\tCon Coughlin, chroniqueur \u00e9m\u00e9rite du Daily Telegraph<\/em> et sp\u00e9cialiste du quotidien londonien pour les affaires am\u00e9ricanistes, nous donnait, ce 16 avril 2013<\/a>, une chronique m\u00e9lancolique sur l’attentat du marathon de Boston. Quelle diff\u00e9rence avec 9\/11 o\u00f9 l’affaire ne fit pas un pli Cette fois, ce qui fut remarquable dans les heures qui ont suivi l’affreuse chose, (et m\u00eame 24 heures apr\u00e8s, et m\u00eame 36 heures apr\u00e8s), c’est le d\u00e9sarroi devant la multiplicit\u00e9 des pistes et des coupables possibles. Cela, \u00e9crit tristement Coughlin, c’est l’Am\u00e9rique du pr\u00e9sident Obama, car cette diversit\u00e9 des possibles coupables nous montre quel pays divis\u00e9 l’Am\u00e9rique est devenue Obama nous avait promis l’unit\u00e9 am\u00e9ricaniste retrouv\u00e9e et il nous a donn\u00e9 la division am\u00e9ricaniste, plus que jamais, ce qui est la raison pour laquelle les autorit\u00e9s US cherchent du c\u00f4t\u00e9 des groupes extr\u00e9mistes int\u00e9rieurs autant que du c\u00f4t\u00e9 des groupes terroristes internationaux comme al Qa\u00efda comme suspects potentiels <\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00abGiven the various narrow escapes the US has recently experienced from Islamist terror cells the underpants bomber in Detroit, the ink cartridge bombs, the failed Times Square bombing etc it was inevitable that, in the immediate aftermath of the bombings, the initial suspicions were that the bombings were the work of Islamist fanatics. And while that could still be the case, investigators are now turning their attention increasingly towards home-grown extreme Right-wing groups which are equally as capable of conducting such an outrage. Timothy McVeigh’s attack on a Federal complex in Oklahoma in 1995 which killed 168 people was carried out in the name of his lunatic Right-wing agenda.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00bbNow investigators are looking at the numerous anti-government, Right-wing Patriot groups that have sprung up since Mr Obama came to power. In particular, they are said to be outraged at the Obama administration’s attempts to introduce gun control legislation. Certainly the sharp rise in the number of Patriot groups they have grown by a staggering 813 percent during the past four years suggests Mr Obama’s has much work to do if he is to stand any chance of healing America’s deeply divided society.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n \tBrandon Smith, de Alt-Market.com<\/em>, avait eu une autre th\u00e8se, toujours quelques heures apr\u00e8s l’attentat. Pour lui, l’attente de la d\u00e9signation d’un suspect tenait simplement aux d\u00e9lib\u00e9rations du gouvernement, du type : \u00e0 qui faire porter le chapeau, de la fa\u00e7on la plus int\u00e9ressante pour nous ?. Cela, \u00e0 la lumi\u00e8re de la citation de Rahm Emanuel, ancien chef de cabinet d’Obama reconverti dans l’une des fonctions les plus appr\u00e9ci\u00e9es d’Al Capone (maire de Chicago), qui nous dit effectivement qu’il ne faut jamais gaspiller une bonne crise : \u00abYou never let a serious crisis go to waste. And what I mean by that it’s an opportunity to do things you think you could not do before.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n \tL\u00e0-dessus, Brandon Smith nous explique comment l’attaque de Boston ressemble \u00e0 s’y m\u00e9prendre \u00e0 celles que Gladio<\/em> avaient organis\u00e9 en Italie, dans les ann\u00e9es 1970, ces ann\u00e9es de plomb qui furent prisonni\u00e8res de la strat\u00e9gie de la tension Ainsi le gouvernement aurait-il organis\u00e9 cette attaque avant m\u00eame de songer \u00e0 qui il pourrait l’attribuer. (Est-ce si absurde, grotesque, marque d’une obsession du complot et ainsi de suite ? M\u00eame cela, nous n’oserions l’affirmer, parce que m\u00eame cela ne serait pas tout \u00e0 fait impossible, tant tous les possibles, y compris les presque-impossibles, sont pr\u00e9sents dans nos esprits et au bout de nos plumes comme des possibilit\u00e9s-apr\u00e8s-tout) (Sur Alt-Market.com<\/em>, le 16 avril 2013<\/a>.)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00abWhile many people might immediately dismiss the concept, any student of true and unadulterated history has to eventually admit this fact: Governments exploit crisis. Sometimes, they merely take advantage of the ensuing chaos and aftermath of a disaster they had nothing to do with directly. Other times, they create those disasters themselves in order to engineer social and political opportunity. In regard to the recent bombing of the Boston Marathon, which killed three people and injured at least 140, I have asked Who do they plan to blame? The unaware and na\u00efve will state that They will blame the true culprit behind the attack, of course!<\/em> []<\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00bbThe Boston bombing already has the makings of a subversive and highly exploitable false flag event, and certain undertones remind me of the now exposed Operation Gladio, a false flag program utilized by NATO governments (including the U.S.) for decades which involved multiple bombings and mass shootings of high traffic public areas across Europe that were then falsely blamed on left-wing terrorists. The operation was exposed in the early 1990’s by the Italian government, and then quickly swept into the dust bin of history. Vincenzo Vinciguerra, a far-right terrorist linked to Gladio and currently serving a life-sentence for the car bomb murder of three policemen stated during sworn testimony on Gladio in March of 2001: You had to attack civilians, the people, women, children, innocent people, unknown people far removed from any political gameThe reason was quite simple. They were supposed to force these people, the Italian public, to turn to the state to ask for greater security. This is the political logic that lies behind all the massacres and the bombings which remain unpunished, because the state cannot convict itself or declare itself responsible for what happened<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00bbThe strategy used by NATO was clear terrorize the common population, target as many innocents as possible in places where they felt most comfortable and at ease, and drive the citizenry into the waiting arms of the establishment. The tactic creates the cancerous spread of public tension because the sense of distance from violence is removed. An attack could literally happen anytime, anywhere. A predetermined scapegoat enemy is then presented, completing the circle and galvanizing the people in the direction the establishment desires.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00bbThe methods used in Europe to demonize left-wing political movements could just as easily be used to demonize what some call right-wing political movements here in the U.S <\/em> [] Along with the immediate strangeness of the attack, the timing is also rather perfect for the establishment. April 15th is tax day across the nation, and Tax Protest Day sponsored annually by Tea Party organizations across the country also just happened to fall on the 15th this year. On top of this, in Massachusetts, Patriots Day (a civic holiday celebrating the battles of Lexington and Concord) is held on the third Monday of April every year, which just happened to be the 15th this year. Oath Keepers, a constitutional organization often wrongly attacked as a domestic extremist group by the DHS and SPLC, just happened to have a large pro-freedom rally scheduled for the 19th of April at Lexington Green in Massachusetts. Are we starting to get the picture here?<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00bbWith the Senate in the midst of the most blatant attack on our 2nd Amendment rights in history following the passage of the absurdly fascist NDAA and the White House’s unwillingness to remove American citizens as potential targets for executive ordered assassination, and with multiple states now implementing draconian gun restrictions and even confiscations, public opinion is clearly turning against the Federal Government. Wouldn’t it be beneficial for their agenda if it turned out that the Boston Marathon Bombing was executed by a group of pro-gun anti-income tax anti-government domestic terrorists, or maybe just Constitutionalists and Liberty Movement activists that are labeled as such?…<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t… Nous aussi, nous l’avouons, nous avons eu cette question \u00e0 l’esprit, presque une journ\u00e9e apr\u00e8s l’attentat de Boston : mais qu’attendent-ils donc pour d\u00e9signer le coupable ? Du temps de 9\/11, \u00e7a ne tra\u00eenait pas, et c’est tout juste si l’on n’\u00e9tait pas inform\u00e9 avant<\/strong>. Cette fois, au contraire, la restriction est la r\u00e8gle, avec notamment un Obama h\u00e9sitant longuement \u00e0 propos de l’utilisation du mot terroriste qu’il s’interdit d’employer dans sa premi\u00e8re intervention, de m\u00eame que toute sp\u00e9culation concernant l’origine des auteurs de l’attaque. (Reuters, le 16 avril 2013<\/a> : \u00abWhite House officials and investigators said it was too early to say whether the Boston attacks were carried out by a foreign or homegrown group, or to identify a motive.<\/em>\u00bb)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n \tCela lui est vertement reproch\u00e9 par DEBKAFiles<\/em>, qui, lui, sait parfaitement de qui il s’agit. Le site isra\u00e9lien, si proche des services de s\u00e9curit\u00e9, entend transformer l’attentat de Boston en un argument irr\u00e9sistible, \u00e0 la fois pour entretenir la mobilisation contre le terrorisme islamique, \u00e0 la fois pour disposer d’arguments contre les pays dont on est s\u00fbr, \u00e9videmment, qu’ils sont les sources du terrorisme, l’Iran, certes, ferait bien l’affaire, et une attaque contre ce pays, \u00e9galement. Dans une premi\u00e8re intervention, le 16 avril 2013<\/a> encore, DEBKAFiles<\/em> compara l’attitude d’Obama en l’occurrence \u00e0 celle que son administration avait montr\u00e9e, toujours selon DEBKAFiles<\/em>, lors de l’attaque de Benghazi du 11 septembre 2012.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00abTuesday, the FBI admitted a potential terrorist inquiry was underway, although President Barack Obama, when he pledged justice for the perpetrators, carefully skirted the term terror. This recalls his administration’s refusal to brand as an act of terror the attack on the US consulate in Benghazi on Sept. 11, 2012, and the murder of Ambassador Chris Stevens, although it was clearly the work of an al Qaeda element. Counterterrorism experts are equally certain of the Middle East terrorist hallmarks on the Boston Marathon bombings, although it is too soon<\/em> [] Unlike the president, Sen. Dianne Feinstein, Chairperson of the Senate Intelligence Committee, had no compunctions about putting into words the general suspicion. Straight after the event, she said, My understanding is that it’s a terrorist incident although it is too soon to say whether it was carried out by a foreign or domestic element.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n \tDEBKAFiles<\/em> revient sur l’affaire quelques heures plus tard, toujours ce m\u00eame 16 avril 2013<\/a>. Il nous assure qu’il a des r\u00e9v\u00e9lations nouvelles des enqu\u00eateurs eux-m\u00eames, qu’il s’agit d’une cellule saoudienne d’al Qa\u00efda, et terminant par un nous vous l’avions bien dit en invitant \u00e0 relire le texte pr\u00e9c\u00e9dent (on n’a jamais de meilleure source que soi-m\u00eame \u00e9crivant quelques heures plus t\u00f4t des r\u00e9v\u00e9lations sur le sujet). <\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00abDEBKAfile’s counterterrorism sources can disclose however that the investigation has in fact homed in on a suspected terror cell of three Saudi nationals, very possibly tied to Al Qaeda.<\/em> [] The origins of the Saudi cell, if confirmed, strongly suggest that Al Qaeda of Arabia AQAP succeeded in planting a cell in the United States for the bombing attack in Boston and possibly more than one in other parts of the US. Asir Province is known as a hotbed of resistance to the Saudi throne in Riyadh.<\/em> []<\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00bbDEBKAfile earlier Tuesday was alone in reporting that the FBI Boston Marathon probe pointed to Mid-East terrorists with domestic support.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00bbRead on:<\/em>\u00bb <\/p>\n<\/p>\n \tBoston est donc le deuxi\u00e8me attentat depuis 9\/11 Mais deuxi\u00e8me quoi ? Attentat d’al Qa\u00efda ? Attentat \u00e0 la bombe ? Attentat terroriste ? Attentat d’un groupe US anti-Obama ? Impossible de qualifier pr\u00e9cis\u00e9ment la chose en prenant la r\u00e9f\u00e9rence sacr\u00e9e, qu’il est essentiel de ne pas \u00e9carter (depuis 9\/11). D’autres \u00e9v\u00e9nements se sont pass\u00e9s depuis et il est difficile de faire de l’attaque de Boston quelque chose d’aussi purement d\u00e9finie que le fut 9\/11, de fa\u00e7on \u00e0 lui donner une place dans la mythologie des \u00e9poques de la guerre contre la Terreur qui se sont succ\u00e9d\u00e9es depuis 9\/11. D\u00e9sormais, \u00e0 c\u00f4t\u00e9 de la mythologie du terrorisme ext\u00e9rieure, se trouve en effet, et en tr\u00e8s bonne place, la mythologie de la r\u00e9sistance int\u00e9rieure (US).<\/p>\n<\/p>\n \tLe site Infowars.com<\/em>, qui ne cesse d’accumuler les textes depuis l’attaque de Boston en faisant jouer sa pr\u00e9occupation fondamentale qui est int\u00e9rieure et son hostilit\u00e9 au gouvernement Obama et aux lib\u00e9raux-progressistes qui le soutiennent encore, est largement aid\u00e9 par ces m\u00eames lib\u00e9raux-progressistes dont nombre se sont pr\u00e9cipit\u00e9s sur la piste int\u00e9rieure. Le site reprend (le 16 avril 2013<\/a>) les diverses analyses et informations qui ont suivi une intervention dite –tweet\u00e9e<\/em> de Michael Moore, le cin\u00e9aste et documentaliste progressiste dont la soutien \u00e0 Obama ne s’est jamais d\u00e9menti : \u00abTax Day. Patriots Day<\/em>\u00bb, \u00e9crivit Moore Pour une fois, Infowars.com<\/em> n’a pas \u00e0 sp\u00e9culer lui-m\u00eame, il lui suffit de citer, et de citer des sources qui ne sont pas de ses amies.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00abThe filmmaker was not giving us a math lesson, but rather insinuating to his 1.5 million followers that they should put two and two together to figure out who was behind the bombings,writes Red Alert Politics. Even Mediaite found Moore’s accusation over-the-top. Documentary filmmaker Michael Moore was uncharacteristically cryptic about his thoughts on the Boston bombings, but it didn’t take a mathematical genius to figure out just what he was saying here: This must be the work of anti-government, anti-tax Tea Party right-wing whatevers, because just because, Andrew Kirell wrote earlier today<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n \tAinsi s’impose le premier enseignement de ces premi\u00e8res 24 heures ou 36 heures apr\u00e8s la deuxi\u00e8me attaque terroriste la plus meurtri\u00e8re aux USA depuis 9\/11 (si l’on tient \u00e0 la mythologie, et l’on sait que cette mythologie-l\u00e0 est fondamentalement celle des USA, et que tout ce qui se passe aux USA doit \u00eatre marquant pour notre civilisation toute enti\u00e8re, c’est-\u00e0-dire notre contre-civilisation et le Syst\u00e8me). Le r\u00e9flexe fondamental, l’\u00e9lan irr\u00e9fragable de la psychologie collective aux USA depuis 9\/11 a chang\u00e9 d’une fa\u00e7on extr\u00eamement importante. Dans ce qu’on nomme l’inconscient collectif, qui n’est pour nous que la psychologie collective bien plus ouverte et lisible dans toute sa vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 face \u00e0 la puissance du syst\u00e8me de la communication qui relaie les grands courants de la perception, la situation de crise int\u00e9rieure et d’affrontement avec le centre<\/a> aux USA tient d\u00e9sormais une place au moins aussi importante<\/strong> que la situation de la guerre contre la terreur (n\u00e9cessairement ext\u00e9rieure, n\u00e9cessairement islamiste, selon les automatismes de communication). Il s’agit l\u00e0 d’un enseignement fondamental pour nous dire l’\u00e9tat d’esprit des populations comme des directions politiques du Syst\u00e8me. En ce sens, nous dirions que les r\u00e9actions de perception (qui n’ont rien \u00e0 voir avec les r\u00e9alit\u00e9s des responsabilit\u00e9s) suivant l’attaque du marathon de Boston nous montrent ce qui est en fait un grave revers du Syst\u00e8me. La crise du terrorisme (ext\u00e9rieur), qui constituait le parfait faux-nez pour r\u00e9orienter vers l’ext\u00e9rieur et vers le mythe 9\/11, en leur \u00f4tant toute tentation antiSyst\u00e8me, tous les \u00e9v\u00e9nements incontr\u00f4lables \u00e0 l’origine, et les r\u00e9actions de la psychologie collective qui vont avec, a d\u00e9sormais un concurrent de taille, au moins aussi puissant, sinon plus, qui est la crise int\u00e9rieure des USA. Ce deuxi\u00e8me facteur qui est d\u00e9sormais intronis\u00e9 comme argument majeur et comme mati\u00e8re fondamentale de p\u00e9n\u00e9tration de la psychologie<\/strong>, met en cause, lui, directement le Syst\u00e8me dans sa substance antiSyst\u00e8me \u00e9vidente.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n \tMis en ligne le 17 avril 2013 \u00e0 05H27<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Un attentat en qu\u00eate de coupables Con Coughlin, chroniqueur \u00e9m\u00e9rite du Daily Telegraph et sp\u00e9cialiste du quotidien londonien pour les affaires am\u00e9ricanistes, nous donnait, ce 16 avril 2013, une chronique m\u00e9lancolique sur l’attentat du marathon de Boston. Quelle diff\u00e9rence avec 9\/11 o\u00f9 l’affaire ne fit pas un pli Cette fois, ce qui fut remarquable dans… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[354,370,3936,4646,4320,3037,5575,4413,2645,8535,3947,2622,12084,4357,915,7069,3950,4242,2755,8256,3744,1267],"class_list":["post-74938","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-354","tag-370","tag-al","tag-antisysteme","tag-boston","tag-contre","tag-day","tag-gladio","tag-guerre","tag-interieure","tag-islamisme","tag-la","tag-marathon","tag-michael","tag-moore","tag-party","tag-patriot","tag-qaida","tag-resistance","tag-tea","tag-terreur","tag-terrorisme"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/74938","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=74938"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/74938\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=74938"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=74938"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=74938"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}