Voici quelques documents int\u00e9ressants montrant l’opposition russe d\u00e9filant \u00e0 l’ambassade US, où vient de s’installer, depuis la fin de l’automne dernier, l’ambassadeur McFaul, sp\u00e9cialiste de l’agitation. Ces films datent de janvier 2012.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
C’est Tony Cartalucci, sur son site nomm\u00e9 LandDestroyer.blogspot<\/em>, qui publie, ce 6 mai 2012<\/a>, une s\u00e9rie de documents vid\u00e9o montrant diverses personnalit\u00e9s de l’opposition se rendant \u00e0 l’ambassade US, ou en sortant, aux alentours de la mi-janvier 2012. C’est \u00e0 cette \u00e9poque qu’une r\u00e9union de coordination rassembla McFaul et les principaux dirigeants de l’opposition (les sujets des diverses vid\u00e9os), pour pr\u00e9parer des actions anti-Poutine dans l’esprit des actions de type –\u00a0\u00bbr\u00e9volution de couleur\u00a0\u00bb, que nous avons design\u00e9es \u00e9galement par l’expression \u00ab\u00a0agression douce\u00a0\u00bb. Les USA sont activement impliqu\u00e9s dans ce processus, qu’ils financent d’ailleurs d’une fa\u00e7on tr\u00e8s officielle.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n Un texte de Cartalucci, accompagnant les vid\u00e9os, est largement r\u00e9f\u00e9renc\u00e9 pour donner le plus possible d’informations sur les circonstances et les personnalit\u00e9s pr\u00e9sentes. En plus de McFaul et des opposants russes, on trouvait les habituels agents d’influence, relais, membres des ONG qui vont bien, qui pullulent dans cette sorte de circonstance. (L’article est \u00e9galement repris sur Infowars.com<\/em> le 7 mai 2012<\/a>.)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n «In mid-January 2012, just days after Michael McFaul arrived in Moscow to begin his stint as US Ambassador to Russia, Russian opposition leaders lined up outside the US Embassy (Russian) to meet him in a bizarre confab that reeked of both treason and duplicity. Approached by journalists inquiring as to why they had all come to greet the US Ambassador, their responses ranged from silence to dismissive gibes. Later, the group of opposition leaders emerged responding only with \u00ab\u00a0you’re Surkov’s propaganda,\u00a0\u00bb meaning the journalists represented government efforts to undermine their work and legitimacy. It is a common response given by Russia’s opposition members when media attempts to question them about their increasingly overt ties to Wall Street and London.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n »Present at the US Embassy confab were regular mainstays of the Western media’s coverage of anti-Vladimir Putin protests, including Boris Nemtsov, Yevgeniya Chirikova of the US State Department’s National Endowment for Democracy (NED) funded \u00ab\u00a0Strategy 31,\u00a0\u00bb Lev Ponomarev of the NED, Ford Foundation, Open Society, and USAID-funded Moscow Helsinki Group, and Liliya Shibanova of NED-funded GOLOS, an allegedly \u00ab\u00a0independent\u00a0\u00bb election monitoring group that served as the primary source of accusations of voting fraud against Putin’s United Russia party. Clearly, this wasn’t the first time both words and cash had been exchanged between the Russian opposition and the US State Department, but is perhaps the most overt example of such flagrant conspiring yet.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n »US Ambassador to Russia, Michael McFaul himself, is a card carrying member of both Freedom House and the National Endowment for Democracy (NED), two organizations notorious for extraterritorial meddling in the foreign affairs of sovereign nations and demonstratively funding, supporting, and directing Russia’s so-called opposition. It was accurately predicted in October 2011’s \u00ab\u00a0Agitator Nominated for Next US \u00ab\u00a0Ambassador\u00a0\u00bb to Russia,\u00a0\u00bb that McFaul’s primary goal would be to continue with America’s \u00ab\u00a0disingenuous front of \u00ab\u00a0resetting\u00a0\u00bb with Russia, while simultaneously subverting the Russian government with US-funded political unrest.\u00a0\u00bb It appears that McFaul has begun his work in earnest.<\/em>»<\/p>\n<\/p>\n Nous avons parl\u00e9 \u00e0 diverses reprises de cette forme d’activisme aliment\u00e9 par le tissu d’organisations para-gouvernementales, non-gouvernementales, etc., par des services et des bureaucraties gouvernementales de l’administration am\u00e9ricaniste (essentiellement au d\u00e9partement d’État). Cet activisme est fond\u00e9e sur une sorte d’id\u00e9ologie que nous nommerions l'\u00a0\u00bbid\u00e9ologie de l’extension forc\u00e9e de la d\u00e9mocratie\u00a0\u00bb (s’entendant, une d\u00e9mocratie de type am\u00e9ricaniste, signifiant une ouverture compl\u00e8te aux int\u00e9r\u00eats am\u00e9ricanistes). Comme nous l’avons rappel\u00e9 plus haut, nous nommons cela \u00ab\u00a0agression douce\u00a0\u00bb (voir notamment nos textes du 14 mars 2012<\/a> et du 9 avril 2012<\/a>). Cet interventionnisme d’influence et de subversion des USA, qui reprend la formule du stalinisme et des \u00ab\u00a0idiots utiles\u00a0\u00bb (selon Staline) pour d\u00e9signer les intellectuels occidentaux qui se firent les relais de l’influence sovi\u00e9tiques dans leurs pays, se d\u00e9ploie sans aucun souci de l’interf\u00e9rence qu’il op\u00e8re dans les relations officielles entre les USA et la Russie. (Les Russes ont d\u00e9j\u00e0 observ\u00e9 ce ph\u00e9nom\u00e8ne en d\u00e9couvrant l’autonomie d’intervention de ces bureaucraties \u00e0 l’int\u00e9rieur de l’appareil gouvernemental US. Nous citions cette remarque, dans notre texte du 9 avril 2012<\/a> : «Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Sergey Ryabkov said in an interview with Russian news agency Interfax that<\/em> [ …] the Russian side had repeatedly voiced this concern to the American partners on different levels. Ryabkov acknowledged that his side had met some understanding on the State Department’s side and even received some particular data on which groups were funded and in what amount, but he said that the concerns remained.<\/em>») Ce m\u00e9canisme a encore fonctionn\u00e9 lors des manifestations de l’opposition autour de la prise de ses fonctions de nouveau pr\u00e9sident russe.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n Les dirigeants russes consid\u00e8rent cet activisme comme extr\u00eamement dommageable et, dans ses ramifications avec les USA, comme une ing\u00e9rences dans les affaires int\u00e9rieures russes et une interf\u00e9rence dans la souverainet\u00e9 russe. Il y a eu une rencontre discr\u00e8te et impromptue, le 4 mai, en marge de la conf\u00e9rence de Moscou sur les antimissiles, entre Poutine et le directeur du National Security Council et conseiller d’Obama pour les affaires de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 national, Thomas Donilon. Poutine a clairement fait savoir \u00e0 Donilon qu’il tenait effectivement cette question pour un contentieux important des relations USA-Russie, du point de vue russe. Il est assur\u00e9 que cette question constituera d\u00e9sormais un dossier important pour la diplomatie russe, qui sera constamment mis en avant lors des contacts avec les USA.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n Mis en ligne le 9 mai 2012 \u00e0 16H25<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" L’opposition russe chez elle \u00e0 l’ambassade US Voici quelques documents int\u00e9ressants montrant l’opposition russe d\u00e9filant \u00e0 l’ambassade US, où vient de s’installer, depuis la fin de l’automne dernier, l’ambassadeur McFaul, sp\u00e9cialiste de l’agitation. Ces films datent de janvier 2012. C’est Tony Cartalucci, sur son site nomm\u00e9 LandDestroyer.blogspot, qui publie, ce 6 mai 2012, une s\u00e9rie… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[10143,5912,14813,14812,2707,5391,916,2730,2746,5913],"class_list":["post-74696","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-donilon","tag-idiots","tag-interference","tag-mcfault","tag-moscou","tag-opposition","tag-poutine","tag-russie","tag-souverainete","tag-utiles"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/74696","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=74696"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/74696\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=74696"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=74696"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=74696"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}