Lightning<\/em>, lui, au moins, \u00e9tait un honn\u00eate chasseur qui \u00e9tait capable de voler, et on en fourgua m\u00eame aux Saoudiens, amor\u00e7ant ainsi une fructueuse collaboration.)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n\tBref, la chronique du JSF devient cocasse. O\u00f9 l’on apprend, selon un rapport fuit\u00e9 vers le Telegraph<\/em>, qu’une trop grande proximit\u00e9 d’un orage avec ses \u00e9clairs pourrait faire exploser les r\u00e9servoirs de k\u00e9ros\u00e8ne du JSF, si un \u00e9clair s’avisait d’avoir le mauvais go\u00fbt de toucher l’auguste machine. La chose est consid\u00e9r\u00e9e comme suffisamment grave pour interdire aux JSF en cours d’essais de voler \u00e0 moins de 25 miles d’un orage. Le rapport cit\u00e9 par le Telegraph<\/em> ajoute que des fissures ont \u00e9t\u00e9 d\u00e9cel\u00e9es dans diverses parties, notamment sur les ailes et le logement du r\u00e9acteur, notamment sur l’un ou l’autre F-35A (version USAF) et l’un ou l’autre F-35B (version \u00e0 d\u00e9collage verticale, pour les Marines et les Britanniques). Toutes ces choses pourraient conduire \u00e0 la n\u00e9cessit\u00e9 de redessiner certaines parties de l’avion, avec le suppl\u00e9ment de poids que supposerait un renforcement des r\u00e9servoirs, cela entra\u00eenant diverses p\u00e9nalit\u00e9s. On ne vous dit pas ce que cela signifierait en suppl\u00e9ment de co\u00fbts, d’autant que les avions d\u00e9j\u00e0 produits devraient revenir \u00e0 l’usine pour les modifications ad hoc<\/em>. L’optimisme r\u00e8gne<\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00abAttempts to increase fuel efficiency by reducing the jet’s weight have also made it more vulnerable to enemy attack than the generation of aircraft it was supposed to replace. The damaging findings were disclosed in a Pentagon document which revealed that a fault within the JSF’s fuel tank could potentially lead to catastrophic explosion if the aircraft was struck by lightning in a thunderstorm. The report from the Pentagon’s Operational Test and Evaluation Office states that all test flying within 25 miles of thunderstorms is not permitted until a device in the fuel tank which maintains correct oxygen levels is redesigned<\/em> []<\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00abExaminations by the United States Air Force and the Lockheed Martin, the aircraft’s manufacturer, also discovered a handful of cracks in the tested aircraft, including on the right wing and right engine of the F-35A variant, and on another part of the F-35B variant. All of these discoveries will require mitigation plans and may include redesigning parts and additional weight, the report added<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n\tL’article se termine par la r\u00e9action du constructeur du JSF Lockheed Martin \u00e0 cette nouvelle, qu’il connaissait \u00e9videmment. Elle est, cette r\u00e9action, tout aussi \u00e9videmment, compl\u00e8tement rassurante et consiste \u00e0 dire que ce qui est continue \u00e0 \u00eatre, savoir, que le JSF est le grand avion de combat que l’on sait, le plus grand et le plus fameux du XXI\u00e8me si\u00e8cle. Par cons\u00e9quence de cette affirmation, il le restera, tr\u00e8s grand et fameux, notamment gr\u00e2ce \u00e0 ses capacit\u00e9s de furtivit\u00e9 (comment voulez-vous qu’un \u00e9clair puisse le toucher puisque le JSF est stealth<\/em>, et par cons\u00e9quent invisible aux \u00e9clairs ?) : \u00abA spokesman for Lockheed Martin said: \u00ab\u00a0The F-35 is a stealth aircraft and by definition it is less vulnerable than any fourth generation fighter flying today. We don’t consider this a major issue. We have demonstrated very good vulnerability performance and we continue to work this with the Joint Programme Office.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
\tMis en ligne le 21 janvier 2013 \u00e0 10H52<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
L’\u00e9clair qui avait peur de l’\u00e9clair Certes, on pourra, on devra nous le reprocher ; parce que profiter d’un jeu de mots si \u00e9vident, c’est d\u00e9loyal pour notre petit camarade (dito, le JSF) ; parce que celui qui nous en fournit l’occasion l’a fait lui-m\u00eame pour son compte et qu’on pourra, qu’on devra nous soup\u00e7onner… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[250,5586,3411],"class_list":["post-74804","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-jsf","tag-lightning","tag-stealth"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/74804","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=74804"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/74804\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=74804"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=74804"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=74804"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}