{"id":74968,"date":"2013-05-06T05:23:47","date_gmt":"2013-05-06T05:23:47","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2013\/05\/06\/ukip-antisysteme-langleterre-est-vraiment-europeenne\/"},"modified":"2013-05-06T05:23:47","modified_gmt":"2013-05-06T05:23:47","slug":"ukip-antisysteme-langleterre-est-vraiment-europeenne","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2013\/05\/06\/ukip-antisysteme-langleterre-est-vraiment-europeenne\/","title":{"rendered":"UKIP antiSyst\u00e8me : l&rsquo;Angleterre est vraiment europ\u00e9enne"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><h2 class=\"common-article2\">UKIP antiSyst\u00e8me : l&rsquo;Angleterre est vraiment europ\u00e9enne<\/h2>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tLe nouveau ph\u00e9nom\u00e8ne politique britannique se nomme Nigel Farage, ou bien encore <LIEN=http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/UK_Independence_Party>UKIP, qui est le nom du parti qu&rsquo;il dirige,  le <em>United Kingdom Independent Party<\/em>. La semaine derni\u00e8re, UKIP a fait une installation tonitruante de lui-m\u00eame sur la sc\u00e8ne politique britannique&#8230; Non que UKIP soit de cr\u00e9ation r\u00e9cente, puisqu&rsquo;il a \u00e9t\u00e9 fond\u00e9 en 1991 contre le trait\u00e9 de Maastricht, mais parce qu&rsquo;il a obtenu, pour la premi\u00e8re fois dans une \u00e9lection nationale r\u00e9guli\u00e8re, un r\u00e9sultat ph\u00e9nom\u00e9nal pour lui. (UKIP a toujours plafonn\u00e9, pour les \u00e9lections nationales, \u00e9lections europ\u00e9ennes non incluses, autour de 3%-4%.) UKIP a emport\u00e9 23% des voix lors des \u00e9lections municipales, contre 29% aux travaillistes, 25% aux conservateurs et 14% aux lib\u00e9raux. Pour la premi\u00e8re fois dans l&rsquo;histoire politique moderne du Royaume-Uni, aucun parti, et notamment aucun des deux grands partis n&rsquo;a d\u00e9pass\u00e9 30% des voix dans une \u00e9lection nationale, \u00e0 cause de UKIP.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tEssentiellement eurosceptique d\u00e8s l&rsquo;origine, UKIP se pr\u00e9sente \u00e9galement comme libertarien, avec des orientations diverses et des connexions qui peuvent aussi bien conduire \u00e0 une appr\u00e9ciation critique de ses v\u00e9ritables buts par les commentateurs-Syst\u00e8me (habituels soup\u00e7ons d&rsquo;\u00eatre d&rsquo;extr\u00eame droite, \u00e9galement tr\u00e8s conservateur au niveau <a href=\"http:\/\/www.dedefensa.org\/article-transmutation-syst_me_du_social_au_soci_tal_et_cons_quences_30_04_2013.html\" class=\"gen\">soci\u00e9tal<\/a>, sp\u00e9cificit\u00e9 de l&rsquo;engagement libertarien, etc.). L&rsquo;essentiel est que UKIP est devenu, dans la perception g\u00e9n\u00e9rale et quoi qu&rsquo;il en soit de ses orientations, la version anglaise du parti d\u00e9sormais classique en Europe, un parti de protestation en passe de devenir antiSyst\u00e8me par la force des choses.  On le met instinctivement et intuitivement comme \u00e9quivalent du Front National en France, de <a href=\"http:\/\/www.dedefensa.org\/article-la_trag_die_de_la_tension_09_03_2013.html\" class=\"gen\">M5S<\/a> en Italie, de Tsipras en Gr\u00e8ce, etc., tous ces partis dont l&rsquo;orientation politique est moins importante que la position antiSyst\u00e8me qu&rsquo;ils sont amen\u00e9s \u00e0 occuper. Il est remarquable qu&rsquo;\u00e0 l&rsquo;instar de ces partis chacun dans leur pays, l&rsquo;UKIP peut aujourd&rsquo;hui pr\u00e9tendre capturer plus ou moins un quart de l&rsquo;\u00e9lectorat, dans une situation extr\u00eamement insaisissable et en constant changement, et d&rsquo;un changement qui lui est <em>a priori<\/em> favorable (Farage pr\u00e9voyait 14% des voix l\u00e0 o\u00f9 UKIP en a re\u00e7u 23%). Ses r\u00e9sultats de la semaine derni\u00e8re constituent, sans surprise, un choc terrifiant pour les partis du Syst\u00e8me. D&rsquo;une fa\u00e7on g\u00e9n\u00e9rale, Farage est extr\u00eamement pessimiste pour l&rsquo;avenir et estime que la situation europ\u00e9enne va mener \u00e0 des \u00e9meutes sociales avec des cons\u00e9quences politiques graves (voir <em>SHTF.plan<\/em>, le <a href=\"http:\/\/www.shtfplan.com\/headline-news\/farage-warns-it-will-be-wholesale-violent-revolution-video_05022013\" class=\"gen\">2 mai 2013<\/a>.)  De ce point de vue comme du point de vue libertarien qu&rsquo;il affiche, Farage est tr\u00e8s proche de l&rsquo;analyse de Ron Paul aux USA.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t<em>The Observer<\/em> du <a href=\"http:\/\/www.guardian.co.uk\/politics\/2013\/may\/04\/nigel-farage-changes-british-politics\" class=\"gen\">5 mai 2013<\/a>, consacre une longue analyse \u00e0 Farage et \u00e0 son parti UKIP. On retrouve les m\u00eames constats, les m\u00eames remarques, les m\u00eames appr\u00e9ciations que dans les autres pays, lorsqu&rsquo;un parti de cette sorte prend sa position et sa place naturelles dans l&rsquo;infrastructure crisique, particuli\u00e8rement dans une Europe martyris\u00e9e par l&rsquo;Europe institutionnelle et sa politique relayant les consignes des institutions du genre. On en termine donc avec la remarque ironiquement paradoxale que l&rsquo;Angleterre n&rsquo;est r\u00e9ellement ancr\u00e9e dans l&rsquo;Europe, n&rsquo;est r\u00e9ellement europ\u00e9enne dans le sens d&rsquo;une unit\u00e9 politique et d&rsquo;une solidarit\u00e9 d&rsquo;orientation qu&rsquo;avec l&rsquo;UKIP, parti parfaitement anti-europ\u00e9en&#8230;<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00ab<em>When Nigel Farage needs a break he heads out to sea. On Saturday, after 24 hours of wall-to-wall media appearances he drove to the south coast and went fishing in the Channel with friends. It was the only place he could be sure of being out of mobile phone contact. I turn the bugger off, he told the Observer. \u00ab It clears the head. When I am out there I don&rsquo;t think about anything except what bait to use, what lure to use and why some other bloke is catching more than me. It makes me get very competitive again.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>Farage was briefly cutting himself adrift from politics after his party, Ukip, had stirred up the waters as never before by securing a stunning 23% of the vote in Thursday&rsquo;s local elections. Farage had predicted that Ukip would take at least 14% a couple of weeks ago, which many had thought was wildly optimistic. But it exceeded his wildest dreams, increasing its number of council seats from eight to 147 overnight, eating into the Tory, Labour and Liberal Democrat support across the country and redrawing the local government map. For the first time ever, none of the mainstream parties took more than the 30% of the vote. Labour secured 29%, the Tories 25% and the Lib Dems 14%.<\/em> <strong><em>Nothing like it had happened before.<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>Up until this weekend experts had doubted Ukip&rsquo;s ability to establish itself as more than a protest party, and believed that it would fade at the 2015 general election, as it had in 2010. But those experts are changing their tune. Tony Travers, of the London School of Economics, said: I am normally cautious but I do think the tectonic plates are shifting. There is definitely a change going on. The share of the vote of the main two parties has been declining since the 1950s. But it is now even lower than it was at the height of the scandal over MPs expenses in 2009. You can half imagine David Cameron, Ed Miliband and Nick Clegg having to have a meeting to think what to do as Ukip is hurting them all.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>On Thursday afternoon, when voting was still under way, a Ukip official rang Radio 4&rsquo;s Today programme asking if it wanted Farage on the show the next morning and was given a noncommittal response. At 5.55am on Friday, as it was clear Ukip was making big inroads, Today rang back to book Farage in for a prime slot. They had woken up to the fact that we really were the story, said Gawain Towler, Farage&rsquo;s spokesman.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>So what, for the man at the centre of it all who seems to appeal more to voters whatever is thrown at him, had been the biggest lesson? Simple. It is that the rest of them don&rsquo;t speak the same language as normal people, he said. They can&rsquo;t connect with people out there. The change that has happened to people&rsquo;s lives from immigration is extraordinary, but the other parties have nothing to say about it. They make vague promises and don&rsquo;t deliver.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>\n<p class=\"signature\"><em>dedefensa.org<\/em><\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>UKIP antiSyst\u00e8me : l&rsquo;Angleterre est vraiment europ\u00e9enne Le nouveau ph\u00e9nom\u00e8ne politique britannique se nomme Nigel Farage, ou bien encore UKIP, qui est le nom du parti qu&rsquo;il dirige, le United Kingdom Independent Party. La semaine derni\u00e8re, UKIP a fait une installation tonitruante de lui-m\u00eame sur la sc\u00e8ne politique britannique&#8230; Non que UKIP soit de cr\u00e9ation&hellip;&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[14],"tags":[4646,6744,398,12137,12136,5835,6985,11978,12138,3140,3310,12139,12135],"class_list":["post-74968","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-ouverture-libre","tag-antisysteme","tag-emeutes","tag-europe","tag-eurosceptique","tag-farage","tag-front","tag-libertarien","tag-m5s","tag-natinal","tag-paul","tag-ron","tag-sociales","tag-ukip"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/74968","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=74968"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/74968\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=74968"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=74968"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=74968"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}