\tApr\u00e8s avoir r\u00e9alis\u00e9 plusieurs extensions, notamment dans le domaine international, le scandale des surveillances et \u00e9coutes de la NSA (PRISM\/NSA\/Snowden) est en train de devenir un ph\u00e9nom\u00e8ne autonome, et une crise en soi s’ins\u00e9rant dans l’infrastructure<\/a> crisique<\/a>. Cette transmutation de l’\u00e9v\u00e9nement est d’une r\u00e9elle importance dans la mesure o\u00f9 ce scandale est n\u00e9 au cur d’une des citadelles principales du Syst\u00e8me (la NSA et le complexe de diverses forces et centres de pouvoir qui l’entoure) ; dans la mesure o\u00f9 le d\u00e9bat qu’il suscite affecte directement certaines institutions centrales du Syst\u00e8me \u00e0 Washington (notamment le Congr\u00e8s US, outre bien s\u00fbr le gouvernement) ; dans la mesure o\u00f9 il se r\u00e9verb\u00e8re, comme on l’a indiqu\u00e9, au niveau international dans diverses directions, et diff\u00e9rents domaines transnationaux selon les normes de la globalisation, notamment par le biais de l’internet et des soci\u00e9t\u00e9s g\u00e9antes qui y sont impliqu\u00e9es.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n \tCela signifie qu’une nouvelle crise est install\u00e9e, qu’elle est d\u00e9sormais constitutive d’elle-m\u00eame et autonome, ne n\u00e9cessitant plus de sollicitations ext\u00e9rieures pour \u00eatre relanc\u00e9e et peu sensible par cons\u00e9quent aux tentatives d’\u00e9touffement, et m\u00eame devant r\u00e9sister d’une fa\u00e7on active face aux contraintes ext\u00e9rieures pour continuer \u00e0 exister. (D’autre part, bien entendu, les sollicitations ext\u00e9rieures dans le sens de la relance, notamment les r\u00e9v\u00e9lations r\u00e9guli\u00e8res de Snowden via Greendale et le Guardian<\/em>, promises pour un tr\u00e8s long terme, plusieurs mois, voire sur plus d’une \u00e0 deux ann\u00e9es, agiront effectivement en accentuant les capacit\u00e9s de relance et d’\u00e9ruption conjoncturelle de la crise devenue infrastructurelle.)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t Un point int\u00e9ressant, qui mesure l’\u00e9tat de d\u00e9fensive renforc\u00e9e o\u00f9 se trouve le Syst\u00e8me, est \u00e0 trouver dans le fait qu’Obama et son \u00e9quipe ont jug\u00e9 n\u00e9cessaire de consacrer une importante partie du discours de Berlin du pr\u00e9sident (voir aussi ce 20 juin 2013<\/a>). C\u00e9dant \u00e0 cette n\u00e9cessit\u00e9 d’intervention dans un pays qui est pr\u00e9sent\u00e9 par le whistleblower<\/em> Snowden comme le plus affect\u00e9 par les intrusions de la NSA et de son programme PRISM, le discours d’Obama \u00e0 Berlin est devenu un exercice de pure schizophr\u00e9nie, d\u00e9velopp\u00e9 \u00e0 l’aide d’Emmanuel Kant lui-m\u00eame (Effectivement, l’on ne se dissimule pas d’avoir des lettres, \u00e0 Washington. Selon nos sources, il nous para\u00eetrait apr\u00e8s tout bien possible que la NSA lance une action PRISM pour localiser ce type, ce Kant, et le mettre sur \u00e9coute, surveiller ces e-mails<\/em> qui sont para\u00eet-il dans un langage tr\u00e8s abscons qui semblerait un code ind\u00e9chiffrable, bref, on ne sait jamais.) Cette habilet\u00e9 culturelle a ouvert l’esprit de ses auditeurs \u00e0 la formidable plaidoirie d’Obama pour la d\u00e9fense et la protection des libert\u00e9s civiques, qu’on croirait venir, du moins dans sa premi\u00e8re partie, de la part d’une personnalit\u00e9 qui entend ainsi protester contre le programme PRISM et s’attaquer \u00e0 la NSA pour lui faire rendre gorge. Dans la partie suivante, Obama se transforme \u00e9videmment en plaideur et d\u00e9fenseur de PRISM. Bel exercice contorsionniste. (Guardian<\/em>, le 19 juin 2013<\/a>).<\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00abAfter quoting Immanuel Kant on freedom and his belief in open societies that respect that sanctity of the individual, the president echoed calls he made during a recent speech in Washington for an ending of America’s war on terror. Threats to freedom don’t merely come from the outside; they can come from within, from our own fears. For over a decade, America has been at war, but much has changed no nation can maintain its freedom if it does not move beyond mindset of perpetual war. The president called for tight controls on the use of new technology like drones and balancing security with privacy but said he was confident the US could strike the right balance.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00bbObama also insisted that US surveillance programmes were aimed at threats to security, not the communications of ordinary persons and said they keep people safe in Europe as well as the US. But he acknowledged there were legitimate concerns over privacy and other hot-button issues such as drones and Guant\u00e1namo. We must listen to voices that disagree with us, and have a open debate about how we use our powers and remember that government exists to serve the power of individual not the other way around that is what keeps us different to those on the other side of the wall. That’s what keeps us true to our better history, said Obama.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t Russia Today<\/em> a introduit un \u00e9l\u00e9ment nouveau au niveau de la diffusion internet des grands m\u00e9dias dont il est l’un des fleurons, avec les \u00e9l\u00e9ments d’une interview, ce 19 juin 2013<\/a>, d’un autre whistleblower<\/em> de La NSA, Thomas Drake, qui travailla pour la NSA de 2001 \u00e0 2008. Drake donne divers d\u00e9tails qui alourdissent encore le poids de la charge contre les pratiques de surveillance et d’\u00e9coute de la NSA. Les d\u00e9tails permettent de conclure que PRISM est en service depuis imm\u00e9diatement apr\u00e8s l’attaque de septembre 2001, sur une \u00e9chelle massive Blake estime sans beaucoup de difficult\u00e9s pour trouver des arguments, que PRISM et tout ce qui l’accompagne d\u00e9passent effectivement l’action de la Stasi<\/em> en R\u00e9publique D\u00e9mocratique Allemande, durant la Guerre froide, et am\u00e8ne \u00e0 une situation pire que celle d\u00e9crite par Orwell dans son 1984<\/em>.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00abThe mass surveillance program was actually initiated in the deepest of secrecy shortly after 9\/11, he told RT. In fact, there was a secret directive signed by President Bush during the first week of October of 2001, authorizing the NSA as the executive agent for the secret surveillance program to essentially turn the USA into the equivalent of a foreign nation for dragnet electronic surveillance. And it’s simply grown by leaps and bounds ever since. And it is now fully institutionalized and it’s on an industrial scale.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00bbIn Drake’s view, such practice breaks the social contract under the American constitution and is a huge betrayal of trust. But for the sake of national security the government decided in secret that it needed to gain records on just about anything and anybody from anywhere they could, he stated. And they just feel compelled to own the net. And to own the net means you have to have access to everything. To me it’s the 21st century version of the motto of the east-German surveillance state under the Stasi which was To know everything.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00bbThe former NSA official believes that there’s certainly a slope that we are going down that doesn’t look very positive if you were to forecast or project<\/em> [writer George<\/em>] Orwell into the future. Some have said, he pointed out that we’ve actually exceeded Orwell’s [character of his book] Winston cowering in the corners to avoid the ever-present cameras recording his every movement during the day and night.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00bbDrake recalled a chilling opinion that he heard from a couple who lives in Germany: At least we know that we live in a post-Fascist society. You live in a pre-Fascist society and don’t know it, he cited<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t L’interview de Blake dans Russia Today<\/em> symbolise une activit\u00e9 de communication importante de la station TV, et du syst\u00e8me de la communication en Russie concernant l’affaire PRISM\/NSA\/Snowdon. De fait, la Russie d\u00e9veloppe largement son int\u00e9r\u00eat pour cette affaire, et ce n’est certainement pas les conditions qu’a pu constater Poutine de l’\u00e9tat d’esprit des dirigeants du bloc BAO, et sp\u00e9cifiquement de BHO, lors du sommet du G-8, qui vont freiner cette tendance. L’agitation \u00e0 la Douma<\/em> \u00e0 cet \u00e9gard ouvre une nouvelle perspective, qui est celle de diverses actions l\u00e9gislatives l\u00e9gales motiv\u00e9es par PRISM\/NSA\/Snowden, \u00e9ventuellement contre les diff\u00e9rents acteurs du c\u00f4t\u00e9 US, et notamment la NSA et le gouvernement US. Il appara\u00eet d’abord que les parlementaires veulent que tous les \u00e9quipements de soutien et de logistique des organismes officiels et strat\u00e9giques de la Russie sur l’internet soient lib\u00e9r\u00e9s des contraintes et servitudes li\u00e9es \u00e0 des organismes et des soci\u00e9t\u00e9s US. La perte de confiance dans les organisations US, plus les Google, Yahoo !, etc., est un fait technologique et \u00e9conomique, et politique, d’une importance majeure. (Dans Russia Today<\/em>, le 19 juin 2013<\/a>.)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00abThe scandal over illegal data interception by US security services questions the correlation between the US and international law, and senior Russian officials are calling for an urgent update in Russian legislation in response. Russia will not ignore the actions of the US authorities who had admitted leaks of personal data of Russian citizens to which the US security services had access, the Foreign Ministry’s plenipotentiary for human rights, Konstantin Dolgov, said at a special meeting initiated by the Upper House of the Russian parliament. The principle of observing the human rights is stated in all UN Security Council resolutions on countering terrorism without exceptions. There must be respect of the international law that is no less important than the fight against terrorism. We must analyze how the current American laws match the corresponding international norms, we have a number of doubts on this issue, Dolgov said.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00bbThe Russian diplomat said that the US administration’s actions should be checked for falling under the fourth amendment of the US Constitution. The access to personal data by the US is being performed in a seemingly civilized way, but in a very roundabout way, many Human Rights groups have paid attention to this, the plenipotentiary noted.<\/em> [] <\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00bbA top official of the parliamentary majority party United Russia, Lower House vice speaker Sergey Zheleznyak also urged a detailed investigation into incidents in which US agencies collected personal data of Russian citizens. The MP ridiculed the US authorities for posing as a beacon of democracy while at the same time conducting constant eavesdropping and surveillance on millions of people, including citizens of the Russian Federation. Americans remind us for cutting short the propaganda of sodomy among minors and at the same time they stick their noses into personal correspondence of tens of millions of citizens, Zheleznyak said. More than that, they are not ashamed of wire-tapping the heads of states who take part in international events, he added, apparently hinting at the recent disclosure that in 2009 the US security services were intercepting the communications of then Russian President Dmitry Medvedev, while he was on a visit to the UK.<\/em> <\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00bbZheleznyak told the meeting that Russian laws should be urgently amended with an obligation to store all information of official bodies only on servers that physically are on the territory of the Russian Federation. The MP said that the Lower House could pass such bill, which he called digital sovereignty, in its Fall session. Finally, the parliamentarian urged other officials to give more support to Russia’s own electronics industry and software sector. We should produce our own electronic products instead of using someone else’s, Zheleznyak noted.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t Un article de Jakob Augstein paru la veille de la venue \u00e0 Berlin d’Obama, le 17 juin 2013<\/a> sur Spiegel OnLine<\/em>, juge tr\u00e8s s\u00e9v\u00e8rement l’activisme de surveillance et de contr\u00f4le de la n\u00e9buleuse NSA & Cie sur les pays europ\u00e9ens, notamment l’Allemagne class\u00e9e comme la plus affect\u00e9e de ce point de vue. Le jugement, assez inhabituel de la part d’un commentateur allemand lorsqu’il s’agit des USA, est explicitement du type avec des amis comme \u00e7a, nous n’avons pas besoin d’ennemis. L\u00e0-dessus, Augstein constate qu’il n’y a rien<\/strong> \u00e0 attendre du gouvernement allemand en fait de riposte, ce qui revient \u00e0 constater, au-del\u00e0 de l’all\u00e9geance habituelle de l’Allemagne aux USA, la complicit\u00e9 active et contrainte les unes par rapport aux autres des directions-Syst\u00e8me du bloc BAO. Il n’emp\u00eache qu’Augstein, dans une Allemagne tr\u00e8s proche dans l’esprit et les conceptions des milieux du PE, r\u00e9percute une position extr\u00eamement dure des parlementaires europ\u00e9ens vis-\u00e0-vis de cette affaire ; d’o\u00f9 son appel, en fin d’article, \u00e0 une action de la Commission europ\u00e9enne pour \u00e9tablir une l\u00e9gislation de protection, sorte de protectionnisme, si l’on veut, ce qui implique une belle dose d’ironie par les temps qui courent, contre les firmes US de l’internet qui collaborent avec la NSA.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00abOn Tuesday, Barack Obama is coming to Germany. But who, really, will be visiting? He is the 44th president of the United States. He is the first African American to hold the office. He is an intelligent lawyer. And he is a Nobel Peace Prize laureate. But is he a friend? The revelations brought to us by IT expert Edward Snowden have made certain what paranoid computer geeks and left-wing conspiracy theorists have long claimed: that we are being watched. All the time and everywhere. And it is the Americans who are doing the watching.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00bbOn Tuesday, the head of the largest and most all-encompassing surveillance system ever invented is coming for a visit. If Barack Obama is our friend, then we really don’t need to be terribly worried about our enemies<\/em> [] <\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00bbGerman citizens should be able to expect that their government will protect them from spying by foreign governments. But the German interior minister says instead: We are grateful for the excellent cooperation with US secret services. Friedrich didn’t even try to cover up his own incompetence on the surveillance issue. Everything we know about it, we have learned from the media, he said. The head of the country’s domestic intelligence agency, Hans-Georg Maassen, was not any more enlightened. I didn’t know anything about it, he said. And Justice Minister Sabine Leutheusser-Schnarrenberger was also apparently in the dark. These reports are extremely unsettling, she said. With all due respect: These are the people who are supposed to be protecting our rights? If it wasn’t so frightening, it would be absurd<\/em> []<\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00bbA simpler approach would be to just force American firms to respect European laws. The European Commission has the ability to do that. The draft for a new data privacy directive has already been presented. It just has to be implemented. Once that happens, American secret services might still be able to walk all over European law, but if US Internet giants like Google, Apple, Microsoft and Facebook want to continue making money off of a half-billion Europeans, then they will have to abide by our laws. Under the new law, companies caught passing on data in ways not permitted are forced to pay fines. You can be sure that these companies would in turn apply pressure to their own government. The proposal envisions setting that fine at 2 percent of a company’s worldwide revenues. That’s a lot of money and also a language that America understands.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t Pour poursuivre dans ce refgistre, on notera que nombre de dirigeants et d’experts de l’internet, impliquant de pr\u00e8s ou de loin les firmes travaillant avec la NSA, sont d\u00e9sormais lanc\u00e9s dans des r\u00e9flexions r\u00e9formistes radicales concernant les structures de l’internet. Le jugement g\u00e9n\u00e9ral est que le scandale PRISM\/NSA\/Snowden constitue un game-changer<\/em> du statut de l’internet, et c’est \u00e9galement de ce point de vue que l’on voit combien ce scandale est devenu une crise en soi. Par ailleurs, nombre de ces dirigeants et experts jugent que l’affaire est grave pour l’administratioon Obama, avec des r\u00e9percutions possibles, dans la mesure o\u00f9 ce pas important a \u00e9t\u00e9 franchi : la sacro-sainte libert\u00e9 de l’internet, dans tous les cas le principe fondamental de cette libert\u00e9, qui est mis en cause et menac\u00e9 d’une fa\u00e7on affich\u00e9. (Voir le Guardian<\/em>, le 19 juin 2013<\/a>.)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00abThe founder of the world’s biggest marketing services company,<\/em> [WPP] Sir Martin Sorrell, has said he believes revelations about the National Security Agency’s Prism internet surveillance program are a game changer that will spark a fundamental rethink of web privacy by web users <\/em>[] I think Prism and what’s happening in the US will have a very significant impact, I think it is game changing, he said, speaking to the Guardian at the Cannes Lions International Festival of Creativity on Wednesday. I think the privacy issue is going to be raised to a new level by this. It will alter people’s views on privacy, even younger people.<\/em> []<\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00bbWikipedia founder Jimmy Wales, also speaking to the Guardian in a video interview at the Cannes Lions festival on Wednesday, said he thought most people would find the Prism revelations pretty astonishing.<\/em> [] [He<\/em>] said it was going to be a serious issue for US president Barack Obama. Simply because he did make a lot of really positive noises about not doing this kind of thing, or cutting back on it, or being more transparent about it, Wales added. For this to all come out it doesn’t feel right for the Obama base. I think that’s going to be potentially something he has to deal with. What I would forecast in the long run is that more and more and more services online are going to go to encryption. Not just to make sure the government is not snooping on people, but just for basic security.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n \tMis en ligne le 20 juin 2013 \u00e0 17H29<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" PRISM\/NSA\/Snowden, crise (infra)structurelle Apr\u00e8s avoir r\u00e9alis\u00e9 plusieurs extensions, notamment dans le domaine international, le scandale des surveillances et \u00e9coutes de la NSA (PRISM\/NSA\/Snowden) est en train de devenir un ph\u00e9nom\u00e8ne autonome, et une crise en soi s’ins\u00e9rant dans l’infrastructure crisique. Cette transmutation de l’\u00e9v\u00e9nement est d’une r\u00e9elle importance dans la mesure o\u00f9 ce scandale est… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[3670,8294,12213,12248,3659,7572,60,3871,12212,12249,4999],"class_list":["post-75055","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-berlin","tag-crisique","tag-ecoute","tag-gleendale","tag-guardian","tag-infrastructure","tag-internet","tag-nsa","tag-prism","tag-snowdon","tag-surveillance"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/75055","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=75055"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/75055\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=75055"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=75055"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=75055"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}