\tLe Calendrier des Mayas avait-il pr\u00e9vu le Fiscal Cliff<\/em> ? Question \u00e0 $64.000, qui concerne la psychologie de l’hyperpuissance r\u00e9duite aux acqu\u00eats des jeux st\u00e9riles du paralytique en phase terminale qu’est devenu l’appareil du pouvoir washingtonien. Les articles sur le d\u00e9clin acc\u00e9l\u00e9r\u00e9 de la puissance US abondent en ces jours de panique tranquille<\/a>, \u00e0 ce point o\u00f9 l’on peut vous dire que, quoi qu’il arrive \u00e0 Washington d’ici mardi, et m\u00eame aujourd’hui peut-\u00eatre, qu’importe, le mal est fait d\u00e9j\u00e0, et l’on entend d\u00e9j\u00e0 le tsunami<\/em> de sarcasmes qui accueillerait un accord de derni\u00e8re minute, dont nul ne douterait qu’il ne servirait qu’\u00e0 donner un peu de temps \u00e0 chacun des deux partenaires pour trahir l’autre et revenir sur ses engagements.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n \tL’humeur de Pentagone est cr\u00e9pusculaire, Hagel ou pas Hagel<\/a>, et s\u00e9questration ou pas s\u00e9questration<\/a>. Un article de Mackenzie Eaglen, ce 28 d\u00e9cembre 2012<\/a>, sur le site AOL Defense<\/em>, dresse un tableau catastrophique de la situation de la puissance militaire des USA. Eaglen, membre du conseil d’administration de l’\u00e9diteur de ce site tr\u00e8s influent, vient de l’American Economic Institute \t\u00abStill, some brass are clinging to the hope that they may not have to revise the January document in light of sequestration if it occurs. But even casual observers know that the guidance issued before the 2013 budget simply did not add up. The long-standing strategy-resource mismatch was never before so rawly exposed as with the latest guidance and subsequent budget.<\/em> <\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00bbThe pivot was so powerless that senior Navy officials were repeatedly called over to the White House throughout the Presidential election season to explain, re-explain, and then explain again how and why the Administration was pivoting to Asia yet shrinking and aging both the Navy and Air Force.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00bbRegardless of whatever window dressing is used to pitch any new strategy if needed, the bottom line is that it will force the U.S. military to abandon for good its long-standing two-war construct to one that looks more like the defense posture of the rest of the world.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00bbThe two-war construct, as imprecise a measurement as it was, provided a basis of comparison against which to assess American hard power. The ability to fight and win in two major engagements at once proved to be a reasonable approximation of the forces necessary to maintain a military with global reach and responsibilities. The official death of this standard means that America will not be able to do as much around the world because of increased strain on shrinking forces.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00bbIt would seem the newest report by the intelligence community predicting the U.S. will lose its superpower status will turn out to be quite accurate, unfortunately.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n \tMis en ligne le 28 d\u00e9cembre 2012 \u00e0 17H18<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Le cr\u00e9puscule des Mayas Le Calendrier des Mayas avait-il pr\u00e9vu le Fiscal Cliff ? Question \u00e0 $64.000, qui concerne la psychologie de l’hyperpuissance r\u00e9duite aux acqu\u00eats des jeux st\u00e9riles du paralytique en phase terminale qu’est devenu l’appareil du pouvoir washingtonien. Les articles sur le d\u00e9clin acc\u00e9l\u00e9r\u00e9 de la puissance US abondent en ces jours de… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[5994,7843,15253,7921,14816,15317,6521,3194,11367,3440],"class_list":["post-74766","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-asie","tag-basculement","tag-cliff","tag-dick","tag-eaglen","tag-fiscqal","tag-moby","tag-pentagone","tag-sequestration","tag-strategie"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/74766","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=74766"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/74766\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=74766"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=74766"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=74766"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}