19 juin 2013<\/a>), Paul attaque les derni\u00e8res d\u00e9clarations du chef de la NSA, le g\u00e9n\u00e9ral Alexander, selon lesquelles le programme PRISM et le reste ont r\u00e9ussi \u00e0 emp\u00eacher autour de 50 projets d’attaques terroristes contre les USA. Paul juge cette affirmation absolument mensong\u00e8re, puis il poursuit en d\u00e9cortiquant la logique-Syst\u00e8me que la NSA d\u00e9ploie pour justifier sa gigantesque action d’\u00e9coute et de surveillance. Surtout, il met en \u00e9vidence la compl\u00e8te inversion du propos, qui est de plaider que la radicale violation des droits civiques est n\u00e9cessaire pour prot\u00e9ger les droits civiques, comme il est n\u00e9cessaire de compl\u00e8tement violer la Constitution pour prot\u00e9ger la Constitution. Paul a une analogie particuli\u00e8rement pertinente : C’est comme la vieille histoire (du Vietnam) sur la n\u00e9cessit\u00e9 de br\u00fbler le village pour sauver le village. Ils veulent br\u00fbler la Constitution pour sauver la Constitution.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n\tQuelques extraits de l’intervention de Ron Paul :<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
\t\u00abI don’t really believe that because I think they fudged the figures. Of those 50 plots that they stopped, I think 40 were minor plots overseas, for all we know. Paul said, referring to comments made by NSA Director Keith Alexander during a House Intelligence Committee hearing.<\/em> […]<\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t \u00bbThey have to try to justify their existence of destroying the freedom of and the privacy of the American citizens, otherwise they’re out of work. Paul said on the Cavuto show Tuesday.<\/em> <\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00bbThey stretched the point. And even these hearings today were a bit of a shambecause they had already decided what the results would be, the former Congressman added. It’s sort of like the old story about you have to burn the village to save the village. They want to burn the Constitution to save the Constitution, he said.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00bbAnd even today, [James] Cole, the Deputy Attorney General says, the Fourth Amendment doesn’t apply to this. Where did he get this brilliance to know when it applies and when it doesn’t? Paul urged.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00bbIf we can go to war and do all these other things and throw the constitution out the window so casually, you better be sure if you give them an inch, they’re going to take a mile and paint themselves as heroes, Paul added. The one thing they don’t do is ever ask the motivation for people wanting to kill us. If we don’t ask that question we can’t stop these problems by just taking more liberties away from the American people. We’re going in the opposite way.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00bbWe’ve taken away the constitution, we’re supposed to be fighting to save the constitution. It’s completely turned on its head. the former Congressman asserted.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n\n
dedefensa.org<\/em><\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Ron Paul d\u00e9monte la logique-Syst\u00e8me de la NSA Premi\u00e8re remarque, pr\u00e9liminaire si l’on veut : Ron Paul est increvable. On ne l’a jamais autant entendu que depuis qu’il a cess\u00e9 toute activit\u00e9 parlementaire, et donc politique supposait-on. Depuis que PRISM\/NSA\/Snowdon a \u00e9clat\u00e9, l’ancien d\u00e9put\u00e9 du Texas est sur tous les fronts, d\u00e9molissant impitoyablement la narrative… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[14],"tags":[12247,4518,5099,3871,12212,4342,1010],"class_list":["post-75054","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-ouverture-libre","tag-civiques","tag-constitution","tag-droits","tag-nsa","tag-prism","tag-terroriste","tag-vietnam"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/75054","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=75054"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/75054\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=75054"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=75054"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=75054"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}