{"id":74727,"date":"2012-05-24T06:41:44","date_gmt":"2012-05-24T06:41:44","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2012\/05\/24\/les-drones-deja-operationnels-aux-usa\/"},"modified":"2012-05-24T06:41:44","modified_gmt":"2012-05-24T06:41:44","slug":"les-drones-deja-operationnels-aux-usa","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2012\/05\/24\/les-drones-deja-operationnels-aux-usa\/","title":{"rendered":"Les drones<\/em> d\u00e9j\u00e0 \u201cop\u00e9rationnels\u201d aux USA"},"content":{"rendered":"

Les drones<\/em> d\u00e9j\u00e0 op\u00e9rationnels aux USA<\/h2>\n<\/p>\n

\tLe jour m\u00eame o\u00f9 nous publiions une analyse sur l’emploi des drones<\/em> (UVS) aux USA m\u00eames (voir le 23 mai 2012<\/a>), le site NaturalNews.com<\/em> annon\u00e7ait que des op\u00e9rations d’utilisation de ces engins aux USA m\u00eames sont d\u00e9j\u00e0 en cours d’une fa\u00e7on routini\u00e8re aux USA. La chose a \u00e9t\u00e9 r\u00e9v\u00e9l\u00e9e par une requ\u00eate faite au nom du Freedom of Information Act (FIA), qui a permis d’obtenir effectivement des pr\u00e9cisions sur des op\u00e9rations de UVS \u00e0 partir de 63 sites, dans vingt \u00c9tats de l’Union.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tC’est la FAA, dont on croyait qu’elle n’avait pas encore autoris\u00e9 de tels vols, qui a du r\u00e9pondre aux requ\u00eates sous l’autorit\u00e9 du FIA. Parmi les pr\u00e9cisions apport\u00e9es, il y a le d\u00e9tail des missions des UVS, surtout employ\u00e9s pour la surveillance de la fronti\u00e8re mexicaine ; mais il y a aussi des missions d’UVS au-dessus de 19 \u00e9tablissements scolaires et universitaires, qui font \u00e9videmment partie d’un programme de surveillance et de s\u00e9curisation sociale. L’emploi des UVS de toutes cat\u00e9gories devrait augmenter exponentiellement aux USA, et la suspicion est grandissante que ce soit largement pour des op\u00e9rations de s\u00e9curisation de la situation sociale dans le pays. Voici des extraits du texte de NatureNews.com<\/em>, le 23 mai 2012<\/a>.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00abFollowing what has been described as a Landmark Freedom of Information Act request, the federal government has been forced to reveal that unmanned spy drones are being launched from 63 sites in 20 states. Further, some of the drones are of a make and model that has been used overseas to target insurgents and terrorists with missiles, the government’s information revealed.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbThe Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), which is authorized to license and track drone usage, says most of the spy crafts are being launched from military installations, police agencies and Border Patrol\/border enforcement entities. But surprisingly, some 19 colleges and universities are also in the spy drone business. Those institutions include Cornell, the University of Colorado, Georgia Tech, and Eastern Gateway Community College, and some experts believe these schools may be developing drone technology, London’s Daily Telegraph reported. Some 21 drone manufacturers are also registered with the FAA to operate the small aerial surveillance craft as well.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbThe FAA released the information in response to a lawsuit by the Electronic Freedom Foundation (EFF), a non-partisan group which advocates for more privacy rights – a tough job in this day and age of wholesale DNA sampling and online eavesdropping by the government and the private sector alike.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbThe EFF’s Web site features – ironically enough – an interactive, Google Earth-type map of the U.S. indicating where the 63 operational sites are located, and describing them. What the descriptions<\/em> don’t<\/em><\/strong> include are the types of drones operating from those sites. The FAA has assured the EFF that the agency will release that information at a later date though no specific one was given<\/em> []<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bb[T]he government doesn’t appear ready or concerned enough about your rights to curb drone usage domestically. In fact, says former New Jersey Superior Court Judge Andrew Napolitano, the Pentagon is rushing headlong into domestic drone deployment, of course as a way to increase our<\/em> security<\/em><\/strong>.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbThe Air Force, writes Napolitano, may be planning to dispatch one to a backyard near you, ostensibly to help local cops find missing persons or kidnap victims, or to chase bad guys. If the drone operator sees you doing anything of interest (Is your fertilizer for the roses or to fuel a bomb? Is that Sudafed for your cold or your meth habit? Are you smoking in front of your kids?), the feds say they may take a picture of you and keep it. The feds predict that they will dispatch or authorize about 30,000 of these unmanned aerial vehicles across America in the next 10 years, he writes.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbAt the same time, the EFF complaint disclosed, about 300 more state and local police departments have applications pending before the FAA to use drones they have already bought (many with federal i.e., taxpayer funds, no less).<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tParall\u00e8lement, le 23 mai 2012<\/a> sur Infowars.com<\/em>, le commentateur Alex Jones pr\u00e9sente un programme documentant diverses initiatives en d\u00e9veloppement, impliquant l’usage de drones<\/em> pour le maintien de l’ordre. Une r\u00e9f\u00e9rence est donn\u00e9e vers un texte du 23 mai 2012<\/a> du site-parent PrisonPlanet.com<\/em>, donnant des pr\u00e9cisions sur les projets des forces de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 aux USA pour l’emploi de drones<\/em> \u00e9quip\u00e9s, et m\u00eame arm\u00e9s pour le maintien de l’ordre.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\n

dedefensa.org<\/em><\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Les drones d\u00e9j\u00e0 op\u00e9rationnels aux USA Le jour m\u00eame o\u00f9 nous publiions une analyse sur l’emploi des drones (UVS) aux USA m\u00eames (voir le 23 mai 2012), le site NaturalNews.com annon\u00e7ait que des op\u00e9rations d’utilisation de ces engins aux USA m\u00eames sont d\u00e9j\u00e0 en cours d’une fa\u00e7on routini\u00e8re aux USA. La chose a \u00e9t\u00e9 r\u00e9v\u00e9l\u00e9e… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[14],"tags":[9671,2867,583,14841,14840],"class_list":["post-74727","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-ouverture-libre","tag-alex","tag-drones","tag-jones","tag-securisation","tag-uvs"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/74727","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=74727"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/74727\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=74727"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=74727"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=74727"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}