Chen Guangcheng, qui s’est r\u00e9fugi\u00e9 \u00e0 l’ambassade US puis a connu diverses p\u00e9rip\u00e9ties alors qu’une d\u00e9l\u00e9gation US de 200 sp\u00e9cialistes, Hillary Clinton en t\u00eate, se trouvait \u00e0 P\u00e9kin pour une rencontre capitale pour les relations… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[6421,14803,3977,934,2628,14805,3278,3090,1104,7718,14804,6776,2804,6532],"class_list":["post-74689","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-aveugle","tag-cheng","tag-chine","tag-clinton","tag-diplomatie","tag-guangcheng","tag-hillary","tag-influence","tag-neocons","tag-ong","tag-postmodernistes","tag-romney","tag-usa","tag-vulnerabilite"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/74689","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=74689"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/74689\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=74689"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=74689"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=74689"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}